UK to exploit Libya's resources

[Aslan]

So according to you the anti-Qaddafi rebels are Western agents.

Selective reading and understanding are both not good. Please do point it out where and when did I say that. Dont try to act smart here.

 

[DANGER-ZONE]

Quadaffi himself was not a saint. He was looting the lybian resources. I hope that Next lybian govt should be non aligned (Neither in favor of West nor in favor of Hardliner Islamist). They use the money to feed the poor rather than feeding themselves.



First of all, the statement you are countering is stupid, secondly you also turn stupid... Two stupid argument can't be logical.. and please don bring kashmir/water here. recently we were blamed of releasing more water..

That will always be stupid for Indians ....

So according to you the anti-Qaddafi rebels are Western agents.

What ever the Qaddafi was and doesn't matter how mean and evil was he.. But what was the purpose of attacking Libya by NATO and US forces. It was Libya's inner matter ! would you like see NATO attacking your country to support anti GOVT movements.

Qaddafi wasn't an angel for sure but this war was another OIL WAR and now you have seen the result. Libya is not even restored but wells are about to GET WELL.

 

[Aslan]

That will always be stupid for Indians ....



What ever the Qaddafi was and doesn't matter how mean and evil was he.. But what was the purpose of attacking Libya by NATO and US forces. It was Libya's inner matter ! would you like see NATO attacking your country to support anti GOVT movements.

Qaddafi wasn't an angel for sure but this war was another OIL WAR and now you have seen the result. Libya is not even restored but wells are about to GET WELL.

Just like they did in Iraq, bombed the whole country to stone age but made sure that the oil refineries and wells were not tempered with.

 

[jdme]

I concur with others. Attacking Libya was a mistake. Darfur was a good example. Let them kill each other.

 

[Whazzup]

Then why to restrict water to Pakistan that comes from Kashmir and flow naturally through the country?? it does not belongs to India just because it comes out from occupied Kashmir. it Belongs to Almighty and the world, isn't it. ?
now how will you justify your pathetic comment.
Shell we attack your country and take control of your energy sources just because it belongs to THE WORLD.

^^^^^Can't blame you This happens when dumb meets dumber

Anyways what the matter with Superkaif he never gives his sources for his thread

 

[ashokdeiva]

I don't think UK alone is going to exploit Libiya's Oil. The entire NATO countries are going to do the same.
I don't know why the people of Libiya are falling for the NATO bones like dogs

 

[Whazzup]

This is what this whole sharade was all about. Why did the west suddently wake up to oh Qaddafi is so evil. Were they on drugs a mere month ago when they were wining and dinning Qaddafi. Or was it that as one South Afircan X security agent had mentioned on BBC today taht it was all because Qaddafi had just recently decided to move away from the west and get more and more involved with China and Russia. And an example of this barbaric hunger is displayed by an indian just a couple of post above mine.

Well don't know why west woke up sooo late or they just wanted the oil but yeah that guy really deserved that .
Moving towards China and russia??? dude Libiya is not such a influencial country that NATO will attack it just because they are goin towards east

Though I think NATO was actually waiting for a rebel to happen against Qaddafi . which happened after so many years.

 

[ashokdeiva]

I concur with others. Attacking Libya was a mistake. Darfur was a good example. Let them kill each other.

Do you think there is any profit for the NATO to stop Darfur? the answer is a NO. as far as Libiya is concerned, its the interest of the NATO to interven to secure the oil. The entire world knows that NATO instigated the rebelion to get hold of the OIL resources in the new Transistional Government

---------- Post added at 05:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:09 PM ----------

Though I think NATO was actually waiting for a rebel to happen against Qaddafi . which happened after so many years.

They never waited, they instigated the rebelion.

 

[Aslan]

^^^^^Can't blame you This happens when dumb meets dumber

Anyways what the matter with Superkaif he never gives his sources for his thread

You are calling him dumb but blindly missed the stupidity that he was responding to.

 

[jdme]

Do you think there is any profit for the NATO to stop Darfur? the answer is a NO. as far as Libiya is concerned, its the interest of the NATO to interven to secure the oil. The entire world knows that NATO instigated the rebelion to get hold of the OIL resources in the new Transistional Government

I am not agreeing with NATO's motives. I am just giving consideration to the idea of letting countries sort their matter out. It seems to working fine for Syria, for example.

 

[Whazzup]

You are calling him dumb but blindly missed the stupidity that he was responding to.

If you do me a favour of reading my post again then you'll find out that I hadn't missed anyone of them , its like ek teer se do shikar.

 

[Aslan]

Well don't know why west woke up sooo late or they just wanted the oil but yeah that guy really deserved that .
Moving towards China and russia??? dude Libiya is not such a influencial country that NATO will attack it just because they are goin towards east

Though I think NATO was actually waiting for a rebel to happen against Qaddafi . which happened after so many years.

I mentioned it as a quote mentioned by a South African on the radio program this morning. And Its not about how influential Libya is or was it is all about what they are sitting on and how much cheap resources they can provide the ailing European economies with.

And also just a bit before the Iraq was the Iraqis had started to deal directly in Euro rather then Dollars for their oil exports.

 

[ashokdeiva]

I am not agreeing with NATO's motives. I am just giving consideration to the idea of letting countries sort their matter out. It seems to working fine for Syria, for example.

Syria, is where the NATO should have been involved, but they did not. I think the following are the two reasons for NATO's being passive.
1) Syria has the backing of IRAN, if a war errupts US will plunge into the ailing debt crisis that is already showing signs of Economic depression world over.
2) Syria has a decline in OIL production Syria - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Hussein]

Britain's government has decided to take control of Libyan oil facilities as British Petroleum announced plans to resume operations in oil-rich North African country.

As Libyan opposition fighters take control of more and more areas in the capital Tripoli, the world's superpowers are trying to gain hegemony over the African country by securing lucrative contracts under the pretext of rebuilding Libya so that the country's economy would become dependent upon hegemonic powers.

Before the beginning of revolution in Libya in February, the oil-rich country produced around 1.6 million barrels per day. Libya was the seventeenth-largest oil producer in the world and the third largest in Africa.

After six months of war, however, the country's oil output has been reduced to just 100,000 barrels per day.

As experts predict that the North African country's oil output could reach 1 million barrels per day within a few months, British Petroleum, has announced plans to return to Libya as “soon as conditions allow.”

Meanwhile, a spokesman for UK Trade & Investment which is a part of Department of Business, announced that the British government plans to secure a major share in Libya's market seeking to win profitable contracts.

“We are in regular contact with companies and organizations who have business interests in Libya and have been throughout the conflict. As soon as the situation on the ground allows, UKTI has plans to provide in-country support and advice to companies wishing to be part of the reconstruction effort,” he said.

Moreover, Director Government Support at Control Risks Chris Sanderson, an international risk consultancy and security management company, said that there is an unprecedented “opportunity for UK business to seek to recover commercially some measure of the UK's significant diplomatic and military investment.”

He explained that there are opportunities for the British businesses on three grounds. First, Libya's need to rebuild infrastructure provides British companies with numerous profitable contracts. Second, British business can operate in fields like “health, education and civil security.” Finally, British companies can exploit Libya's oil and gas sectors as well as “commercial support services such as banking, finance and telecommunications.”

And i thought Britain was sending all the weapons and SAS for humanitarian reasons! Never would i thought it was for OIL! I love it when they steal in the name of freedom!

source: IranTV the international Iranian regime channel
lol
by the way the oil from Libya is a very small part of the oil used in Europe or even England and France
the rank is only 15th in the world for oil export !!!

and Nigeria would be much easier to invade and get much more oil there
not speaking about KSA

 

[harpoon]

Selective reading and understanding are both not good. Please do point it out where and when did I say that. Dont try to act smart here.

A simple Yes or No would do. No need to play 'smarty pants'.

@Topic:There is no doubt that the rebellion against Qaddafi had popular support and NATO helped them with air cover and advisers for rebels. NATO has done no charity to Libyan rebels and they will surely try recoup the cost associated with NATO intervention and also make sure that they and their companies will have dominance in that country. Thats what world powers do and the rest of the world has to deal with it.