I take it you speak from extensive personal experience in the military.
Hold on a sec. I thought that most of the people here have had extensive personal experience in the military? How else could they be such experts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I take it you speak from extensive personal experience in the military.
I don't think it will come to that. Besides, the PLAAF cannot afford to mobilize most of their combat aircraft against Vietnam without reducing their projection ability in other air commands. Understand?
To do so would be a strategic blunder.
Am still trying to figure out this 'expert' comment: 'Most of US weapons works well inside US military system. But once leave it, these weapons will not be so good.'Hold on a sec. I thought that most of the people here have had extensive personal experience in the military? How else could they be such experts?
I take it you speak from extensive personal experience in the military.
Am still trying to figure out this 'expert' comment: 'Most of US weapons works well inside US military system. But once leave it, these weapons will not be so good.'

Am still trying to figure out this 'expert' comment: 'Most of US weapons works well inside US military system. But once leave it, these weapons will not be so good.'

@SvenSvensonov in the USN (personally I think he comes across more as an intelligence officer than a submariner/electronic warfare type)
Hold on a sec. I thought that most of the people here have had extensive personal experience in the military? How else could they be such experts?
My hunch; he's part of ONI ; Office of Naval Intelligence.
Guy knows overwhelming information on naval systems.
Plus he's also a Ph.D candidate like myself.
LOL!


to becoming an armchair general is not much difficult, take a keyboard and start spouting nonsense....
to becoming an armchair general is not much difficult, take a keyboard and start spouting nonsense....
The problem is that the comment is overly vague, so much so that it is applicable to anything/anyone. A Spetznaz operator works very well inside the Russian military system, but put him into the Chicago ghetto and he is dead meat. Does that make sense to you ?I see nothing wrong.
For example, U.S. drones work well inside US military system but once you deploy them overseas... wait a second!![]()
Why did you avoid my question? How much can vietnam buy with vietnam mediocre budget. As if US will gift advanced blk 52 or aegis destroyer to vietnam free. They will probably gift those old junks to vietnam.The nervousness here is that Viet Nam WILL be just one step closer to the US and by extension, closer to other Asian US allies, such as Japan and South Korea, in the region.
No worse than Chinese weapons such as jet fighters where the only method of attack is collision -- Hainan Incident.

I did not avoid your question. You are not smart enough to understand the context of my original comment. It is not about the quantity of how much Viet Nam can buy from US, it is about the inevitable favorable relationship between the two countries. Your Chinese leadership is more farsighted than you are.Why did you avoid my question?
Make an intelligent comment and the Hainan Incident will remain in the background. LordTiredanus is not a very intelligent member here.And why are u so insecure to mention hainan incident which is irrelevant in this context. Is it becos you try to hide the miserable military budget dwarfs by China one?![]()