What's new

US STATE DEPERTMENT denies of the Nato stolen containers & its weapons in pakistan

Daah is it mandatory that NLC if transported containers will check what is inside those containers? We receive daily shipments but transporters are not NLC. I am confused please elaborate on role of NLC in this?
Nlc is the Carier hired by the company who is at the receiving end or it can be a packege deal between sender & receiver ?
But not only NLC was the logestical carrier carrying these containers to Afghanistan ?
Private carriers were also involved in shipping those containers but the fact of the matter is the security of the containers & their routes ?
Due to the accord between USA Pakistan federal govts its a duty of federal govt to secure those containers .
Its my 2 cents but enough for your knowledge but going before to more details you or we have to accept the word of US state department of state that nothing like that happened & we have to take it cause its them who are on the lossing side .
 
ISLAMABAD: As Nato supply was blocked by the PTI and JI, it has not only troubled the US-led forces in Afghanistan but also left an adverse impact on the business of Pakistan Army-run NLC that is the leading agency involved in transportation of US/Nato/Isaf goods from Karachi Port to Afghanistan.

While toilet-related stuff tops in Nato consignments in terms of non-military shipments, transportation done through the NLC forms 64 percent of the total goods transited through Pakistan, official data from January 2011 to October 2013 available with The News reveals.

Other transporters who won contract for the Nato supply also have to secure approval from NLC that has assumed monopolistic role in the entire business. As the NLC does not have the capacity to deal with the load of work, it has largely outsourced the business to private goods forwarding agencies, a fact that was already established by a report on Isaf containers prepared in January 2011 by Dr Shoaib Suddle, the then Federal Tax Ombudsman.

The rate per 40-feet container ranges between Rs33,000 to Rs38,000, this report said. As many as 6,735 consignments of Isaf/Nato were transported to Afghanistan. How many containers were used for each consignment shipment could not be ascertained by The News.

Not only the Nato supply, NLC is the lead agency for the transportation of commercial/non-commercial cargo of Afghan Transit Trade, US military and Isaf. Out of 6,735 consignments of Isaf and Nato combined, the NLC transported 57 percent of them in the last three years followed by another transportation company, Clearance for Chartered Plan Carriers (17 percent), and Freight Solutions ranked third with contract of five percent goods transited through Pakistan during this period.

De-icing material carries the highest import value that Isaf and Nato shifted to Afghanistan via Pakistan. Toilet-related stuff was the second highest import for Isaf/Nato troops during this period. When supply was blocked after attack on Salala post claiming lives of Pakistani soldiers, it resulted in severe shortage of diapers.

Compared to combined supply of Isaf and Nato, NLC has more shares in transportation of Nato goods as 64 percent of the shipment is done through this agency. Another goods forwarding agency, M/s Security Transport, received contract of 32 percent consignments followed by M/s Razziq International with 23 percent shipment.

NLC uses private transport for Isaf/Nato transit cargo and only 30 percent owned and 70 percent privately hired vehicles for commercial category of transit cargo, the report had disclosed, according to Suddle report of

2011 on Isaf containers scam. In case of privately hired vehicles, NLC simply gets documents signed from the transporter without ensuring safety and security of the cargo, the report said. The US/Isaf/Nato cargo for transit to Afghanistan is allowed transportation, the report explained, through private sector on the recommendation of Foreign Office subject to NOC by NLC.

The Economic Coordination Committee in 2002 assigned the role of central coordination agency for arranging logistics for transportation of cargo pertaining to the humanitarian and rehabilitation program in Afghanistan to NLC, according to Suddle report. As NLC did not have the requisite number of trucks, it started authorizing private sector transporters to do the job instead.

NLC hit badly by blockade of Nato supplies - thenews.com.pk

NATO CONTAINERS AND NLC.....HIDDEN TRUTH | Tune.pk

Lo g you could have read my other posts before going through all this effort.

My point was simply based on the fact that MQM has always been interested in "Ports and Shipping Ministry" and I never said that whatever has been confiscated from nine zero is stolen from Nato containers. Other shipments could also have delivered the same goods..........................

Nlc is the Carier hired by the company who is at the receiving end or it can be a packege deal between sender & receiver ?
But not only NLC was the logestical carrier carrying these containers to Afghanistan ?
Private carriers were also involved in shipping those containers but the fact of the matter is the security of the containers & their routes ?
Due to the accord between USA Pakistan federal govts its a duty of federal govt to secure those containers .
Its my 2 cents but enough for your knowledge but going before to more details you or we have to accept the word of US state department of state that nothing like that happened & we have to take it cause its them who are on the lossing side .

Uncle that is fine but how does that negate my point that Babar Ghori was there to get shipments go unchecked and cleared from e.g South Africa?
 
Lo g you could have read my other posts before going through all this effort.

My point was simply based on the fact that MQM has always been interested in "Ports and Shipping Ministry" and I never said that whatever has been confiscated from nine zero is stolen from Nato containers. Other shipments could also have delivered the same goods..........................


What is the topic of this thread...??????
 
What is the topic of this thread...??????

Topic is US refuses claims that Nato lost its weapons.

But how my point is not relevant? Its all interconnected. And suppose if weapons were stolen from Nato containers do you expect any State to accept that, that easily when their weapons already landed in hands of ISIS, and world is criticizing them for that?
 
Last edited:
Topic is US refuses claims that Nato lost its weapons.

But how my point is not relevant? Its all interconnected. And suppose if weapons were stolen from Nato containers do you expect any State to accept that, that easily when there weapons already landed in hands of ISIS, and world is criticizing them for that?


And my point is if containers were missed then why could be put the responsibility at Babar Ghouri ... Transportation of containers was NLC's responsibility ............
 
And my point is if containers were missed then why could be put the responsibility at Babar Ghouri ... Transportation of containers was NLC's responsibility ............

What Babar Ghori has got to do with title of this thread? I dragged him in this discussion to support my point that MQM has been getting weapons cleared from ports, but those weapons need not be necessarily Nato's.

So what NLC has got to do with my accusation? And by the way charges in article quoted by you, rate for 40ft container are nowhere near reality. These days transportation cost is PKR 160,000 for 40ft and around PKR 135,000 for 20ft. (These rates are for KHI-ISB)
 
What Babar Ghori has got to do with title of this thread? I dragged him in this discussion to support my point that MQM has been getting weapons cleared from ports, but those weapons need not be necessarily Nato's.


Babar Ghouri is the main accuser of missing NATO containers ...........
 
If Altaf Hussain was a patriotic PAKISTANI then why did he offered to gather human intelligence against the Taliban to Britain, bypassing Pakistan's intelligence agencies??? And what the heck is the need of silencers???
 
What Babar Ghori has got to do with title of this thread? I dragged him in this discussion to support my point that MQM has been getting weapons cleared from ports, but those weapons need not be necessarily Nato's.

So what NLC has got to do with my accusation? And by the way charges in article quoted by you, rate for 40ft container are nowhere near reality. These days transportation cost is PKR 160,000 for 40ft and around PKR 135,000 for 20ft. (These rates are for KHI-ISB)
Now you are answering your question by yourself ?
That what is the connection between babar ghori & the so called missing NATO weapon containers ?
& for your information that no minster of ports & shipping can clear the shipment of any sort ?
Cause !
Customs , anti-narcotics these agencies not come under his domain.
He is not the only concerned person or the so called king who can just order anything on the sailing ships ?
So basicly your argument has no value how those weapons got into MQMs hands ?
But let me tell you something small shipping boats were used often in the costal areas of Baluchistan ?
Which is no where to 90 ?
So if you are a resourseful person , you can get a special bore licence & can purchase or sumgle the type of weapon you like ?
MQM can still get them if they want but I don't think its needed for them anymore cause it has harmed them political in the past & will harm them in the future .

If Altaf Hussain was a patriotic PAKISTANI then why did he offered to gather human intelligence against the Taliban to Britain, bypassing Pakistan's intelligence agencies??? And what the heck is the need of silencers???
So if any one offer any coopreation of any sort to any law enforcing allied agency against the declared universal terrorists he could not be patriotic Pakistani ?
Which country most of its citizens killed by talbans ?
Pakistan right ?

I think 'NO'
It was a ji prapoganda cum , advertisment which they carried out for their mullha masters who still are in bussines of drugs & weapons ?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom