What's new

Wouldn’t have achieved freedom without India: Bangladesh delegation

do you know how diverse north india is? Bhojpuris, Maithalis, Paharis, Jatts, Rajputs and punjabis are all diferent from each other. And pakistan has punjabi tribes not found in india. You are right about skin color not being much different, or ot as different as some people want to believe, but skin color is a superficial similarity.

Skin color is not superficial my dear.

Kamal Hassan could not become a super star even being a Tamil because he had fair skin while Rajnikanth became a superstar in Tamilnadu being a Marathi as he had dark skin.

Tamils will drive anyone who has fair skin out of Tamilnadu. You have to have dark skin to live safely in Tamilnadu.

bangladeshis are eastern indo aryan people. South indians are dravidians. Very different people. The only people in India Bengalis share similarities with are indian bengalis, Assamese, and Odias.

What nonsense. Dravidian has nothing to do with race rather with region.
 
i do notsee how indians are similar to bangladeshis with the exception of indian bengalis and assamese.



Overall they are. Based on my experience here in London with both bengalis and indians, they come across as being very similar in terms of looks, features, habits etc. Both are very different to Pakistanis as a whole.
 
Two evil-twins finally united after 1971, it is almost impossible to differentiate between a Bengali and an Indian. :angel:
. But, but almost all others in the world call and consider someone else EVIL . Maybe for some reason. :devil:
 
You have to generalize when you are comparing. There are always few exceptions but are not relevant.

Yes. North Indians and Pakistanis are identical from the point of skin color, culture and habits except for the religion.



They're not. I have seen both sikhs and Pakistanis here in London for over 30 years and it is EXTREMELY easy to tell the 2 apart even when the sikhs don't wear turbans. ONLY a VERY small minority of north indians are similar to Pakistanis. Based on my experience, indians, south, east, north or west are more similar to one another than they are with Pakistanis.

upload_2018-12-15_15-56-15-png.526817

This is vulgar dress and unIslamic for women



What the hell is that???????????.......no wonder they have such an obsessive hatred towards Pakistan..........lol.......:lol:
 
Alright, but you are confirming that at-least identical evil-twins were finally united.
We're not identical though. Maybe Fraternal at best.

They're not. I have seen both sikhs and Pakistanis here in London for over 30 years and it is EXTREMELY easy to tell the 2 apart even when the sikhs don't wear turbans. ONLY a VERY small minority of north indians are similar to Pakistanis. Based on my experience, indians, south, east, north or west are more similar to one another than they are with Pakistanis.





What the hell is that???????????.......no wonder they have such an obsessive hatred towards Pakistan..........lol.......:lol:
I agree that Indians and Pakistanis and Indians are different people. If we were the same, we would not have separated. But your comment about being able to automatically tell Indians apart from Pakistanis is interesting. although it is possible in some cases, you must have some psychic powers if you can do that as accurately as you claim.

Lahore, Pakistan
street-scene-christian-quarter-of-youhanabad-lahore-punjab-pakistan-CR555W.jpg

street-scene-in-the-youhanabad-colony-lahore-pakistan-E5HR8E.jpg


Lucknow, India
th

stock-photo-lucknow-india-jan-elderly-cyclist-driving-on-the-busy-indian-street-with-vehicles-and-434309653.jpg
 
Alright, but you are confirming that at-least identical evil-twins were finally united.

Well universal rule. Enemies, enemy is a friend. Even Pakistan has been doing that from early days. Everybody does that. I bet you missed your chance in 1962. Now don't blame others for your stupidity. LOL :bunny:
 
Last edited:
Well universal rule. Enemies, enemy is a friend. Even Pakistan has been doing that from early days. Everybody does that. I bet you missed your chance in 1962. Now don't blame others for your stupidity. LOL :bunny:

In all honesty, 1962 was indeed the biggest blunder Pakistan has ever made.
 
In all honesty, 1962 was indeed the biggest blunder Pakistan has ever made.

Never, if Pakistan had also joined Chinese back then, there was a great potential of a mini World War or even a third centered around the subcontinent with U.S.A and U.S.S.R and their respective allies arming and testing all their cold War arsenal with either parties. And in that event Pakistan would equally suffer if not more like India and China. LOL :-):-):-)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom