Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
Wang bro it means pakistan decision to skip j10 for fc31 was right

FC31 can handle it, Chinese navy had just gone for it.
FC31 PT3 under test
![]()
A Slimmer F35A.![]()
FC-31 V2 sirFollow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wang bro it means pakistan decision to skip j10 for fc31 was right

FC31 can handle it, Chinese navy had just gone for it.
FC31 PT3 under test
![]()
A Slimmer F35A.![]()
FC-31 V2 sirLook at the wing tip
![]()
Also I can't make clear picture of on earth is of PT3. I think you might right, it seems more like a V2.Can you post V2 wingtip pics sir so i can compare with your current image thank you sir
He was probably right 15 years ago but lot has changed from tje 1990s and certainly in last 10 years. With a country having will, money, and acess to 100% Russian technology in 1990s , its not impossible to get to point now where they will equal western tech. China had the largest R&D in defence more than USA in adjusted terms.where is your arrogance comging from calling it junk?
very unfriendly and disrespectfu, you think Chinese is fool?
HMDS is not alien technology, i can easily assemble a Iphone here in my home town. whne you talk some thing in Western tone, you dont forget you are a Pakistani origin. you dont talk something you dont know.
I think PAF is smarter than you i think? let them do the choice.
1. Italy refusal in ToTDear members what I have got from here an there the Italian Vixen 1000E offered to Pak has better range than Chinese KLJ7A mean while the IRST is also in built with it. The Italian's radars are more matured and being used in past satisfactorily by Pak.
If we have to chose between the two following factors should be considered excluding cost factor.
1) Source code. ( Even Italian shall be willing in medium time span considering monetary benefits.
2) Rafael/ expected IAF stealthy/semi stealthy jets expected radar ranges.
3)IRST options whether inbuilt or podded. It is obvious that IRST with vixen is inbuilt meanwhile KLJ7A will require podded IRST covering at least on hard point.
4) Integration with expected ammo.
Both mentioned Radars may be produced in Pak in medium to long term but in short term one should be doubtful that such complicated tech shall be mastered by Pak.
The crux as per my understanding is that both options have own pros and cons, then their is another option also to consider both Radars i.e. The older version of JF 17 block-1/2 should be up graded with KLJ7A along with podded IRST. Meanwhile Block 3 for domestic use should have Vixen 1000E radar/IRST to counter Rafael/ expected future platforms. Mean while the Block 3 version for exports may be offered with KLJ7A/podded IRST, as it is obvious that Italian option shall not only be costly but Italians may be reluctant for their sensitive tech to be exported to many countries which are future potential buyers of JF17.
On one hand Pak should go for JV in case of Vixen meanwhile also go for further development of KLJ7A with our Chinese friends.
In the past Pak has helped Chinese regarding further development of their fighter jets based upon PAF experience with Western Jets.
Dear Sir, your above statement is quite positive but considering current scenario do you honestly think that Pak may get AESA from USA. On the other hand I wonder why senior members gave such ideas which are obviously can't be materialized i.e integration of Vixen with Pak F16s.
Wang bro these guys are still living in 70s 80s and early 90s so please don't mind what they are saying.where is your arrogance comging from calling it junk?
very unfriendly and disrespectfu, you think Chinese is fool?
HMDS is not alien technology, i can easily assemble a Iphone here in my home town. whne you talk some thing in Western tone, you dont forget you are a Pakistani origin. you dont talk something you dont know.
I think PAF is smarter than you i think? let them do the choice.
I feel as bad as you do what can we do with old people they become eccentric and nostalgicMy father served in the PLA army for 30 years and my uncle served in PLA navy for 20 years. I grow up in a military family. If Chinese people know a Pakistani wantonly called Chinese weapon are junk, you know the negative effect. I will keep it here, will not tell other Chinese in Chinese forum. I feel really bad! Very bad! I'm very angry at your comment!
I didn't feel so angry like today since I join this forum. It's an open insult to your ally, your best friend.
I feel you are insane.
Usually Barahtis in this forum call Chinese weapon junk, and you are the first Pakistani doing so. For Lord sake, what are you doing?
These days are getting crazy.......
I mean if PAF think Vixen is better after the evaluation, I've got nothing to say. Do you think calling Chinese HMDS junk out of no where is somehow too arbitrary and insulting? I can't accept it.
@xuxu1457 what this guy is doing is totally beyond my recognition, I don't know what to do. Just feel bad
with respect sir old horses should rest in stables lest they make more mess than young ones can clean.Discussion on how mature, pretty, adult, and patriotic Junk can be.
Custom work on the F-16 is tricky. We need U.S. approval and would have to work with both vendors (LM and whatever we're integrating to the F-16), which will be costly. In terms of the F-16, it'll always be best to procure from the U.S. In an ideal world, efforts for Harpoon Block-II AShM, JSOW, etc, could come to fruition.
The non-ITAR stuff is applicable to the JF-17. If there are Western avionics, EW/ECM and other subsystems that are non-ITAR, then these could be an option for the JF-17 (assuming the costs are right).
Young man.Wang bro these guys are still living in 70s 80s and early 90s so please don't mind what they are saying.
I feel as bad as you do what can we do with old people they become eccentric and nostalgic
China and chinese people were are and will be our iron brothers. Dont get disturbed by comments of a few eccentrics.
with respect sir old horses should rest in stables lest they make more mess than young ones can clean.
It was the best, safest and most logical solution all along..since the appearance of the KLJ-7A in the Show it was said that the radar was specifically made for the JF-17.. going for something else, would have been more expansive and risky..let alone the ToT part of the deal..So its KLJ7A all the way and it's as good as it can get.
Wang brother, your anger is justified and the rubbish about old people verses new people ends HERE AND NOW! Hey, "old people" listen up loud and clear from ME, another old person... just because you maybe a PAF veteran does not make you an authority over anything. This "maroobiat" slave mentality is prevalent among people of south Asia and albeit it is thankfully receding,b it is still there and effects all of us to one degree or another to an extent where any piece of junk that is even remotely western makes our eyes light up. I know because i have military veterans in my own family and SOME of them think exactly like that, thankfully most don't. Well here is the cold harsh reality about the Chinese "junk":where is your arrogance comging from calling it junk?
very unfriendly and disrespectfu, you think Chinese is fool?
HMDS is not alien technology, i can easily assemble a Iphone here in my home town. whne you talk some thing in Western tone, you dont forget you are a Pakistani origin. you dont talk something you dont know.
I think PAF is smarter than you i think? let them do the choice.
If man kind can go from first flight to jet engine in 30 years why cant china acheive So much in 30 years when it has all the ingredients to do so.