Will India, Pakistan and Afghanistan get Balkanised in 2020?

[Cobra Arbok]

The moghal empire is a prime example. Again it is about perspective... To the Hindu of course this is incorrect...to the Pakistani this is elementary.

Butwasnt the mughal empire started by an Uzbek? And Aurangzeb was born in India. So i do not see how pakistan can claim to be the sole successer of the mughals when it is shared indian pakistani and aghan hisory. Similar to how pakistan cannot claim the entirety of the ivc for itself because some of the most significant ivc sites are in india.

 

[Clutch]

Butwasnt the mughal empire started by an Uzbek? And Aurangzeb was born in India. So i do not see how pakistan can claim to be the sole successer of the mughals when it is sha

I am of moghal descent and Pakistani. Pakistanis will always be the superior rulers of this subcontinent as is their heritage.

Of course Hindutvaization will disagree... Because pakistans history doesn't look upon them too favorably.

 

[prashantazazel]

So another fake ID starts a thread.
I'm this is Ashok, again.

Anyhow, with growing economic and military strength, and rising nationalism, India can't really have a problem with secessionist forces. Any secessionist movement will be considered backward, and their supporters annihilated.

In fact, it is unusual for a strong country to break up.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

So another fake ID starts a thread.

What do you mean by fake id? My ID was registered and approved by PDF admins.

I'm this is Ashok, again.

I never claimed I am the Ashoka the great.

In fact, it is unusual for a strong country to break up.

What happened to Rome?

 

[Cobra Arbok]

I am of moghal descent and Pakistani. Pakistanis will always be the superior rulers of this subcontinent as is their heritage.

Of course Hindutvaization will disagree... Because pakistans history doesn't look upon them too favorably.

Well indian history aka history that is accepted by most of the world does not look to favorably on you so I guess we will have to agee to disagree.

Although i still fail to see ow you can call yourseves rulers of the subcontinent when you never ruled over modern india. In fact for most of your history you were ruled by foreigners. Indian hindus did rule you guys for almost 500 years through the mauryan and gupta empires.

 

[Nityam]

Imran Khan admitting that the pakistani sate and Army Kidnapped its own citizens.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070066855862329344

 

[Clutch]

Although i still fail to see ow you can call yourseves rulers of the subcontinent when you never ruled over modern india. In fact for most of your history you were ruled by foreigners. Indian hindus did rule you guys for almost 500 years through the mauryan and gupta empires.

Of course you will fail to see Pakistan's dominance over present day India. You are of the Hindu persuasions it is your only recourse.

The fact that the pakistani moghals ruled India for centuries will always be a sore point for you guys.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

Of course you will fail to see Pakistan's dominance over present day India. You are of the Hindu persuasions it is your only recourse.

The fact that the pakistani moghals ruled India for centuries will always be a sore point for you guys.

Yes the Mughals ruled northern India for about 500 years. Big Deal. But I bet you conveniently ignore the fact that the only part of south Asia to be ruled by the Mughals for 1000 years is modern day Pakistan. Whereas the entirety of India was NEVER ruled by Muslims. During most of the Mughal empire's rule, SOuth India was ruled by the Vijayanagar Empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijayanagara_Empire
Portuguesse and Italian travelers as well as Akbar himself wrote that the Vijayanagar EMpire was the most powerful force in the subcontinent, so it looks like the Mughals did not dominate India after all lol.
The Vijaryanagar Emprie fell during Aurangzeb,but Aurnangzeb was born in India and considered himself Indian. So casically, and Indian ruled india for less than a century before getting his *** kicked by the Marathas. At their height the Marathas ruled almost the entire subcontinent, from Dhaka to Peshawar

So from 1650-1847, the Marathas as well as Rajputs and Sikhs were the dominant forces in the Indian Subcontinent. What happened to Pakistani/Muslim domination. Oh and Tipu Sultan and Hyder Ali were born in India and considered themselves indian So even your Muslim heroes are not Pakistani lol. So much for Muslim domination.

I understand you prefer Muslim history, but why do you aknowledge the rest of South Asian history? Does the fact you were ruled for almost 1000 years by Indian Hindu make you insecure? Keep in mind what I am talking about is real history, not Paksitani brainwashing. if you disagree with me, counter me with facts or don't bother.

 

[El Sidd]

Why leave out Bangladesh?

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Aged like milk