Surely, it is not upto a sarcastic Pakistani to ponder about. Like I said, move on.
You do realise Pakistan can talk with experience on this matter, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Surely, it is not upto a sarcastic Pakistani to ponder about. Like I said, move on.
When did I claim any of that? And Happy New Year to you too.'Relevant'...I like your choice of words.
Look, you're more than welcome keep strong ties with whomever you want. We got not issues with that. Just get your shit together with the CAA & the NRC or whatever the hell is going on, on your side. Putting the blame on Pakistan by stating that the ISI is behind 2 Million Muslims revolting is a joke.
Its a new year. Please don't continue the trend of being the joke 2nd year running.
India did capture important parts of Pakistan Baltistan and many peaks north of Kargil, which Pakistan unsuccessfully tries to take back in 1999. Taking Bangladesh was out of the question though. There simply was no good way to integrate a country that big into India.Quite wrong. It’s the stupid which suffer in American partnership. Counter-examples are South Korea and Japan.
US has many allies around the globe, most of them doing great. Pakistan suffered due to its own failures. Had it not been US pressure, India would have certainly captured your territories in ‘71 war.
This isn't good news for Pakistan. An upgrading of India's status with regards to arms sales to India (to the level as Israel and South Korea) will have serious repercussions for Pakistan, more especially on the LoC. In fact it would be most hard hitting on Pakistan on the LoC and will give India a huge advantage in its aim to enter Azad Kashmir. Where are the Pakistani lobbyists in Washington DC? Have they been fast asleep??
And it was supposed to protect whose interest?
India did capture important parts of Pakistan Baltistan and many peaks north of Kargil, which Pakistan unsuccessfully tries to take back in 1999. Taking Bangladesh was out of the question though. There simply was no good way to integrate a country that big into India.
in which part of Gilgit baltistan you're talking about and which strategic peaks in Kargil you took. are you're on high, please gives us the proofs with sources/linksIndia did capture important parts of Pakistan Baltistan and many peaks north of Kargil, which Pakistan unsuccessfully tries to take back in 1999. Taking Bangladesh was out of the question though. There simply was no good way to integrate a country that big into India.
Already a thread about that on PDFIf they are American citizen eating American and earning here, they should be working for American interests not Bharti junk.
Which brand of cow CA cola you are high on?
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/sudd...of-captured-kashmiri-villages-of-1971.296921/in which part of Gilgit baltistan you're talking about and which strategic peaks in Kargil you took. are you're on high, please gives us the proofs with sources/links
LOL, Look the source, its Indian and your're talking abut 71 we are living in 21 century and thing can be changed, we have total control of Gilgit Baltistan and AZAD KASHMIR, you living in your fantasy world fairy Tales
So you are denying Turtuk and surrounding peaks were once a part of Pakistan? Eventhe northern part of Kargil district was administered by Pakistan prior to 1971.LOL, Look the source, its Indian and your're talking abut 71 we are living in 21 century and thing can be changed, we have total control of Gilgit Baltistan and AZAD KASHMIR, you living in your fantasy world fairy Tales
This isn't good news for Pakistan. An upgrading of India's status with regards to arms sales to India (to the level as Israel and South Korea) will have serious repercussions for Pakistan, more especially on the LoC. In fact it would be most hard hitting on Pakistan on the LoC and will give India a huge advantage in its aim to enter Azad Kashmir. Where are the Pakistani lobbyists in Washington DC? Have they been fast asleep??
Don't troll, there were no control of Pakistan before 71 for such a high and useless terrain, so you illegally occupied it, its a international dispute according to UN, and we took your part Kashmir In 48 and you did nothing but crying out loud in front of the world ( UN) why you will try and take it backSo you are denying Turtuk and surrounding peaks were once a part of Pakistan? Eventhe northern part of Kargil district was administered by Pakistan prior to 1971.
And we have the actual Kashmir.

