Hellfire2006
FULL MEMBER
Thanks for the insight sir , indeed it's not wise to compare ourselves with BD on the basis of absolute numbers since it's Highly unlikely that we'll be able to use significant force levels against them at any given time due to our commitments along our troubled frontiers. All I wanted to do was to reply to a nasty bunch of people here who feel that BD can pull off a military invasion of Assam once the demographics start favoring them. There is absolutely no point in fighting them given that our strategic interests do align quite often. The only threat which remains is the emergence of radicalism and jammat centric Islamism in Bangladesh.The weaknesses are elsewhere, not in the comparison of absolute numbers that you have put up.
The seven RAPIDs and the three armoured divisions were earlier concentrated on the western frontier. There has been a re-alignment since the latest amount of friction with the PLA, but it will take the dust a little time to settle down.
In effect, there are no formations available to engage with Bangladeshi military formations.
What was the case earlier and continues today is that there are very, very few formations facing Bangladesh. Their infantry units are lightly armed, but are most suitable for their terrain. Their armoured formations will undergo modernisation soon, as at present, the equipment is nearly obsolete.
It is highly unlikely that Bangladesh will have to defend herself against India, and her levels of equipment and air and sea forces reflect that underlying reality.
On the other hand, she has enough to guard her borders with Myanmar Rakhine and Chin; the rest of Chin, and some part of Sagaing and another small part of Kachin adjoin Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and even Arunachal Pradesh (near Walong).
It is quite possible to prepare for hostilities with Bangladesh, but why India should do so is not at all clear.
Last edited:
Consequences like what? Am I gonna get the wrong size chaddi?