What's new

US blames India for collapse of Trade Facilitation Agreement talks

VelocuR

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 4, 2009
6,188
5
7,223
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
US blames India for collapse of Trade Facilitation Agreement talks

17952959.cms


August 1 2014

WASHINGTON: The US has blamed India for the collapse of the talks for a Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) and said that New Delhi taking a hardline position has put the future of World Trade Organisation in "uncertain ground".

In a statement, the US has regretted that "India and handful of (WTO) Members" decided not to adhere to their commitment to implement the TFA consistent with the Bali agreement.

pixel.gif

India has been maintaining that it would not adopt the protocol on the TFA until a permanent solution is found on the public stock holding for food security purposes.

"The US is fully committed to the multilateral trading system embodied in the WTO. But the WTO system relies on its Members to implement the commitments to which they have agreed," US Trade Representative Mike Froman said in a statement, expressing his deep disappointment over the failure of the agreement on TFA.

"Geneva will be quiet for the next several weeks. This is a good time for all of us to reflect on these developments and to consider the implications going forward. We will consult with our trading partners on potential paths forward," Froman said.

Meanwhile, a trade official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said it is "incredibly sad" that India has not upheld its Bali commitment and this has put the WTO in a highly new "uncertain" ground.

The trade official, familiar with the Geneva negotiations on TFA, alleged that rigid stand of "India and very small handful of countries" has put the WTO in jeopardy.

India and the few other countries attempted to re-negotiate aspects of the Bali agreement, on which they had apparently changed their mind.

"In particular there was an effort to re-negotiate elements of the agreement on food security that had been arduously negotiated over a period of many many months," the official said.

It was difficult to understand the "erratic behaviour" by India, and for a long time there was no official position from the new Indian government, the official said adding that there was an indication that assurances needed to be made that all aspects agreed in Bali be given appropriate support by those who agreed to them.

India, the official said, received those assurances from G-20 members, including its current chairman Australia. There were other efforts to provide assurances to India in this regard.
"The US indicated that it is willing to find a formal way to give them the specific assurance regarding that particular question but the suggestion was rejected by India at the very last minute," the official said.

US blames India for collapse of Trade Facilitation Agreement talks - Economic Times

Blame game begins: US accuses India of putting WTO future in jeopardy

US will blame India more next five years, I think.
 
WASHINGTON: The US has blamed India for the collapse of the talks for a Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) and said that New Delhi taking a hardline position has put the future of World Trade Organisation in "uncertain ground".

The trade official, familiar with the Geneva negotiations on TFA, alleged that rigid stand of "India and very small handful of countries" has put the WTO in jeopardy.

India and the few other countries attempted to re-negotiate aspects of the Bali agreement, on which they had apparently changed their mind.

It was difficult to understand the "erratic behaviour" by India, and for a long time there was no official position from the new Indian government, the official said adding that there was an indication that assurances needed to be made that all aspects agreed in Bali be given appropriate support by those who agreed to them.

India, the official said, received those assurances from G-20 members, including its current chairman Australia. There were other efforts to provide assurances to India in this regard.
"The US indicated that it is willing to find a formal way to give them the specific assurance regarding that particular question but the suggestion was rejected by India at the very last minute," the official said.


In absolute layman terms:

It's like that scrawny, little kid huffing and puffing lifting 3 kilo weights in front of you at the gym, blocking your view to the mirror. You put up with it temporarily because you're sagacious and stoical, but it's irking you and trying your patience.
 
Last edited:
Tell US, we are not Pakistan who will be dictated by for US farmers' interests sacrificing our own food security.

USA is doing it to encourage its own business. ITs obvious we will care bout our own. Afterall USA doesnt comes when Indian farmer commits suicide due to huge losses. Our farmers are not yet ready to compete with developed world farmers, especially for the subsidy they get from US govt. USA can give huge subsidies but others cant. Poor USA, doesnt know this attitude doesnt work with Indians. It never did and never will. Afterall, India always refused to be on US payroll.
 
Yes, and limiting the value of food subsidies at 10 percent of the total food grain production considering 1986 as the base year is the way to go, genius WTO.

While US can get away with providing $120 billion as agricultural subsidies, India cannot exceed $15 billion, for it'll attract a hefty fine from WTO for violating it's regulations.

In absolute layman terms.

This is evidence of your lack of understanding of the issue, stay out of it, for your own good.

And I'm surprised this hasn't been posted yet: India stands vindicated; UN body supports Narendra Modi Govt’s WTO veto - News Oneindia

In a major boost for Narendra Modi-led NDA Government, a United Nations body too has supported India's tough stand at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) on the food security issue. The International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD) on Monday said that ensuring food for its people is more important than creating jobs in other nations.
 
Last edited:
Yes, and limiting the value of food subsidies at 10 percent of the total food grain production considering 1986 as the base year is the way to go, genius WTO.

While US can get away with providing $120 billion in subsidies to it's farmers, India cannot exceed $15 billion, for it'll attract a hefty fine from WTO for violating it's regulations.



This is evidence of your lack of understanding of the issue, stay out of it, for your own good.

And I'm surprised this hasn't been posted yet: India stands vindicated; UN body supports Narendra Modi Govt’s WTO veto - News Oneindia
And some laymen talking in laymen terms. :D

Bhai koi to hamare padosio ko education do. Its desperately needed in out region.
 
well excuse us for bothering about those 40% segment of our population who might have to starve if we would have signed this.
 
In absolute layman terms:

It's like that scrawny, little kid huffing and puffing lifting 3 kilo weights in front of you at the gym, blocking your view to the mirror. You put up with it temporarily because you're sagacious and stoical, but it's irking you and trying your patience.


WTO and economics are beyond your comprehension. Dont make a fool of yourself
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom