Anyone who is cruel is bad. Anyone who is kind is good.
By your definition the jailers who keep convicted murderers locked in their cells are bad while their accomplices who seek to knock down prison walls to free them are good. Care to try again?
Anyone who believes in moral and just principles is good.
Like Robespierre? Or the Haqqanis?
I shouldn't haven't to talk in baby language!
That's where we all start.
Anyways I don't trust Hillary Clinton!
Trust her in what sense?
The French idealize Talleyrand, whose decades-long career practically began with regicide and included many betrayals, serving in succession the Church, the King, the Directory, Napoleon, the Allies, and again the King. When attacked in the English Parliament his character was defended by his interlocutor - sometimes enemy, sometimes ally, sometimes both - the Duke of Wellington,
thus:
Never had the character of a man been more unjustly attacked than that of Prince Talleyrand, whom he always found a loyal and honorable towards foreign Powers as he was steadfast and enlightened in regards to the interests of his own country.
In short, the Duke recognized that Talleyrand - unethical, sexually immoral, hypocritical, treasonous, and politely offensive - had always been most concerned about France, not necessarily the vacillations of its leadership. In that sense Talleyrand had been trustworthy.
(Upon reading the report of the Duke's speech, Talleyrand cried - possibly the only honest tears the man ever shed.)
Hillary is no Talleyrand but she represents America's leadership and I think I can trust that she is trying to serve America's interests. And since WWII it's usually been in America's interest not to defeat its enemies, but to grow them into new friends.
When that doesn't work, then one returns to the air force, navy, army, and marines.