What's new

Why Saudi Arabia's $110 billion deal with the US over 10 years is not oversised

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
World Arms Market

2016 (Just one year)

- The global arms market is one of the largest international markets with a value of 365 billion dollars in 2016

- Sales of the world's top 100 weapons companies reached $ 1 trillion in 2016

- 7 out of the 10 biggest/strongest weapons companies are in the United States.

- US arms sales reached $ 210 billion and accounted for 57% of arms sales of the top 100 global companies

- All sales of US arms companies reached 561 billion dollars

- The sales of Russian arms companies amounted to 30 billion dollars and represent 8% of arms sales of the top 100 global companies


20161211_Arms_Companies.jpg


Arms-Exporters-Importer.jpg


160524104218-arms-sales-by-country-gfx-exlarge-169.jpg


Defense and arms - Statistics & Facts

For those who adhere to a realpolitik interpretation of international affairs, a bigger military is akin to a greater share of global power and influence. Whether such a framing of international relations is what dictates patterns in military spending or not, global defense spending appeared to plateau from 2009 to 2014. The largest contributor to the vast sums of money spent on defense and arms each year is the United States military. A look at the 15 countries with the highest military spending in 2015 shows that the United States spent almost 600 billion U.S. dollars, more than double that of China in second place.

This high amount of spending has helped to maintain the military dominance of the United States around the world. This stretches to a number of aspects and is evident in the United States accounting for more than a quarter of active military aircraft globally. Although current aircraft are important, new drone technology has created a new arms race arena. By 2020, the expected market value for military UAVs worldwide is set to reach 11.6 billion U.S. dollars.

Given the variance in country sizes and the strength of their respective economies, military expenditure as a percentage of gross domestic product is a useful tool for evaluating the importance particular states place on their military. In this measure Saudi Arabia stands out from all other countries. In 2015, 13.7 percent of the country’s gross domestic product was spent on defense and arms.

But when it comes to military power, size certainly matters. As such, larger states such as the United States and China have massive militaries despite spending less as a portion of their gross domestic product. China has the biggest military in the world in regards to military personnel, counting over 2.3 million people in their ranks. Despite placing more emphasis on technology and weaponry, the size of the United States military still numbers over 1.3 million.

https://www.statista.com/topics/1696/defense-and-arms/
 
Last edited:
It is still really large, though. For other countries, measures would be taken against spending so much on weapons. But to Saudi Arabia, it seems, money is just a number.
It is right that size matters, but with a population of only over 30 million, I doubt that SA has the manpower to translate the weapons to a real threat of invasion to anybody with an army.
 
It is still really large, though. For other countries, measures would be taken against spending so much on weapons. But to Saudi Arabia, it seems, money is just a number.
It is right that size matters, but with a population of only over 30 million, I doubt that SA has the manpower to translate the weapons to a real threat of invasion to anybody with an army.
Yes, but KSA does not seek any invasion.. all the weapons are for its own defense.. When one has large and big assets to defend, he seeks large numbers of weapons.. and KSA is also going for high quality..
 
Yes, but KSA does not seek any invasion.. all the weapons are for its own defense.. When one has large and big assets to defend, he seeks large numbers of weapons.. and KSA is also going for high quality..
Yes. But many forces around the world are able to invade at a fraction of the price.
In addition, a deterrent might not have to be that big. A deal half the size would have been good enough for one.
If the Saudis saved this into an emergency fund, then if someone tried to invade them or do anything, then nobody would refuse that kind of money.
 
Yes. But many forces around the world are able to invade at a fraction of the price.
In addition, a deterrent might not have to be that big. A deal half the size would have been good enough for one.
If the Saudis saved this into an emergency fund, then if someone tried to invade them or do anything, then nobody would refuse that kind of money.

That's what you get when you fear about your throne and the next door guy... You buy anything the insurrance guy sells you... and if someone criticize your move... you will give any irrational answer to justify your madness...
Fear Selling 101...
 
That's what you get when you fear about your throne and the next door guy... You buy anything the insurrance guy sells you... and if someone criticize your move... you will give any irrational answer to justify your madness...
Fear Selling 101...
I think it is more to do with two scenarios:
1 - People get poorer and want to overthrow the king. The US sees its client at risk. US helps crush rebellion and clean up swiftly.
2. - People get poorer and want to overthrow the king. The US betrays him and gives the order for an arms embargo on SA. At least one of the Army and National Guard helps them defend the throne and fend off those sneaky powers looking for oil at the end of their adventure. Saudis give them a bloody nose and when people see outside powers listing for their oil, they quickly call off the plan and take up arms for the king.
Both ways, the king wins. Either through a Bahrain scenario or through a 2003 scenario but with a much stronger defender.
 
I think it is more to do with two scenarios:
1 - People get poorer and want to overthrow the king. The US sees its client at risk. US helps crush rebellion and clean up swiftly.
2. - People get poorer and want to overthrow the king. The US betrays him and gives the order for an arms embargo on SA. At least one of the Army and National Guard helps them defend the throne and fend off those sneaky powers looking for oil at the end of their adventure. Saudis give them a bloody nose and when people see outside powers listing for their oil, they quickly call off the plan and take up arms for the king.
Both ways, the king wins. Either through a Bahrain scenario or through a 2003 scenario but with a much stronger defender.

KSA has money... but money couldn't buy everything... from the US... so they needed to make their current enemy the condition for their acquisition... and thankfully...Today WH owner is the good puppet for that... But even ahving a common enemy wasn't enough... they had to close their eyes on another "kind" of enemy... Mister Israel...
Iran evil+ Friendly Israel = Enjoy your shopping spree...

It' snot only KSA plan... since another smaller country did understood this concept since a long time ago... UAE...

So the real puppet master ( or think to be) is the UAE in the region... They are another version of Israel foreign policy... but more dangerous... since Israel say it out loud... while UAE keep it in the shadow... therefore..;even if it's sad to say so... Israel is more truthfull than UAE...
 
KSA has money... but money couldn't buy everything... from the US... so they needed to make their current enemy the condition for their acquisition... and thankfully...Today WH owner is the good puppet for that... But even ahving a common enemy wasn't enough... they had to close their eyes on another "kind" of enemy... Mister Israel...
Iran evil+ Friendly Israel = Enjoy your shopping spree...

It' snot only KSA plan... since another smaller country did understood this concept since a long time ago... UAE...

So the real puppet master ( or think to be) is the UAE in the region... They are another version of Israel foreign policy... but more dangerous... since Israel say it out loud... while UAE keep it in the shadow... therefore..;even if it's sad to say so... Israel is more truthfull than UAE...
True. If the UAE didn't exist, Libya would now be a stable democracy like Tunisie. Now look at the state my country is in.
I also heard that the UAE wages its own war against democracy, whether in Egypt or Turkey or Libya or Tunisia or their generous friend Qatar. Tunisia has understood this and is acting with dignity. Something I like about you guys.
 
True. If the UAE didn't exist, Libya would now be a stable democracy like Tunisie. Now look at the state my country is in.
I also heard that the UAE wages its own war against democracy, whether in Egypt or Turkey or Libya or Tunisia or their generous friend Qatar. Tunisia has understood this and is acting with dignity. Something I like about you guys.
It will come inshallah for the libyan Brothers. They just need to settle their stupid rivilery among those in power...
You have a lot of things to succeed in the future...fight for it. or just let's make one country among us two :)
 
It will come inshallah for the libyan Brothers. They just need to settle their stupid rivilery among those in power...
You have a lot of things to succeed in the future...fight for it. or just let's make one country among us two :)
In sha Allah. Our best hope is that UAE runs out of money or doesn't pay attention, or that Haftar does of old age. It's really not a silly rivalry, but more of a single traitor surrounded by mercenaries and billions of dollars and thousands of ACVs manned by gangsters (literally) and a few helos and Russian, UAE, Egyptian and French support, all against the rest of Libya. He is definitely not a leader.
Libya and Tunisia will make really close friends inshallah. Imagine the manpower of 20 million skilled Tunisians in all the land and oil in Libya. A great hope for both of us. :yahoo:
 
In sha Allah. Our best hope is that UAE runs out of money or doesn't pay attention, or that Haftar does of old age. It's really not a silly rivalry, but more of a single traitor surrounded by mercenaries and billions of dollars and thousands of ACVs manned by gangsters (literally) and a few helos and Russian, UAE, Egyptian and French support, all against the rest of Libya. He is definitely not a leader.
Libya and Tunisia will make really close friends inshallah. Imagine the manpower of 20 million skilled Tunisians in all the land and oil in Libya. A great hope for both of us. :yahoo:

Inshallah.
 

Back
Top Bottom