- Feb 20, 2009
- Reaction score
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Good news land put to useLets hope the land is used for farming and generates a new second green revolution; and not for making more DHAs
Insiders claim military will "reap no benefit"; 40pc of revenue to go to Punjab, 20pc for R&D.www.dawn.com
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government of Punjab has signed an agreement to hand over at least 45,267 acres of land in three districts — Bhakkar, Khushab, and Sahiwal — of the province to the Pakistan Army for ‘Corporate Agriculture Farming’.
According to a document, the military’s land directorate wrote to the Punjab chief secretary, Board of Revenue and secretaries of the agriculture, forest, livestock and irrigation departments for handing over of 42,724-acre land in tehsils Kaloor Kot and Mankera in Bhakkar, 1,818 acres in tehsils Quaidabad and Khushab in Khushab, and 725 acres in tehsil Chichawatni of Sahiwal.
The letter referred to a notification of the Punjab government dated Feb 20, 2023, and a joint venture (JV) agreement of March 8. It reminded that “while signing the JV management agreement on March 8, it was decided that state lands immediately required for the project be handed over to Pakistan Army.”
According to informed sources, the JV has been signed between the military, the Punjab government, and private firms dealing with corporate farming.
Speaking about the salient features of the proposed project, the sources said that the Punjab government will provide the land while the army will utilise its resources and retain the management of the project. The private sector, on the other hand, will invest and provide auxiliary support, including the supply of fertilisers.
Military sources confirmed this development and said that the army was “not taking over the ownership of the land as it will remain the property” of the Punjab government. “The intervention of the army will provide a coherent administrative structure,” the sources added.
They said that the land in question is mostly barren, uncultivated, and under-cultivated and added that the army with the assistance of the relevant stakeholders, including its JV partners and locals, will turn this into fertile land.
The sources said that the Punjab Board of Revenue has conducted surveys for months and identified these lands for corporate farming purposes.
The sources said that the project will be managed by retired army officers and the army will not get any pecuniary benefit out of this project rather the profit from the farming will go to the locals, the Punjab government, and firms that will invest in the project.
At least 40pc of the revenue generated from the cultivation will go to the Punjab government, 20 per cent will be spent on modern research and development in the agriculture sector, while the remaining will be used for the succeeding crops and expansion of the project.
They said that the agri sector’s growth rate from 4 per cent in 1960 dropped to 2.5pc in 2022 due to “flawed reforms, ineffective agriculture policies coupled with climate change, and population boom”.
Citing the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), the sources said that at least 27pc of the total cultivated land of Pakistan was not being utilised. In order to deal with this situation, the Punjab government has made a plan to restore the agriculture sector with the help of the Pakistan Army. With the use of modern agricultural methods, machinery, and high-quality seeds, agricultural production will be increased manifold, the sources claimed.
According to the sources, in the first phase of the project, different varieties of pulses, millets and rice will be cultivated. This will be followed by large-scale cultivation of canola and wheat.
What independent policy? Please describe.Ek Civilian ne aa ker Independent Foreign Policy laney ki koshish
So you are saying they are lying..its not just administration..it will be ownership unlike their claim.The statement showed that the company’s loss, after tax, stood at a whopping Rs1,253 million compared to Rs758 million in the same period last year. Gross profit was down to Rs178 million from Rs545 million.
The Securities and Exchange Commision of Pakistan (SECP), which is the premier regulatory body for publicly listed companies on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX), has finally allowed Fauji Foods Limitprofit.pakistantoday.com.pk
Fauji Foundation just creates losses like PIA, railway etc. They are not efficient enough. They just need more land for high-quality agrarian products only for their families. If not, later they will convert that to the real state.
What independent policy? Please describe.
Are you saying we should have sided Russia on Ukraine conflict?
Our current stance is neutrality since the conflict.
Nope.. I am not sure about that. I was pointing out that institutions managed by the army are also in losses. Civilians are not that rich, and no foreign investor will come in such turmoil.So you are saying they are lying..its not just administration..it will be ownership unlike their claim.
Can you tell me who is the aggressor. Who invaded in this conflict?Our current stance is jo abbu america bol dey .. thorey dollar mil jaye hum to ukrain mey larney pohanch jayegey. Neutral stance (bhai ye baatain indians ko bol doya karo hum bhi Pakistani hain achey se samjhtey hain "neutral stance") .
Sawal wahin aa ker rukhta ha "hamey mila kiya " ayub khan k zamaney se pindi ne america ko abbu banaya hua ha. Hum ko mila kiya ? Hamara parosi india dono kashti mey sawaar ho ker kahan pohanch gya or hum aj kal imf ( also an american stoogs) se 1 billion ki bheek mang rahey . Wo bhi zillat k bawajood mil nahi rahi .Btw can pakistan really do new brave ventures in foreign policy front when it's economy is weak it has internal issues , most of the export country goes to one country..foreign policy is always extended into new waters when you have a strong base..
Bhai ap ye bata do na humko mila kiya is faisley sek hum usa k camp mey rahey gey .Can you tell me who is the aggressor. Who invaded in this conflict?
Let's talk on principles.. ..the fact Pakistan still voted for neutrality on 3 different instances at UN is still a positive.