UN endorses Pakistan's position on UNSC Resolutions

[M. Sarmad]

“The position of the United Nations on this region is governed by the Charter...and applicable Security Council resolutions”,

https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/08/1044401

 

[Lincoln]

“The position of the United Nations on this region is governed by the Charter...and applicable Security Council resolutions”,

https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/08/1044401

Here's the full quote.

In a statement issued on 8 August, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he had been following the situation in Jammu and Kashmir “with concern”, making an appeal for “maximum restraint”.

“The position of the United Nations on this region is governed by the Charter...and applicable Security Council resolutions”, said the statement. “The Secretary-General also recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan also known as the Simla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means”, in accordance with the UN Charter.

Article dated 16th, statement on 8th. This is not the statement due to the meeting. So, basically UN said to solve it peacefully, but also bilaterally i.e. UN, others won't intervene.

So, which Pakistani position is endorsed here, enlighten me regarding this propaganda, please.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Here's the full quote.

In a statement issued on 8 August, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he had been following the situation in Jammu and Kashmir “with concern”, making an appeal for “maximum restraint”.

“The position of the United Nations on this region is governed by the Charter...and applicable Security Council resolutions”, said the statement. “The Secretary-General also recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan also known as the Simla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means”, in accordance with the UN Charter.

Article dated 16th, statement on 8th. This is not the statement due to the meeting.

The UN official position is that the UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir are applicable.

^^ what part do you fail to understand/comprehend?

Article dated 16th, statement on 8th. This is not the statement due to the meeting.

This article has been published on the UN website today, mentioning the Meeting and reiterating the position that the UNSC resolutions on Kashmir are applicable.

So, which Pakistani position is endorsed here, enlighten me

• Kashmir is not India's internal matter
• UNSC resolutions on Kashmir are relevant
• Simla does not supercede UN Resolutions.

======

And this is how Pakistani mainstream media is reporting this:

مسئلہ کشمیر کا حل اقوام متحدہ کی قراردادوں کے مطابق ہونا چاہیے، سلامتی کونسل کا اعلامیہ جاری
https://www.express.pk/story/1780154/10/

 

[Rank]

Here's the full quote.

In a statement issued on 8 August, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he had been following the situation in Jammu and Kashmir “with concern”, making an appeal for “maximum restraint”.

“The position of the United Nations on this region is governed by the Charter...and applicable Security Council resolutions”, said the statement. “The Secretary-General also recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan also known as the Simla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means”, in accordance with the UN Charter.

Article dated 16th, statement on 8th. This is not the statement due to the meeting. So, basically UN said to solve it peacefully, but also bilaterally i.e. UN, others won't intervene.

So, which Pakistani position is endorsed here, enlighten me regarding this propaganda, please.

You take any of the agreement but again you looser at the end because in all agreements Jammu and Kashmir declared disputed else for what Pak and India discuss???? if nothing is disputed??? simply J&K is not an integral part if it was... there was no need of meeting ... you guys literally living in fool paradise.

PS: United Nations agreement is overlapping and more valuable because it was recognaized by 194 countries in the world!

 

[M. Sarmad]

@Furious @Gandhi G in da house

@Dash

 

[Ahmet Pasha]

Problem is not UN or it's resolutions. But how powerful/ideologically driven countries are able to use UN to their advantage and simply ignore it when it is an impediment towards their goals.

US, Israel and India recently are clear examples.

Right now Kashmir is a 'problem' & none would like to touch it.

The only way to force P5 to address Kashmir issue is to raise issue to the level of 'crisis' that the entire world feel threatened.

The latest example is how Iran threatened to stop all the world's oil supply if US attacked Iran; thus raising the bar of threat so high that US had to conceded back in the last minutes; even after the fighter jets were on their way to attack Iran from air-craft carrier.

Exactly same is needed to be done in post-Article 370 era on Kashmir issue; raise it to the level of 'crisis'. Then the same P5 will be rushing in to stop Indian terrorism in Kashmir.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

The Shimla Agreement is applicable now. It came subsequently.