What's new

What were the key outcomes from the G20 summit?

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 8, 2018
4,643
-1
4,053
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
What were the key outcomes from the G20 summit?

2 December 2018

stream_4fb4b958-d9c2-42d6-8b1a-6322021a159c.jpg

Leaders and their partners pose for a group photo prior to a gala dinner at the Colon Theatre in Buenos Aires

Leaders of the world’s largest economic powers have agreed to overhaul the global body that regulates trade disputes, but they faced resistance from US President Donald Trump over the Paris accord on climate change.

Here are some of the main developments at the G20 summit in Argentina, which wrapped up on Saturday.

  • World Trade Organisation
All G20 leaders called for reforming the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the issue will be discussed during the group’s next summit in Osaka, Japan, in June.

The gathering’s final statement, however, did not mention protectionism after negotiators said the US objected to the wording. Mr Trump has criticised the WTO and adopted aggressive trade policies targeting China and the European Union.

  • US-China trade war
stream_0a311331-7570-4f0a-92fc-7b48f9ef8657.jpg

Donald Trump with Xi Jinping during their bilateral meeting in Buenos Aires

Financial markets will be cheered by the announcement that Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed at a dinner after the summit to have a 90-day truce in their trade battle.

Mr Trump agreed to hold off on plans to raise tariffs on January 1 on 200 billion dollars in Chinese goods. Mr Xi agreed to buy a “not yet agreed upon, but very substantial amount of agricultural, energy, industrial” and other products from the United States to reduce America’s huge trade deficit with China, the White House said.

The ceasefire will buy time for the two countries to work out their differences in a dispute over Beijing’s aggressive drive to supplant US technological dominance.

  • Prince under pressure
There were some awkward moments for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as some leaders called him out over the gruesome October killing of dissident Saudi newspaper columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the country’s consulate in Istanbul.

French President Emmanuel Macron was captured on video seemingly lecturing Mr bin Salman, at one point being heard saying “I am worried,” “you never listen to me,” and “I am a man of my word.” Mr Macron said the crown prince only “took note” of his concerns.

British Prime Minister Theresa May also said she pressed Mr bin Salman.

stream_img.jpg

Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (centre) is under pressure.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was the only G20 leader to raise the issue during the official session. Mr Erdogan called Mr bin Salman’s response – that the crime had not been proven – “unbelievable” and complained that Saudi authorities have been unco-operative.

But it was not all bad for Mr bin Salman. He was not shunned, and on the gathering’s first day, he and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a hearty grip-and-grin as the two seemingly revelled in their shared status as relative outcasts.

US intelligence agencies concluded the Saudi prince was behind the killing. Saudi Arabia denies he played a role.

  • Ukraine conflict
stream_2f6baeb8-75bb-4c07-a509-90294c4366c1.jpg

Mr Putin speaks at the presidential palace in Buenos Aires.

Western leaders confronted Mr Putin over Russia’s recent seizure of Ukrainian naval vessels and crews, but the diplomatic pressure did not seem to bring either side closer to solving the conflict. Russia and Ukraine have accused each other of being responsible for the standoff.

Mr Trump cited Russia’s actions as the reason that he cancelled a planned meeting with Mr Putin on the sidelines of the summit. EU Council president Donald Tusk sharply criticised “Russia’s aggression” against Ukraine.

Mr Putin tried to convince Mr Trump and the leaders of France and Germany that Russia’s actions were justified – even pulling out a piece of paper and drawing a map of the disputed area to make his point.

  • Climate change
The final communique signed by all 20 member nations said 19 of them reaffirmed their commitment to the Paris climate accord. The only holdout was the US, which has withdrawn from the pact under Mr Trump.

Still, environmental groups praised the statement as welcome news.

“That G20 leaders signed up to the Paris Agreement reaffirmed their commitment to its full implementation in the resulting communique is important,” the World Wildlife Fund said. “It is also a reflection of the Argentinian government rightly making climate an important topic on the agenda.”

Greenpeace said that “the necessity of the US being part of the effort to fight climate change cannot be denied, but this is a demonstration that the US is still the odd one out”.

  • NAFTA
stream_09a80465-138f-4e80-9ab5-1e383959a028.jpg

Mr Trump, Canada’s PM Justin Trudeau, right, and Mexico’s President Enrique Pena Nieto at the USMCA signing ceremony

After two years of negotiations, Mr Trump signed a revised North American trade pact with the leaders of Canada and Mexico on the sidelines of the summit. The deal is meant to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which Mr Trump long denigrated as a “disaster”.

The new pact will not take effect unless approved by the legislatures of all three nations, and there are questions about the pact’s prospects in the US Congress, especially now that Democrats will control the House. Democrats and their allies in the labour movement are already demanding changes.

But Mr Trump said on the way back to Washington that he plans to formally terminate NAFTA, so Congress will have to choose between accepting the new pact or going without a trade accord.

  • Low expectations – low output
Even the host country had lowered expectations ahead of the summit, saying before the gathering started that it might not be possible to reach a consensus for a final statement.

After sleepless days of round-the-clock talks by diplomats, a communique was produced, but analysts said leaders merely signed a watered down statement that skirted trade and other contentious issues.

stream_a29aaf81-4904-42f5-ba1f-1d2f82a89be8.jpg

World leaders gather for a group photo at the start of the G20 summit

“The G20 veered all over the road” at the summit and the leaders failed to fix trade, which is widely seen as a priority for boosting growth in jobs and economies, said Thomas Bernes, a distinguished fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation who has held leading roles with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and Canada’s government.

“Leaders buried their differences in obscure language and dropped language to fight protectionism, which had been included in every G20 communique since the leaders’ first summit. This is clearly a retrograde step forced by United States intransigence,” Mr Bernes said.

https://www.itv.com/news/2018-12-02/what-were-the-key-outcomes-at-the-g20-summit/
 
A failed gathering. All we saw was an angry orange baby and a lot of division. China is the clear winner. Forced orangeman to halt trade tarrif war.
 
Last edited:
Its no body's fault if you are not a part of this gathering, so calm down.

LOL Who the fvck wants to be part of an angry mob where everyone is pointing a finger at each other?

We are fine without it. I heard daddy America can't go on with their tarrif war? Need some more worshipping tonight.

kr_f.jpg
 
What were the key outcomes from the G20 summit?

2 December 2018

stream_4fb4b958-d9c2-42d6-8b1a-6322021a159c.jpg

Leaders and their partners pose for a group photo prior to a gala dinner at the Colon Theatre in Buenos Aires

Leaders of the world’s largest economic powers have agreed to overhaul the global body that regulates trade disputes, but they faced resistance from US President Donald Trump over the Paris accord on climate change.

Here are some of the main developments at the G20 summit in Argentina, which wrapped up on Saturday.

  • World Trade Organisation
All G20 leaders called for reforming the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the issue will be discussed during the group’s next summit in Osaka, Japan, in June.

The gathering’s final statement, however, did not mention protectionism after negotiators said the US objected to the wording. Mr Trump has criticised the WTO and adopted aggressive trade policies targeting China and the European Union.

  • US-China trade war
stream_0a311331-7570-4f0a-92fc-7b48f9ef8657.jpg

Donald Trump with Xi Jinping during their bilateral meeting in Buenos Aires

Financial markets will be cheered by the announcement that Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed at a dinner after the summit to have a 90-day truce in their trade battle.

Mr Trump agreed to hold off on plans to raise tariffs on January 1 on 200 billion dollars in Chinese goods. Mr Xi agreed to buy a “not yet agreed upon, but very substantial amount of agricultural, energy, industrial” and other products from the United States to reduce America’s huge trade deficit with China, the White House said.

The ceasefire will buy time for the two countries to work out their differences in a dispute over Beijing’s aggressive drive to supplant US technological dominance.

  • Prince under pressure
There were some awkward moments for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as some leaders called him out over the gruesome October killing of dissident Saudi newspaper columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the country’s consulate in Istanbul.

French President Emmanuel Macron was captured on video seemingly lecturing Mr bin Salman, at one point being heard saying “I am worried,” “you never listen to me,” and “I am a man of my word.” Mr Macron said the crown prince only “took note” of his concerns.

British Prime Minister Theresa May also said she pressed Mr bin Salman.

stream_img.jpg

Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (centre) is under pressure.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was the only G20 leader to raise the issue during the official session. Mr Erdogan called Mr bin Salman’s response – that the crime had not been proven – “unbelievable” and complained that Saudi authorities have been unco-operative.

But it was not all bad for Mr bin Salman. He was not shunned, and on the gathering’s first day, he and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a hearty grip-and-grin as the two seemingly revelled in their shared status as relative outcasts.

US intelligence agencies concluded the Saudi prince was behind the killing. Saudi Arabia denies he played a role.

  • Ukraine conflict
stream_2f6baeb8-75bb-4c07-a509-90294c4366c1.jpg

Mr Putin speaks at the presidential palace in Buenos Aires.

Western leaders confronted Mr Putin over Russia’s recent seizure of Ukrainian naval vessels and crews, but the diplomatic pressure did not seem to bring either side closer to solving the conflict. Russia and Ukraine have accused each other of being responsible for the standoff.

Mr Trump cited Russia’s actions as the reason that he cancelled a planned meeting with Mr Putin on the sidelines of the summit. EU Council president Donald Tusk sharply criticised “Russia’s aggression” against Ukraine.

Mr Putin tried to convince Mr Trump and the leaders of France and Germany that Russia’s actions were justified – even pulling out a piece of paper and drawing a map of the disputed area to make his point.

  • Climate change
The final communique signed by all 20 member nations said 19 of them reaffirmed their commitment to the Paris climate accord. The only holdout was the US, which has withdrawn from the pact under Mr Trump.

Still, environmental groups praised the statement as welcome news.

“That G20 leaders signed up to the Paris Agreement reaffirmed their commitment to its full implementation in the resulting communique is important,” the World Wildlife Fund said. “It is also a reflection of the Argentinian government rightly making climate an important topic on the agenda.”

Greenpeace said that “the necessity of the US being part of the effort to fight climate change cannot be denied, but this is a demonstration that the US is still the odd one out”.

  • NAFTA
stream_09a80465-138f-4e80-9ab5-1e383959a028.jpg

Mr Trump, Canada’s PM Justin Trudeau, right, and Mexico’s President Enrique Pena Nieto at the USMCA signing ceremony

After two years of negotiations, Mr Trump signed a revised North American trade pact with the leaders of Canada and Mexico on the sidelines of the summit. The deal is meant to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which Mr Trump long denigrated as a “disaster”.

The new pact will not take effect unless approved by the legislatures of all three nations, and there are questions about the pact’s prospects in the US Congress, especially now that Democrats will control the House. Democrats and their allies in the labour movement are already demanding changes.

But Mr Trump said on the way back to Washington that he plans to formally terminate NAFTA, so Congress will have to choose between accepting the new pact or going without a trade accord.

  • Low expectations – low output
Even the host country had lowered expectations ahead of the summit, saying before the gathering started that it might not be possible to reach a consensus for a final statement.

After sleepless days of round-the-clock talks by diplomats, a communique was produced, but analysts said leaders merely signed a watered down statement that skirted trade and other contentious issues.

stream_a29aaf81-4904-42f5-ba1f-1d2f82a89be8.jpg

World leaders gather for a group photo at the start of the G20 summit

“The G20 veered all over the road” at the summit and the leaders failed to fix trade, which is widely seen as a priority for boosting growth in jobs and economies, said Thomas Bernes, a distinguished fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation who has held leading roles with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and Canada’s government.

“Leaders buried their differences in obscure language and dropped language to fight protectionism, which had been included in every G20 communique since the leaders’ first summit. This is clearly a retrograde step forced by United States intransigence,” Mr Bernes said.

https://www.itv.com/news/2018-12-02/what-were-the-key-outcomes-at-the-g20-summit/

enough!
why not have an internet video meeting?
 
A failed gathering. All we saw was an angry orange baby and a lot of division. China is the clear winner. Forced orangeman to halt trade tarrif war.

Indeed, China is clearly the winner. But do remember to say the same when you see USA reduce the trade deficit QoQ and YoY from here on. o_Oo_Oo_O

I guess it will be another topic of discussion then. :-)
 
  • World Trade Organisation
All G20 leaders called for reforming the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the issue will be discussed during the group’s next summit in Osaka, Japan, in June.

The gathering’s final statement, however, did not mention protectionism after negotiators said the US objected to the wording. Mr Trump has criticised the WTO and adopted aggressive trade policies targeting China and the European Union.

  • US-China trade war
stream_0a311331-7570-4f0a-92fc-7b48f9ef8657.jpg

Donald Trump with Xi Jinping during their bilateral meeting in Buenos Aires

Financial markets will be cheered by the announcement that Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed at a dinner after the summit to have a 90-day truce in their trade battle.

Mr Trump agreed to hold off on plans to raise tariffs on January 1 on 200 billion dollars in Chinese goods. Mr Xi agreed to buy a “not yet agreed upon, but very substantial amount of agricultural, energy, industrial” and other products from the United States to reduce America’s huge trade deficit with China, the White House said.

The ceasefire will buy time for the two countries to work out their differences in a dispute over Beijing’s aggressive drive to supplant US technological dominance.

There needs to be a way in which the world trade entities can by-pass economic sanctions enforced by third countries. One way I see is to increase the WTO funding proportionately and reduce the US/China/UK/France and other big economies funding in proportion. Basically the more someone funds, the more shots they call.

If other G20 members volunteer to increase WTO funding, this will reduce excessive skew towards one or two power centres.

This is in addition to hard bargaining and willingness to stand up against economic bullying.

  • Prince under pressure
There were some awkward moments for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as some leaders called him out over the gruesome October killing of dissident Saudi newspaper columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the country’s consulate in Istanbul.

French President Emmanuel Macron was captured on video seemingly lecturing Mr bin Salman, at one point being heard saying “I am worried,” “you never listen to me,” and “I am a man of my word.” Mr Macron said the crown prince only “took note” of his concerns.

British Prime Minister Theresa May also said she pressed Mr bin Salman.

Every country has its strategic interests. I don't understand what the heck is the big deal with this Khashoggi's death.

Was he the president of another country?

Was he a senior diplomat under UN conventions's protection, of another country?

Britain, France, UK, USA... all have troubles that they dealing with internally.

But pressuring a ruler for an assassination attempt? I was expecting Turks and Saudis to discuss this internally between themselves rather than whole Europe launching itself over them.
 
One way I see is to increase the WTO funding proportionately and reduce the US/China/UK/France and other big economies funding in proportion. Basically the more someone funds, the more shots they call.

If other G20 members volunteer to increase WTO funding, this will reduce excessive skew towards one or two power centres.
But if G20 economies would fund the WTO more proportionally, then there still would be two power centres, but not the United States and China.
It would be the G20 and the rest of the world.
It would make rich countries and some currently poor countries richer, but it would also make the rest of the poor countries poorer.

Every country has its strategic interests. I don't understand what the heck is the big deal with this Khashoggi's death.

Was he the president of another country?

Was he a senior diplomat under UN conventions's protection, of another country?

Britain, France, UK, USA... all have troubles that they dealing with internally.

But pressuring a ruler for an assassination attempt? I was expecting Turks and Saudis to discuss this internally between themselves rather than whole Europe launching itself over them.
Nobody really gives anything about Khashoggi.
(well, maybe except for other journalists)

He just provides an opportunity to criticize and attack Saudi Arabia and many countries, like Turkey, use that opportunity, for their own goals.

But the real question is, why did the same countries not criticize and attack Saudi Arabia for the war in Yemen, where thousands of people have died?
You would think, considering the number of deaths, that would be a bigger problem, than the death of some unknown journalist.

Maybe Stalin was right in that regard:
“If only one man dies (of hunger), that is a tragedy. If millions die, that’s only statistics.”

The death of one Khashoggi is easier to exploit, than that of thousands Yemenis.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom