What's new

Wheels of Justice in India

Makaramarma

BANNED
Jul 15, 2014
1,043
-4
1,053
Country
India
Location
India
Salman Hit & Run Case: Will Ravindra Patil get justice? | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis

0000rpatil.jpg


In the wee hours of September 28, 2002, a drunk Salman Khan rammed his speeding special utility vehicle (SUV) on a pavement, mowing down one person and severely injuring six others. However, the incident also triggered loss of another life -- five years later. It was that of Salman’s bodyguard, constable Ravindra Patil, who was an eye-witness to the accident. Little must have the then 25-year-old Patil realised that the incident will reduce a well-built and handsome commando to a pile of bones weighing a mere 30kg in five years. Patil finally succumbed to tuberculosis on October 4, 2007 at a young age of 30.

A young boy from Satara, Patil joined the Mumbai Police as a constable and was trained as a commando to join the Special Operations Squad (SOS) which has a primary duty of guarding VIPs. In, 2002, Patil was assigned duty as Salman’s bodyguard.

On the fateful night, Patil was travelling in the SUV with Salman behind wheels. Immediately after the accident, Salman vanished from the spot, while Patil rushed to the Bandra police station – to fulfill his duties as a citizen as well as a policeman – for the first information report (FIR).

Patil gave his statement to the police based on which the FIR was registered. He later stood by his statement in the court at the time of trial. The prosecution on Wednesday claimed that Patil's statement has been the single-most important piece of evidence based on which the court finally convicted Salman after 13 long years.

On the night of the incident, Patil probably would not have realised what was in store for him. He could not have imagined that just by being in the car at the time of the accident and performing his duties would cost him so dearly – eventually his life.

The Bandra police finally managed to arrest Salman based on the statement given by Patil that the actor was driving the SUV at the time of the accident. Patil’s woes had just begun.

Being a ‘prime witness’ in a high-profile case, Patil was removed from his duties as an SOS commando. People close to him maintained that Patil was under increasing pressure to retract his statement given to the police. Even though it was never revealed who was pressurising him, it was clear that tremendous pressure was being put on Patil – he was physically and mentally crumbling.

Being a low-rung constable in the mighty Mumbai Police did not help Patil, because he was also tactfully isolated by his own department. He started abstaining from duty and would spend time away from Mumbai.

During the trial, it was clear to everyone, the only solid evidence that the police had, was Patil’s eye-witness account. There were a total of 27 witnesses in the case, but Patil was the prime witness who could turn the case around. However, when it was Patil’s turn to give his testimony in the court, he disappeared. Those close to him said that since he was isolated he did not have the courage to stand in the court. Many felt, that, it was the Mumbai Police which should have stood by him, ensured that being a prime witness and a policeman he should be protected. But, none of that happened and Patil continued to stay away from court.

In fact, when he disappeared, a missing complaint was also filed by his brother. Rumours started doing rounds that Patil was being pressurised to stay away from the trial.

Things took an ugly turn for Patil when the court did not appreciate the fact that he was staying away from the trial. His absence was delaying the already delayed trial. When the police were asked about Patil's whereabouts, the court was told that he had gone on leave without informing the department.

Based on this information, the court issued a warrant against Patil and ordered the police to arrest him. Mumbai Police dealt a double whammy to Patil by dismissing him from service on the charges of going on leave without permission.

When Patil was finally found in a hotel in Mahabaleshwar, his very own department promptly arrested him and he was sent to jail. Here again, Patil may have never imagined that he would be arrested in the very case in which he was a complainant and had himself registered an FIR.

Ironically, when Patil finally deposed in the case in March 2006, he was still in jail. One can only imagine what must have gone through a policeman who is a trained commando but ended up in a dingy cell of Arthur Road jail in a case in which he is a prime witness. “It was Patil's testimony which helped in convicting Salman Khan on all charges and sentencing him to undergo five years imprisonment,” said public prosecutor Pradeep Gharat.

After being released from jail, Patil again went missing. No one, including his family, knew where he was. There are reports that he had gone to his mother’s place in Dhule district. In the interim period, he was dismissed from the police department. This meant that his salary was stopped and he was left without any job. He even reportedly got divorced from his wife after being released from jail. Patil later even claimed that his family had abandoned him.

