UK severs ties with Iranian banks

[888jamie888]

Ahmadinejad was misquoted by bad media he never said to wipe out Israel he said Israel will be forgotten from the pages of history.

Either way that can't mean anything good for Israel.

 

[longbrained]

At any rate Britain is going down with its faltering economy and a massive debt out of control. Check this now from British newspaper SUN reporting today that British business chiefs have urged to tap into Iranian market and increase exports in order to save British economy, their businesses are saying we are failing for God's sake let us export to Iran and British government in an incarnation of fascism is saying close down the factories and lay off the people but Iranians have to produce it themselves not buying from British businesses:


BUSINESS chiefs were red-faced last night after urging British firms to save the economy by exporting to IRAN.
The CBI listed the pariah state as one of 11 countries companies should focus on to "get ahead of the curve".

The report — put together with accountants Ernst and Young — comes hours after the US talked of slapping tough, new sanctions on Iran over fears it is seeking nuclear weapons.

CBI chiefs last night said they had simply been trying to highlight "high growth" economies around the world. Others alongside Iran include Egypt, Indonesia, Turkey and Vietnam.

A spokesman said: "The report does not seek to examine the geopolitical backdrop."

But the gaffe is a setback ahead of the launch of the CBI Annual Conference today.

The CBI report Winning Overseas urges firms to broaden their horizons beyond Europe to boost the recovery and build on skills in construction, nanotechnology and telecoms.

It claims companies could generate an extra £20billion for the economy by simply matching the rate of German exports over the next decade.

Currently just four per cent of the UK's exports go to so-called BRIC countries — Brazil, Russia, India and China. This compares with 11 per cent of German and US exports.

Steve Varley, of Ernst and Young, said: "A few hundred years ago we were the best in the world at trade.

"We were fantastic, we jumped in ships and off we went. We have lost our way and I think the Germans have surpassed us in trade to India now. Now is the time for the UK to seize the opportunity."
Biz chiefs want Iran export | The Sun |News

 

[IranZamin]

Actually Iran made a mistake after the revolution when they closed down only American and Israeli embassies. They should have closed down British embassy as well. Britain gave birth to both these nations and it was the mother lode but some how Iranians forgot about it. Anyways it is never too late. Britain is very cunning and any kind of relations with it is going to be tricky.

There is a debate ongoing in the Iranian parliament about severing ties with the UK. If the decision is fully supported by the parliament it will go to the supreme leader, and be sure that the supreme leader then decides to cut of relations with these snakes

 

[888jamie888]

There is a debate ongoing in the Iranian parliament about severing ties with the UK. If the decision is fully supported by the parliament it will go to the supreme leader, and be sure that the supreme leader then decides to cut of relations with these snakes

Cheers bro. Nice to see you're not generalizing.

 

[JayAtl]

There is a debate ongoing in the Iranian parliament about severing ties with the UK. If the decision is fully supported by the parliament it will go to the supreme leader, and be sure that the supreme leader then decides to cut of relations with these snakes

supreme leader is the crackpot the world and Iran's neighbours worry about. whether they sa it openly or not. I think nothing will be better for the " civilized" world if Iran removes another source of its income...i.e. UK.

---------- Post added at 12:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------

Cheers bro. Nice to see you're not generalizing.

did you even read his quote.. he just generalized and called your country ( per your flag) as snakes...

 

[IranZamin]

supreme leader is the crackpot the world and Iran's neighbours worry about. whether they sa it openly or not. I think nothing will be better for the " civilized" world if Iran removes another source of its income...i.e. UK.

ahhhh, the american puppet speaks again.

 

[fd24]

Their President is quite mad as I'm sure you know. He has called for Israel to be wiped out, genocide.
Nukes in the hands of a genocidal madman? No thanks.

Ok Jamie I appreciate the response. Lets look at the leaders of the USA and UK. In the Iraq war - many would say that Bush and Blair by lying about WMD should be put on trial for mass murder. By falsifying statements they pushed through motions and simply lied about the reason why Iraq should be invaded. Thousands of innocent people died - yet no WMD. They lied to the world and caused a nation to suffer so badly. Israel have done far worse and they havent had their nukes questioned. In your eyes he may be mad - but their again what else would one expect from reading the western press all the time.

 

[Emmie]

and how did you conclusively ascertain that he was a Bharati?Plus,learn how to spell "Bharati" cuz you might think misspelling it makes you look like a cool bigot but most of us in here are thinking "The moron never passed secondary school"

First off I really don't care about the word "bharti or bharati" because I merely use it, word "Indian" works for me perfectly. Secondly I have no clue whatsoever why that spelling rendered someone to overreact to that extend especially when the word was not typed in Arabic or Devanagari script!! You know what, kinda strange and unnecessary attitude (like yours) actually vindicates a bigot, one who misspells is defamed mindlessly, poor guy.. It would be good for you to note a fact that there are individuals in the world who despite of having passed their secondary schools and colleges still are morons, for you Zaid Hamid would be a perfect example..lollll.. BTW when did you pass your secondary school?

Yes that fella was bharti, sorry bharati rather, and that is for sure.... If you say I can provide you a captured screen that shows his perfect roman Hindi? Why don't you have a look and analyse it for yourself?

 

[JayAtl]

ahhhh, the american puppet speaks again.

I'm a puppet? and you call your " mortal" leader- the supreme leader..

 

[JayAtl]

Ok Jamie I appreciate the response. Lets look at the leaders of the USA and UK. In the Iraq war - many would say that Bush and Blair by lying about WMD should be put on trial for mass murder. By falsifying statements they pushed through motions and simply lied about the reason why Iraq should be invaded. Thousands of innocent people died - yet no WMD. They lied to the world and caused a nation to suffer so badly. Israel have done far worse and they havent had their nukes questioned. In your eyes he may be mad - but their again what else would one expect from reading the western press all the time.

ahh the classic case of equating conventional wars with possessing nukes by fanatical religion driven made men. Notice they never speak of the ills of the 7 year old war between Iran and Iraq. Iran is free to build as many conventional weapons as it wants... free to use nuclear technology for civilian purposes.

But having a nuclear bomb? I think not.... some people need to know the magnitude of destruction that a nuclear weapons disposes and the risks of having it in the hands of the lunatics ...PLUS Iran’s support of terrorist organizations AND that it has a record of proliferation! Ironically Iran claims NOT to want a nuclear weapon...but we all know what it does surreptitiously.

If one applies your analogy of a " conventional war" i.e. Bush and Iraq as a right to have nuclear weapons-- then afghanistan needs to also posses one to attack pakistan. would that be fine too?

 

[cyphercide]

First off I really don't care about the word "bharti or bharati" because I merely use it, word "Indian" works for me perfectly. Secondly I have no clue whatsoever why that spelling rendered someone to overreact to that extend especially when the word was not typed in Arabic or Devanagari script!! You know what, kinda strange and unnecessary attitude (like yours) actually vindicates a bigot, one who misspells is defamed mindlessly, poor guy.. It would be good for you to note a fact that there are individuals in the world who despite of having passed their secondary schools and colleges still are morons, for you Zaid Hamid would be a perfect example..lollll.. BTW when did you pass your secondary school?

Yes that fella was bharti, sorry bharati rather, and that is for sure.... If you say I can provide you a captured screen that shows his perfect roman Hindi? Why don't you have a look and analyse it for yourself?

Roman Hindi? Extend instead of the use of "extent"? Sure,you sound like a well educated man.....lolz!!!


Perhaps I'm being snotty,yet I disapprove of personal attacks until they are worthy of it.Kindly forgive me of my attitude and let's concentrate on the subject at hand brother!!!

 

[longbrained]

I'm a puppet? and you call your " mortal" leader- the supreme leader..

Actually the term supreme leader is an invention of western propaganda media. There is no such title in Iran. So first educate yourself before writing. The correct title is "leader of revolution". And yeah puppet can be a strong word and shock the hell out of a poor puppet when it realizes it is not actually in control of its life anymore:

 

[fd24]

I do agree that the west can't self appoint itself as the sole arbitrator but what else do we have a shot on preserving the Middle East eh?Deescalation of matters is what is required if we are being honest on the capabilities on Iran to strike the United States(heck,even we can't hit Washington let alone Iran!!!).Iran's use of nuclear weapons(if they choose to) is going to render the entire Middle East in peril.Now tell me why should the rest like Saudi Arabia suffer for the doings of Tehran?

With respect you are missing my point. Does the west have a right to distinguish who can or cant have nukes? Has Iran got a right to protect itself? It is a well known fact the USA and UK entered and destroyed and stole from Iraq by telling lies. Should Iran not day and night work on not being the next in line to get "mugged " by these nations?
You are predicting scenarios that perhaps ae evident with half a dozen other nations about who would be at risk with the capabilities. Why cant we assume they are going to be used as deterrants? When you say why should the likes od Saudi suffer? - Irans primary concern should be to protect its own citizens foremost. Iran in my opinion are not a rogue nation. They want to protect themselves - that doesnt make them a rogue nation.

 

[cyphercide]

With respect you are missing my point. Does the west have a right to distinguish who can or cant have nukes? Has Iran got a right to protect itself? It is a well known fact the USA and UK entered and destroyed and stole from Iraq by telling lies. Should Iran not day and night work on not being the next in line to get "mugged " by these nations?
You are predicting scenarios that perhaps as evident with half a dozen other nations about who would be at risk with the capabilities. Why cant we assume they are going to be used as deterrents? When you say why should the likes od Saudi suffer? - Irans primary concern should be to protect its own citizens foremost. Iran in my opinion are not a rogue nation. They want to protect themselves - that doesnt make them a rogue nation.

Unfortunately brother,this is the ugly truth.Iran can't retaliate against the United States(western powers) with or without nuclear weapons...(I do agree to your last post which raises the question on arbitration on nuclear weapons....but kindly listen to me when I ask "What else does the Middle East have to protect itself?").I don't want divisions in the Middle East on account of Iran's nuclear warheads,Is that so hard to comprehend?

 

[longbrained]

Unfortunately brother,this is the ugly truth.Iran can't retaliate against the United States(western powers) with or without nuclear weapons...(I do agree to your last post which raises the question on arbitration on nuclear weapons....but kindly listen to me when I ask "What else does the Middle East have to protect itself?").I don't want divisions in the Middle East on account of Iran's nuclear warheads,Is that so hard to comprehend?

Iran has every right to defend itself even if it be at the cost of dividing middle east between American puppets and independent nations. If nuclear war heads do it for Iran then they should go ahead for it. What you do not comprehend is this: You are sounding like a hypocrite sitting on top of nuclear weapons and lecturing others. Maybe you should give up nukes first and bring down the war tension in south Asia and since it was India that started the tests you would be well advised to sign NPT and give up your weapons at once.