RescueRanger
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Islamists and muslims are clearly different. There are maoist, christian terrorists too.
WordNet Search - 3.1
Why do you feel the need to "teach" me about a word I am all to familiar with.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Islamists and muslims are clearly different. There are maoist, christian terrorists too.
WordNet Search - 3.1
Cowards.
Both are wrong but you can ignore satire, can you do the same with murderers.Stop being a fool. Both are wrong. Offending people belonging to any faith or culture is wrong. Killing people is wrong. Anyone justifying either is wrong too.
Why do you feel the need to "teach" me about a word I am all to familiar with.
Is that supposed to mean something?
Both are wrong but you can ignore satire, can you do the same with murderers.
Coward for not standing up to the universal truth I, e humanity.Cowards for not adding more fuel to a raging fire? What do you seek? More bloodshed and conflict?
If you were familiar with the word, why replace it with terrorist, an extremely broad term?
Islamists wanted the cartoons to be out of circulation, so they won.
Cowards or exercising their own "freedom of speech and expression"?Coward for not standing up to the universal truth I, e humanity.
Even if someone is incited there is always legal system, how would you feel if today someone who is incited by American presence in Pakistan blows himself. Bad but also is it justified? Can I justify that too.Having reading difficulties?
Why offend people in the first place? Of course violence is wrong, but so is inciting hate.
If you were familiar with the word, why replace it with terrorist, an extremely broad term?
Islamists wanted the cartoons to be out of circulation, so they won.
It's O.K. to make satire against other religions but please don't make satire against " HOLOCAUSTS " we are special and totally insecure.
Is that supposed to mean something?
Both are wrong but you can ignore satire, can you do the same with murderers.
Because Islam is a belief system, it has nothing to do with terrorists. To define Terrorism: the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. - That covers what happened perfectly well, "Islamism/Islamists" vilifies Muslims and the people who suffer are not the mullahs, the militants, but the ordinary Muslim who only wants to have the same things YOU and I want. A normal life!
Well no ultra liberal is bombing them for not showing the picture, I just said what came in my mind, that's my opinion, as Edmund Burke said that only thing necessary for triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Here its happening.Because Islam is a belief system, it has nothing to do with terrorists. To define Terrorism: the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. - That covers what happened perfectly well, "Islamism/Islamists" vilifies Muslims and the people who suffer are not the mullahs, the militants, but the ordinary Muslim who only wants to have the same things YOU and I want. A normal life!
Cowards or exercising their own "freedom of speech and expression"?
No they didn't win. The killers lost. The media houses which didn't show the disrespectful images slapped them in the face. The murderers wanted hostility between people. They are not getting it from these media groups.
Even if someone is incited there is always legal system, how would you feel if today someone who is incited by American presence in Pakistan blows himself. Bad but also is it justified? Can I justify that too.
Really? As RescueRanger rightly noted, the terrorists' objective was achieved as the images were not republished, and any cartoonist would think twice before picking on the religion of some insecure people with assault rifles.