What's new

U.S. will deploy 1,500 troops to Middle East

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 8, 2018
4,643
-1
4,053
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
U.S. deploys 1,500 troops to Middle East, blames Iran for tanker attacks

Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali, Roberta Rampton

MAY 24, 2019

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States announced on Friday the deployment of 1,500 troops to the Middle East, describing it as an effort to bolster defenses against Iran as it accused the country’s Revolutionary Guards of direct responsibility for this month’s tanker attacks.

U.S. President Donald Trump publicly announced the 1,500 figure, which had been previously reported by Reuters, and described it as a defensive measure. The troops include personnel manning missile defense systems, aerial surveillance to spot threats and engineers to fortify defenses.

“We want to have protection in the Middle East. We’re going to be sending a relatively small number of troops, mostly protective,” Trump said as he left the White House for a trip to Japan.

The deployment marks a reversal of sorts for Trump, who only on Thursday said he thought more troops were unnecessary. Trump has sought to detangle the U.S. military from open-ended conflicts in places like Syria and Afghanistan.

The deployment is relatively small, compared with the about 70,000 American troops now stationed across a region that stretches from Egypt to Afghanistan. In addition, some 600 of the 1,500 “new” troops are already in the Middle East manning Patriot missiles, and will see their deployments extended.

Eager to avoid escalation with Iran amid already heightened tensions, Pentagon officials stressed the defensive nature of the deployment in a news briefing and noted that none of the troops would be heading to hot spots like Iraq or Syria.

“These are defensive forces,” said Katie Wheelbarger, one of the Pentagon’s most senior policy officials.

The Trump administration this month ordered the deployment of an aircraft carrier strike group, bombers and additional Patriot missiles to the Middle East, citing intelligence about possible Iranian preparations to attack U.S. forces or interests.

ATTACKS ON TANKERS
Rear Admiral Michael Gilday, the director of the Joint Staff, on Friday described U.S. intelligence portraying a new Iranian “campaign” that used old tactics, and stretched from Iraq to Yemen to the waters in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime chokepoint for the global oil trade.

Gilday accused Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) of being directly responsible for attacks on tankers off the United Arab Emirates earlier this month — in what could be a foreshadowing of the conclusion of ongoing investigations into the incident.

“The attack against the shipping in Fujairah, we attribute it to the IRGC,” Gilday said, explaining that the Pentagon attributed limpet mines used in the attack directly to the IRGC.

He declined to describe “the means of delivery” of the mines, however.

Gilday also accused Iran-backed “proxy” forces of carrying out a rocket attack in Baghdad’s Green Zone last week.

The Pentagon did not provide any evidence to support its claims, but said it hoped to further declassify intelligence supporting them. Iran has dismissed the accusations entirely and accuses the United States of brinkmanship with its troop deployments.

Trump played down the potential for military conflict in the region, saying he believed Iran did not want a confrontation with the United States — even as Washington tightens sanctions with a goal of pushing Iran to make concessions beyond the terms of its 2015 nuclear deal.

Trump pulled out of the international deal between Iran and six major world powers last year.

“Right now, I don’t think Iran wants to fight. And I certainly don’t think they want to fight with us,” Trump said.

“But they cannot have nuclear weapons,” he continued. “They can’t have nuclear weapons. And they understand that.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...send-1500-troops-to-middle-east-idUSKCN1SU1VQ
 
What is 1,500 troops going to do ?
Not much. I was thinking it would be at least 10,000. Hmm...but maybe thats because the US has a good # of soldiers around Iran, but who knows. I wonder if US marines/SF will start doing some infiltration ops from Iran's coasts...
 
Not much. I was thinking it would be at least 10,000. Hmm...but maybe thats because the US has a good # of soldiers around Iran, but who knows. I wonder if US marines/SF will start doing some infiltration ops from Iran's coasts...

You are right SF and Marines will start doing the work.
 
That's what it takes to topple the Mullah regime of Iran, also bear in mind that the US currently has 70,000 soldiers in the Middle East.



