Contrary to your beliefs, every court has an obligation to give a chance to the defendent to present his case. In fact, how can you prosecute a guy who is not even in your custody?
Who knows, OBL may have hired an attorney to represent him.
I wonder why US refused the suggestion of trying OBL at some neutral country, just after 9/11 happened. US refused the suggestion since they were in mood of war, rather then going to court and present evidence.
Ok, lets suppose there were technical issues in going to court in the US, but in 10 years since 9/11, what kind of evidences has the US presented to the world to suggest that OBL was behind it.
If US can get evidence about the Iraqi WMDs, then why can't it simply present similar evidence to us, suggesting 9/11 was done by OBL.
Hell US not to this day probed the unusual stock trading done just before 9/11, especially since it involved unusual stock put options on the 2 airlines which were involved in the hijacking.
I do hope you have seen the movie Body of Lies, its very simple and easy to stage false flag operations, especially for the US, since they have so much technology in the world.
All, i am trying to say, even when he was alive and now dead, atleast show some evidence.
US after the May 2 raid gave the world 4 videos of OBL, even in those videos we can see lot of difference in the faces of the man being shown as OBL.

