What's new

Iranian UAVs | News and Discussions

The newer Mohajer-6 and Shahed-129 are Tehran's weapons of choice for northern Iraq, said Adam Rawnsley, who tracks Iranian drones for the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

"The way Iran is using drones against Kurdish targets in Iraq is 180 degrees different than how they use drones everywhere else. It's much more sophisticated," he said.
Can someone explain how 180 degress?
 
5219777_931.jpg

12436463_714.jpg

Heres a rather neat pic,its the fotros but carrying something other that the hellfire copies/look-a-likes that we`ve seen previously.It looks like its carrying at least 2 spike copies plus a ghaem.Interestingly in addition to the ghaem glide bomb just in front of the fotros there is also the transport tube for the iranian spike copy
 
Last edited:
5219777_931.jpg

12436463_714.jpg

Heres a rather neat pic,its the fotros but carrying something other that the hellfire copies/look-a-likes that we`ve seen previously.It looks like its carrying at least 2 spike copies plus a ghaem.Interestingly in addition to the ghaem glide bomb just in front of the fotros there is also the transport tube for the iranian spike copy

refreshing to see someone staying on topic, thanks for the pics 👍
 
When it comes to UAVs, this scirmish between Armenia and Aserbaidschan shows that if you want to control the battle field with UAVs, you must have the abillity to build them self in masses. Yo cant go into such kind of war strategie with just 200 or 300 UAVs. If they are blown away, your war strategie is broken and you will lose the war. Iran do it right in developing and producing its drones self and also have masses of them.
 
so yesterday a Mersad drone dropped Mersad bombs and a fighter jet got destroyed by a Mersad air defense system in a military exercise.


we have so many Mersads :lol::tup:



for those who don't know the Mersad drones these are Mersad but they have a non jet versions too so Mersads have 2 different versions


1601634768399.png


1601634834877.png


1601634401590.png
 
Last edited:
There were also IRGC high ranking members who said that holding up Assad would be a bad idea during the early days of the war. They said that we should negotiate with the West on Syria during the dark days of the conflict. They said that it’s a waste of effort.

Well those voices thankfully did not win over the majority. Or else right now Syria would be under control of headchoppers and Iran would undoubtly be weaker.

Iran must uphold the territorial integrity of Armenia and also not allow Azerbaijan to take the land by FORCE. Maintaining status quo is a whole lot better than setting precedent you can invade whenever you think something Belongs to you. Saddam also used that logic in 1980.

Good intentions can have bad consequences down the road. Assad allow Sunni terrorists to use his border region to attack US troops during the Iraqi occupation. A few years later those same terrorists would turn on Assad.

If Iran allows Azerbaijan to take over the disputed territory, what’s not to say tommorrow Iranian Azeris don’t say they want to join this new Azerbaijan Republic?

My point is even good intentions can blow up in your face.
GOod post bro.
 

Attachments

  • 7E1F723A-984A-4119-95A1-A67E99203FC7.jpeg
    7E1F723A-984A-4119-95A1-A67E99203FC7.jpeg
    621.5 KB · Views: 52
  • 62015CA5-4602-4976-92B1-6EEF60DFE051.jpeg
    62015CA5-4602-4976-92B1-6EEF60DFE051.jpeg
    596.9 KB · Views: 52

Back
Top Bottom