We "may" get some money from transit

[Roybot]

You blind dude? We're not talking about any particular country here. We have every right to criticize our ministers and we don't need your input. Thanks and buzz off!

You lots are blind, if anyone is. Blind with hatred. And no I don't need your "approval" for giving my inputs.


"Maybe we have got some money from this" as opposed to " We may get some money for transit". Past tense and future tense.

Your minister was talking about that particular case, where two train load of fertilizer was transported from Bangladesh to Nepal through India.

How the hell is this this guy a minister?? He is formulating the deal for bangladesh, he is the one who is going to set the price yet he doesnt have a idea about the amount of money he wants our neighbours to pay us.

He is a fine finance minister. whats wrong with him?
He speaks the truth. Giving transit is a political decision and nothing to do with finance ministry.

We should demand what the amount the Indian would need to incur if they didn't get the transit even we don't count the time save by the transit facility . India is saving approximately 1 days and more then 1000 km from kolkata port to agartala and if the get the chance to use Chittagong port they will reach the port using only 78 km .

If you are right then its not the problem Nepal is small country we should not expect any significant amount from them but if its come to transit to Indian then its undoubtedly a mockery or betrayal with nation . because this ALr and their cohort were telling us we are going to become Singapore by giving transit to india and will earn billions of dollar .

 

[Maira La]

You lots are blind, if anyone is. Blind with hatred. And no I don't need your "approval" for giving my inputs.


"Maybe we have got some money from this" as opposed to " We may get some money for transit". Past tense and future tense.

Your minister was talking about that particular case, where two train load of fertilizer was transported from Bangladesh to Nepal through India.

You really hate me, don't you? Fancy birdy pics aside, I understand you don't see a connection between the thread's title and the article's title, right matey? Do they necessarily have to be the same?

I made up the thread title to make a point: our Finance Minister thinks money is not the priority here. So it's all "maybe"s and "may"s when it comes to profiting from transit.

And no point artificially inflating your thread with all those quotes. Nothing to do with me. Stick to the topic and if you feel BD members are digressing, politely ask them to get back on track.

 

[Roybot]

You really hate me, don't you? Fancy birdy pics aside, I understand you don't see a connection between the thread's title and the article's title, right matey? Do they necessarily have to be the same?

I made up the thread title to make a point: our Finance Minister thinks money is not the priority here. So it's all "maybe"s and "may"s when it comes to profiting from transit.

And no point artificially inflating your thread with all those quotes. Nothing to do with me. Stick to the topic and if you feel BD members are digressing, politely ask them to get back on track.

Nothing to do with you? Neither was my initial post, don't see why you felt the need to reply to my post addressed to the "slow ones".

And no I don't have the any issues with you changing the threads titles. Its quoting out of context is what I objected to.