In September 2007, months after he had gone missing, Patil was found in the Sewri TB hospital. Such was his physical condition that at first no one recognised him nor did anyone know that he was the main witness in the Salman Khan hit-and-run case. He was reduced to a pile of bones and weighed a mere 30 kg. He was diagonised with a deadly type of TB with little hope of survival.

According to the hospital staff, Patil had reached the hospital in a pitiable condition and was unable to move or even speak. Patil had reportedly told the doctors that he was begging on the streets of Mumbai and had managed to collect Rs 50 to hire a cab to come to the hospital.

Doctors said that due to the enormous stress that Patil had undergone in five years, his body was unable to take pressure any further and he had developed a strain of TB which had turned fatal. He lost the battle for his life on October 4, 2007.

Barely a few days before his death, Patil reportedly told a section of the media that the accident had destroyed his life.

On Wednesday, the Sessions Court delivered justice to the victims of the accident, but, the deceased Patil still awaits justice.
 
tragic tragic :( ...No doubt people don't come forward to help because the system is so fukcingly disgusted.....what was court doing?? Is proper implementation of witness protection program not in judiciary's interest??
 
How about this ?

Blogger Deletes Posts On Ravindra Patil. Issues A Public Apology To Salman Khan | Lighthouse Insights

Why is the world (to be read as governments and people in power) scared about the social media and blogging. The reason being the common man today has become a publisher. But such powers are not being appreciated and we are constantly being reminded through social media regulation and blog post deletions. Many cases in the past have involved influential people getting bad content about them removed from the Internet.

Blogger Soumyadipta Banerjee asked to delete his post
The latest victim is Soumyadipta Banerjee (SB), film critic and journalist writing on Indian Commercial Cinema. Apart from working as a Chief Bureau at Bennett, Coleman and Co. Ltd. (Times Group), SB has been maintaining a popular blog – BollywoodJournalist and a Facebook page –Bollywoodbingo, a community that supports the blog.

Of late the blogger had posted a blog vividly describing the life and death of Constable Ravindra Patil, the only eye witness in Salman Khan’s famous 2002 Hit-and-Run-case. The post was one of the best I had read in recent times and it had garnered a lot of eyeballs. While the post found many supporters, many didn’t like it too and in this was Bollywood heartthrob Salman Khan. The blogger was asked to delete two of his posts – 1) Ravindra Patil: The death of a messenger, and 2) The Wretched Witness – another post that spoke about the witness. There is a Google Cache version of the first blog post but nothing for the second one. Update: Here is the Google cache version of the second blog post too.

Excerpts of the blog post – Ravindra Patil: The death of a messenger
In his post – “Ravindra Patil: The death of a messenger”, SB talks about the famous 2002 hit and run case and how the constable who was the prime witness found himself in the epicentre of controversy. The post starts with the enormous pressure he was put under to change his statement. Quoting from the blog post –

“There were many who wanted Patil to change his statement. They preferred that Patil maintain that Salman leaned back to listen to him seconds before he lost control of the wheel. This would mean that the accident was caused by a ‘human error’ and not because he was drunk. Some people wanted him to say that Salman was not drunk at the time of the accident.”

But Constable Ravindra didn’t change his statement. And what followed later in the life of a witness is really shameful in a country like India which calls itself the biggest democracy in the world. Scared, Constable Ravindra started avoiding the unwanted attention he was getting from all quarters. In doing so, Patil was missing in the witness box and to the biggest surprise Patil ended up being locked in the Arthur Road jail.

“In a strange twist of fate, a man who had actually lodged the first information report against Salman Khan now had an arrest warrant issued against him for not turning up at court hearings. The arrest warrant was issued after he failed to appear for five consecutive court dates.

As the judge ordered that he be arrested and produced in court, his seniors at the police force simultaneously approved that Patil be sacked from his job because he was absent from duty. His seniors chose to ignore the fact that technically Patil was ‘missing’ and not ‘absent’ according to their own records.

Nobody was interested in knowing why he had run away from his house. Or, why the same person who was so forthcoming in lodging a complaint against a Bollywood star like Salman Khan, didn’t want to take the witness-box. Patil was never put under any witness protection programme.”

Patil ended up in a separate cell like he was an armed dacoit or a serial killer. At the same time, he was sacked from his job. The most shocking end was well said by SB,

“A witness was suddenly at the receiving end of it all. Life was dealing this grand witness blows after blows while Salman Khan delivered hits after hits at the box office.”

And after Patil was let out of jail, his family disowned him and the Mumbai Police anyways did not support him too. Patil went missing and was finally discovered at the Sewri Municipal hospital in 2007, while he had contracted drug-resistant tuberculosis which fast-tracked him towards an inevitable end.

Constable Ravindra Patil died on October 4, 2007.

Public Apology from Soumyadipta Banerjee
Deleting the posts was not enough. SP had to write an apology to Salman Khan. This was the last post from the blogger, who has also added that he is taking a break from writing on his blog till he is in a proper frame of mind.


The question remains – Why was Soumyadipta Banerjee asked to pull off his blog posts? The content that he has shared is nothing new; it has been in the public domain. The video by NDTV says it all.

The blogger has not revealed the reason as to why was he asked to delete his blog post and what was the public apology for. I’m not sure if some facts in the blog post were misleading or causing harm to Salman Khan’s reputation, but then you can always edit it if that was the case. Deleting a blog post questions a citizen’s right to freedom of expression.

After online privacy becoming a myth, will freedom of speech meet the same fate? Do you think that deletion of blog posts is justified?
 
Efforts were made by Salman's lawyers to start the trial afresh where Patil's statement wouldn't have been considered at all. This piece of sh!t got away with just a wrap on the knuckles.
 
Efforts were made by Salman's lawyers to start the trial afresh where Patil's statement wouldn't have been considered at all. This piece of sh!t got away with just a wrap on the knuckles.

Salman Khan did what any criminal would do to escape jail.

The real piece of $hit who really got away without even a rap on the knuckles is the cops who let this happen. No doubt they got promoted and will retire in honour.

Mr Salman Khan - Bollywood Journalist

FA6WUcU4_400x400.jpeg



I have received a communication from Mr Salman Khan. There I have been instructed to remove two blog posts that I have written about him

The last two days have been really excruciating for me.

I have received a communication from Mr Salman Khan. There I have been instructed to remove two blog posts that I have written about him.

Those articles have been removed from this blog.

Here's a public apology to Mr Salman Khan for writing two blog posts that he didn't consider appropriate.

I am taking a break from writing on this blog till I am in a proper frame of mind to write again.

I am really sorry.
 
Last edited:
What about Salman' being Human stupidity...no one helped Patil...

Good lord. "being Human" is not a charity, its the name of his Business venture.

So for the record, its doing VERY well. Turn over of around Rs. 225 Crores just for this year. Rs. 350 Crores next year . :coffee:

Salman Khan's Being Human follows an unusual revenue model - Business Today

Salman Khan’s Being Human to clock Rs 225 crore turnover by FY 2015 - timesofindia-economictimes

Salman Khans Being Human eyes 60% turnover growth in 3 years - NDTVProfit.com

Salman Khan’s 'Being Human' Aims To Touch Rs 350 Crore By 2015!
 
I've known about Ravindra Pail for years. One reason why I never spend any money or watch Salman Khan movies. It is criminal and unpatriotic to make him survive when he has so abused and attacked an honest man. I think Indian people should boycott his movies and the celebs who are supporting him.
I seriously didn't know about Mr.Ravindra Patil,i was blindly supporting Salman because i thought that he was a good human being but now this article has opened my eyes and made me realize that Salman Khan is indeed a despicable human being:tdown:!!(Btw let's make a truce between us,we may share different political ideologies but we are compatriots and hence shouldn't fight openly in an international forum.What's your say:-)?)
 
I seriously didn't know about Mr.Ravindra Patil,i was blindly supporting Salman because i thought that he was a good human being but now this article has opened my eyes and made me realize that Salman Khan is indeed a despicable human being:tdown:!!(Btw let's make a truce between us,we may share different political ideologies but we are compatriots and hence shouldn't fight openly in an international forum.What's your say:-)?)

Salman Khan is a scumbag of the first order. He should have been behind bars years ago. Surviving because of his mafia connections. I have never bought a single Being Human product in my life and am proud of it.


Well I'm ok for a truce. I won't insult you but of course I will attack parties I'm against :enjoy:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom