What's new

Discussion of Iranian support for Palestinian resistance groups

Further indication of where Iranian hard earned $$$ is spent on foreign liberation organization without knowledge, or consent of the Iranian people.
one day Iranians will bring mullahs to account for spending their money on overseas adventures..
Since when do countries reveal or seek approval from the population for any budget, let alone a 'black ops' budget?

This is a necessary investment to build external deterrence against a nuclear-armed and rabidly vicious enemy of Iran which is hellbent on our destruction.

However much Iran spends on those weapons, Israel spends much more on having to deal with those threats. That diverts funds they could use to attack Iran, and also builds deterrence against an act of aggression against Iran itself. That alone makes it worth it.
 
...Leave the moral issues and land issues they have with Palestine to the Arabs ...The last time I checked we were still Persians.

You are on every occasion against anything Arab, but in fact you looks just like some wahabi retarded and racist Arabs 😂🤣
 
Iranian investments in the region usually pay off quite nice, unlike Saudi terror investment in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.

For example thanks to Iranian support to Iraq, Iraq is now Irans second biggest trade partner. Iraq are currently importing approximately nine billion dollars worth of Iranian products annually and this figure is only increasing and I'm not even counting all the reconstruction projects (oil/gas sector, roads, railways, bridges, hospitals, electricity etc.) awarded too Iranian companies.
and second largest country in debt to Iran after china
 
Further indication of where Iranian hard earned $$$ is spent on foreign liberation organization without knowledge, or consent of the Iranian people.
one day Iranians will bring mullahs to account for spending their money on overseas adventures..

It's spent at the same time on protecting Iran from a regime that seeks to balkanize Iran. Opposing this policy would imply aiding a staunch enemy in its plots against Iran's very existence as a unified nation-state. It would stand in contrast to Iran's core national interest, at least as much as it would run against Islamic solidarity.

This is not a gratuitous, adventurous undertaking nor an optional strategy for Iran: it is pure, urgent self-defence and deterrence. Iran did not initiate this conflict either, zionist imperialists did and they did so before the Revolution already by depriving Iran of her sovereignty, which goes to illustrate zionism's fundamental goals vis à vis Iran. Zionism is a hegemonic, supremacist ideology with universal ambitions bent on domineering nations, all of them.

So Iranian patriots and nationalists who understand the nature of zionism and studied the latter appropriately, will be supportive of the Islamic Republic's Resistance towards the regime in Tel Aviv, regardless of any religious considerations.
 
Last edited:
You are on every occasion against anything Arab, but in fact you looks just like some wahabi retarded and racist Arabs 😂🤣
I am not anti Arab..I am Pro_Iran... I see no reason why Iran should help any non-Iranian country or movement by depriving her own population...A house built for Palestinian or Lebanese is a house NOT built for an Iranian...I would have said that if Mullahs were spending Iranian cash on Venezuelans..

For those who claim helping Palestinians is helping Iran to fight the Israel enemy...keep in mind that Israel is our enemy because we made them to be our enemy in the first place...so do not not start the chicken and egg story.

And the funny part of all this is that the recipients of the Iranian aid always thank not Iran but ERDOGAN for helping them...go figure that..:undecided::undecided:
 
For those who claim helping Palestinians is helping Iran to fight the Israel enemy...keep in mind that Israel is our enemy because we made them to be our enemy in the first place...so do not not start the chicken and egg story.

So zionist treatment of Iran as a vassal prior to the Islamic Revolution is not an act of enmity? Zonist lobbie as a matter of facts exercising arbitrary and overbearing control on any nation they are able to, is in order?
 
So zionist treatment of Iran as a vassal prior to the Islamic Revolution is not an act of enmity? Zonist lobbies exercising arbitrary and overbearing control on any nation they are able to, is in order?
After Revolution Iran was no longer vassal..That did not mean that Iran had to become an active enemy of Israel..We could have done just like all other so called Islamic nations do..give verbal support..leave active support to the Arabs.
 
After Revolution Iran was no longer vassal..That did not mean that Iran had to become an active enemy of Israel..We could have done just like all other so called Islamic nations do..give verbal support..leave active support to the Arabs.

Question is how sovereign those nations are, and how capable they are to refuse reshaping their nations and societies according to the zionist / globalist agenda? The Saudis and Emiratis for instance can decide to no longer be used as proxies against Iran however the liberal reforms they're conducting at home are in line with the zionist agenda for goy nations. Also they indirectly reaped the benefits of Iran's Resistance because if it wasn't for Iran the zionists would likely have set their sights on them.
 
Last edited:
After Revolution Iran was no longer vassal..That did not mean that Iran had to become an active enemy of Israel..We could have done just like all other so called Islamic nations do..give verbal support..leave active support to the Arabs.
Partially true, but the idea of relinquishing our sovereignty in this way, a sign of defeat and giving up, sickens me.

BTW one thing people overlook is that Iranians were never fans of Israel, that's why the Shah had to hide most of the cooperation, and the trade was minimal.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom