What's new

US mulls options if Pakistan closes supply routes

fd24

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 23, 2011
5,864
0
10,168
Pentagon officials are examining alternate ways to move weapons and supplies into Afghanistan should Pakistani officials shut down logistical routes through their nation.

Since the U.S.-led mission began in late 2001, Pakistan has allowed U.S. military ground convoys to use its turf to move weapons, ammunition, food, water and other supplies into Afghanistan.


But with tensions at a boiling point, Senate Armed Services Committee leaders raised concerns Thursday about what would happen if that access were denied. The Hill

HIGHLIGHTS

America's reliability on Pakistan for supplying goods and arms and ammunition for its troops in Afghanistan has reduced to 35 percent, a top Pentagon official told U.S. lawmakers. The Economic Times

Now, lawmakers are pressing the military for details on "Plan B" if Pakistan were to shut off a key supply line for troops in Afghanistan. WSJ

In a hearing Thursday, Sens. Carl Levin (D., Mich.) and John McCain (R., Ariz.) quizzed Gen. William Fraser, the nominee to head U.S. Transportation Command, about what might happen if the logistics corridor that brings military supplies overland to Afghanistan from the port of Karachi, Pakistan, were shut down. WSJ

"We have made progress in the northern supply network," Fraser told the committee. Fraser said he wants to "expand operations there as an alternate mode for getting goods into the theater." The Hill

That may be easier said than done, however. Setting up the Northern Distribution Network -- an essential element to sustaining a "surge" of U.S. forces announced by President Barack Obama in December 2009 -- took months of work by U.S. diplomats to negotiate a series of transportation agreements with Russia and former Soviet republics. And Gen. Fraser said that if transportation routes through Pakistan were indeed shut down, the military would have to rely on cargo aircraft to airlift more goods into Afghanistan. WSJ

That option might work, McCain said, but he said aerial logistics missions are "four or five times more expensive" than moving supplies on the ground. The Hill

FACTS & FIGURES

In 2009, the United States moved 90 percent of its military surface cargo through the Pakistani port of Karachi and then through mountain passes into Afghanistan. Washington Post


Now almost 40 percent of surface cargo arrives in Afghanistan from the north, along a patchwork of Central Asian rail and road routes that the Pentagon calls the Northern Distribution Network. Washington Post

Pakistan has received $20.7 billion worth of U.S. assistance over the past decade, about two-thirds of it in military aid. Reuters

Pakistan has long been considered a vital ally by Washington in the fight against al-Qaeda and Taliban militants, who use safe havens in Pakistan's tribal regions on the Afghan border. BBC

The CIA has long used intelligence from Pakistan's intelligence agencies to help identify targets for drone strikes in the tribal areas bordering Afghanistan, but now, as officials on both sides say, it operates largely autonomously, especially since it has been concentrating its fire on the Haqqani militant network in the North Waziristan region. The Nation

The United States has given Islamabad a list of terrorist leaders it wants joint operations against, officials said. Pak Tribune
 
if paksitan is target then usa shud try to improve relations with iran for their routes or choose expensive path.
problems cant be solved through air droppings
 
if paksitan is target then usa shud try to improve relations with iran for their routes or choose expensive path.
problems cant be solved through air droppings

I think Zardari has been to Iran twice in the last few months to firm the relations with them. Iran are more anti American than anyone so i think they wouldn't entertain any approach from them.
Air droppings are expensive. Imagine containers being dropped with ammo and fuel. I think not.
America cant afford to take Pakistan and Iran on anymore.
 
The Americans can MULL their big @$$e$ off on figuring out where to bring in the beer for their troops in Afghanistan in case Pakistan decides to pull the plug on their supplies!! If it ain't coming through Pakistan, it would surely be coming through the American Taxpayer nose then! :cheers:
 
I think Zardari has been to Iran twice in the last few months to firm the relations with them. Iran are more anti American than anyone so i think they wouldn't entertain any approach from them.
Air droppings are expensive. Imagine containers being dropped with ammo and fuel. I think not.
America cant afford to take Pakistan and Iran on anymore.
Iran would have no beef with US once:

1. US removes the label of Axis of Evil from it.
2. Allow Iran to carry its peaceful Nuclear ambitions or so the Iran says. (This option can be forfeited if ties with US are mended and an alternate plan is put in place to sustain Iranian energy needs.)

Iranian leadership has repeatedly stated that it is ready to discuss all of its issues with US and reach a common ground, provided that US gives it respect it deserves and does not apply strict conditions on talks.

In addition, US have airdropped lots of its military supplies to sustain its Iraqi front. So do not underestimate its capabilities. And alternate routes are much more safe. No supply trucks get burned through those routes, which saves them the expenditure of replacing the destroyed goods.
 
i just went to karachi from hyderabad i saw more than 10 trucks supplying armored humvees equipped with 50cal. machine guns !!!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom