Yaar 30 Rafale kiyaa ukhaar lein gey?This is all a step by step process of influencing public opinion to get a 2nd tranche of Rafales.
Jabb 250 SU-30 Fail ho gaey?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yaar 30 Rafale kiyaa ukhaar lein gey?This is all a step by step process of influencing public opinion to get a 2nd tranche of Rafales.
Yaar 30 Rafale kiyaa ukhaar lein gey?
Jabb 250 SU-30 Fail ho gaey?
Chalou aanay Dou Rafale..Think about the story this way. MKI did not get shot down, but Mig-21 shot down F-16.
Anyway, even if 1 MKI got shot down, it was just 1 skirmish. When it comes to aircraft of similar generation, you win some, you lose some.
Regardless Rafale numbers are necessary to climb to 72 over the next few years, especially considering China in the mix, and the Rafales are needed to take out SAM sites. So it doesn't change anything anyway.
Can't say about Su30 unless we get some evidence, but About mig 21,It was very close dog fight even enemy chased us and we shot it down. I am ruling out BVR, It was WVR fight.see @pakistanipower WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT? BVR and i told u that it was a record distance BVR kill of Su30MKI
Chalou aanay Dou Rafale..
Hamaray waloon kou bhii J-31 Khareednay Kii wajah Mill jaey gii
In current situation, such statements serves two purposes as 1) for support of Rafale & forcing Indian SC to back down
2) just tell that how PAF owned the battle while IAF was helpless.......... just because this is election time, issue confession & then direct online media trolls to sugar coat the same as a political stunt/Rafale love so the people will get used to it and forget what really happened. Bravo strategy in these times.
These should have been 2 separate points. This is for supporting the Rafales, indeed. But this in no way interferes with the SC process. The SC will quash this petition also.
We had to take defensive measures at all times after the Balakot strike as the Pakistani air force had greater BVR missile capabilities - Air Marshal Nohwar.
Basically they were surprised, shockedApparently, this tweet somewhat goes against the present government. It implies, though very subtly, that the Balakot strikes were carried out, without giving due considerations to its implications.
What about two fronts war?The story is we wouldn't have lost Mig-21 had it been for Rafales. But we know that in real life, even with Rafale, the Mig-21 would have been shot down anyway, in the same scenario.
.Majority indian said here su30 & Rafale were for china only, while upgraded mig2000, Jaguars, Mig29, mig27 & upgraded mig 21 were enough against Pakistan 3.5 and 4 gen fighters.What about two fronts war?.Majority indian said here su30 & Rafale were for china only, while upgraded mig2000, Jaguars, Mig29, mig27 & upgraded mig 21 were enough against Pakistan 3.5 and 4 gen fighters.
Never rush to reply for the sack of reply only...
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indi...-stand-on-rafale-papers.613027/#post-11361172
What about two fronts war?.Majority indian said here su30 & Rafale were for china only, while upgraded mig2000, Jaguars, Mig29, mig27 & upgraded mig 21 were enough against Pakistan 3.5 and 4 gen fighters.
I am indeed referring to the above. There's nothing to implicate anyone of any wrongdoing in these papers.
Mig was shot down in WVR by Pl5EII missile and Su30 in BVR with SD10A.Can't say about Su30 unless we get some evidence, but About mig 21,It was very close dog fight even enemy chased us and we shot it down. I am ruling out BVR, It was WVR fight.