US will topple the Iranian regime using 70,000 soldiers? :lol::rofl:

Lay off the camel urine and watch this instead:


70,000 soldiers would get splattered like flies.
 
US will topple the Iranian regime using 70,000 soldiers? :lol::rofl:

Lay off the camel urine and watch this instead:


70,000 soldiers would get splattered like flies.
90,000 troops were committed to invade Iraq in 2003, and about half of this strength was assigned the responsibility of combat operations, and this force took over Iraq in just 21 days. Even though Iraq was militarily weak at this point in time, Saddam regime had amassed an asymmetric force of its own (e.g. Fidayeen), and was still much stronger than the Hezbollah in Lebanon.

A renowned Iraqi military general Ra'ad Majid Rashid al-Hamdani had low opinion about IDF but praised American military prowess:

General Hamdani on a number of occasions commented on how much the American military had impressed him in both 1990 and 2003. Particularly interesting was his view that the US Army was far superior to any he had seen in the Middle East— including the Israeli Defense Force. What particularly impressed him in 1990 was the sight of US soldiers along the Saudi-Kuwaiti border in full body armor and Kevlar helmets during the early period of Operation DESERT SHIELD, despite the fact that the temperature was 100+ degrees, and that hostilities had yet to begin. He claimed that he had noted to one of his subordinates at the time that the American appearance alone underlined "a real sense of discipline."

Link: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a482565.pdf

Take the opinion of that Israeli 'expert' with a grain of salt. US is an entirely different beast in comparison to Israel in the matters of warfare.

B/W YOU have an extremely inflated view of the Iranian military might. When the show begins, be prepared to answer lot of questions but I have a feeling that you will stop posting here because 'propaganda bots' usually loose steam in the face of ground realities.
 
I value his opinion much more highly than your brain farts. You're some fanboy on a forum, who are you compared to him?
I base my arguments on 'documented evidences at hand' but your remarks are pure brain farts - Iranian propaganda bot.
 
I base my arguments on 'meaningful information' but your remarks are pure brain farts - Iranian propaganda bot.

Your "meaning-full information" is worth less than my faeces. I have posted a video of an Israeli expert you baboon. I bet he is also an Iranians propagandist :lol:

His analysis is infinitely more valuable than your brainfarts. You're a nobody.
 
That's what it takes to topple the Mullah regime of Iran, also bear in mind that the US currently has 70,000 soldiers in the Middle East.
US will topple the Iranian regime using 70,000 soldiers? :lol::rofl:

Lay off the camel urine and watch this instead:

So, Persian Empire will fight with new Arab Empire...

One Race is fight with another Race..

How will you match the eyes with Nabi Kareem (SAWW) on the day of Judgement:(.
 
Your "meaning-full information" is worth less than my faeces. I have posted a video of an Israeli expert you baboon. I bet he is also an Iranians propagandist :lol:

His analysis is infinitely more valuable than your brainfarts. You're a nobody.
And I provided information which suggest otherwise as in US >>> Israel in the matters of warfare. General Hamdani, whose views I cited, is a veteran of all modern-era Iraqi conflicts, and he knew much better than this Israeli expert.

But of-course, you being an Iranian muppet with IQ of 10 wouldn't understand. And I m definitely 'somebody' in my choice of profession. Do not mistake every poster for being a failure such as yourself in real life.
 
And I provided information which suggest otherwise as in US >>> Israel in the matters of warfare. General Hamdani, whose views I cited, is a veteran of all modern-era Iraqi conflicts, and he knew much better than this Israeli expert.

Your information was BS. The Iraqi army surrendered like pathetic cowards (like they did with ISIS not long ago). Had they actually properly fought, things would have been different. So don't waste my time with BS.

Once again, I take the world of an actual expert, one who is actually Iran's enemy over your statements.
 
Last edited:
No bro, many of our brothers are Arabs. Why would we fight them?

If they are you brothers than what is this..
Lay off the camel urine and watch this instead:

Al-Nu’man ibn Bashir reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The parable of the believers in their affection, mercy, and compassion for each other is that of a body. When any limb aches, the whole body reacts with sleeplessness and fever.”

Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 5665, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2586
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom