Why the US will have to end it's war on terror due economy and it's unsustainable

[Titanium100]

War on terror it's like fighting ghosts who are actully not there or fighting a mirage that is not there but when you come close it vanishes. It's a money sucking black-hole, time consuming and end-less. wasting that kind of money on non-state actors is equal to fighting ghosts.

The US is fighting war on terror in more then 20 countries active wars and have soldiers and funds.

Hence the WW3 players have appeared already and the stage is set. It's gonna be China-North Korea vs the US-Allies where as Iran will be eliminated much earlier to remove someone who is hazardous to the monetary system. Russia will chose to stay neutral. I think they will stay neutral which is also the wise decision due to geo-location.

What All this tariffs are showing us is that the stage is being set for the 3rd round of world war and the Americans do realize they can lose this war.

So war on terror is at this point distraction, unnecessary and one of the reasons they have fallen behind the Chinese who were just growing stronger.

The US could sign peace treaty with Taliban and other militants around the world officially ending war on terror and it's costs.

Currently this war is worth 6 trillion usd but that is not it. Another 10 trillion disappeared for military funds. You can guess where it went. We could be around 15-20 trillion by now

 

[Enigma SIG]

They can just print more dollars and raise the debt ceiling. They can play this for another century or so.

 

[Titanium100]

what a load of codswallop! it is the most lucrative business the man has ever invented
and charge the countries they invade a "fee" extra bonus is that Islam is kept underfoot

They are not fighting anybody. It's like swinging at empty spots. All muslims countries want them to fight these non-state actors because they are threat to their own throne.

All the leaders and elite in the muslim world support the American war on terror. You may ask why? It's because they view the non-state actors as a threat to their throne not civilians. So basically the Americans are viewed as a hired gun by the ruling and elite circles.

If the Americans didn't fight them they would have eventually fought with this people themselves. So in this instances they are a shield. If someone is willing to fight your war all you have to do is sit back and relax

 

[Titanium100]

Why have you been permanently banned for 13 times and still continue to make false flagger accounts?

@Saif al-Arab @al-andulas

This is my first account on PDF. Never been here before. You got emotional

no one went to Afghanistan to fight "taliban" nor to sign "peace" treaties with them but to create forward bases for a different purpose

That is a myth and parrot'ed by few people who don't understand anything. War on terror is extremely unsustainable for whoever is paying from his wealth for all these expenses. All experts in the US realize this and pro- pullng out not only in Afghanistan but other places.

anyone with a half a brain understands that this is indeed unsustainable because it's a marathon and invisible opponent who can pop up from everywhere and with longevity which adds to the cost.

Companies pull out when they lose enough money to cut their losses short this is also what is going to happen soon we are already seeing this in Afghanistan

 

[war&peace]

what a load of codswallop! it is the most lucrative business the man has ever invented

no one went to Afghanistan to fight "taliban" nor to sign "peace" treaties with them but to create forward bases for a different purpose
bollocks! nobody is eliminating Iran for they and their chabahar corridor are needed for other purposes
and charge the countries they invade a "fee" extra bonus is that Islam is kept underfoot

100% agreed.

 

[Asimzranger]

 

[Imran Khan]

USA is knee down sadly

 

[SQ8]

Keep sectarianism off the thread!

 

[beijingwalker]

Dilemma, not enough money, but too many problems and emerging rivals.

 

[xyxmt]

Keep sectarianism off the thread!

what is sectarianism?
mention of Iran?

 

[jamal18]

Every war has a defined end. 'War on Terrorism' is a war that has been designed to have no end. It is like a 'war against evil'. It is essentially eternal.

As always, two main groups hijack this. The Zionists, who turn this unstoppable train to attack their Arab enemies; and the Arms lobby, that will keep finding enemies that are an existential threat to the US. Yes gentlemen, we must spend billions of dollars on arms because there are a handful of Arabs in the desert that hate us!

 

[war&peace]

all they have to do is to print more Dollars and keep confiscating assets of other under various pretexts. Chinese will be well and truly screwed (to the tune of multi-trillion dollars) if thing get any worse between them and USA

Venezuella ...

 

[Reddington]

Every war has a defined end. 'War on Terrorism' is a war that has been designed to have no end. It is like a 'war against evil'. It is essentially eternal.

Disagree. This war has an end. The Zionists want their dream of Greater Israel fulfilled. All the genocide of Muslims in Middle-East is taking place just for this objective.

 

[jamal18]

Disagree. This war has an end. The Zionists want their dream of Greater Israel fulfilled. All the genocide of Muslims in Middle-East is taking place just for this objective.

The 'War on Terror' was a Zionist construct, they had been pushing this for years, at many conferences. What made the US jump on board was 911.

The US didn't invent this construct, the Israelis did.

 

[925boy]

They can just print more dollars and raise the debt ceiling. They can play this for another century or so.

What BS. We are not in 1990.