What's new

U.S. aircraft carrier heads for Korean waters

S.U.R.B.

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Jan 31, 2010
2,741
10
6,762
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
U.S. aircraft carrier heads for Korean waters

INCHEON, South Korea (Reuters) – A U.S. aircraft carrier group set off for Korean waters on Wednesday, a day after North Korea rained artillery shells on a South Korean island, in a move likely to enrage Pyongyang and unsettle its ally, China.

South Korea said the bodies of two civilians were found on

the island after Tuesday's attack, which is likely to stir up

more resentment in the country against its prickly neighbor.

The nuclear-powered USS George Washington, which carries 75 warplanes and has a crew of over 6,000, left a naval base south of Tokyo and would join exercises with South Korea from Sunday to the following Wednesday, U.S. officials in Seoul said.

"This exercise is defensive in nature," U.S. Forces Korea said in a statement. "While planned well before yesterday's unprovoked artillery attack, it demonstrates the strength of the ROK (South Korea)-U.S. alliance and our commitment to regional stability through deterrence."

North Korea said the South was driving the peninsula to the "brink of war" with "reckless military provocation" and by postponing humanitarian aid, the North's official KCNA news agency said. The dispatch did not refer to the planned military drills.

The government in Seoul came under pressure for the military's slow response to the provocation, echoing similar complaints made when a warship was sunk in March in the same area, killing 46 sailors.

Defense Minister Kim Tae-young was grilled by lawmakers who said the government should have taken quicker and stronger retaliatory measures against the North's provocation.

"I am sorry that the government has not carried out ruthless bombing through jet fighters during the North's second round of shelling," said Kim Jang-soo, a lawmaker of ruling Grand National Party and a former defense minister.

Tuesday's attack was the heaviest in the region since the Korean War ended in 1953, and marked the first civilian deaths in an assault since the bombing of a South Korean airliner in 1987.

The United States and Japan urged China to do more to rein in North Korea after the reclusive nation fired scores of artillery shells on Tuesday at a South Korean island near the maritime boundary between the two sides.

Beijing will not be pleased by the deployment of the aircraft carrier and will not respond to such pressure, said Xu Guangyu, a retired major-general in the People's Liberation Army who now works for a government-run arms control organization.

"China will not welcome the U.S. aircraft carrier joining the exercises, because that kind of move can escalate tensions and not relieve them," he said.

"Our biggest objective is stability on the Korean peninsula. That interest is not served by abandoning North Korea, and so there's no need to rethink the basics of the relationship."

Beijing has previously said that an earlier plan to send the USS George Washington to U.S.-South Korea joint exercises threatened long-term damage to Sino-U.S. relations.

Tuesday's bombardment nagged at global markets, already unsettled by worries over Ireland's debt problem and looking to invest in less risky assets. But South Korea's markets, after sharp falls, recovered lost ground.

"If you look back at the last five years when we've had scares, they were all seen as buying opportunities. The rule among hedge funds and long-only funds is that you let the market sell off and watch for your entry point to get involved," said Todd Martin, Asia equity strategist with Societe Generale in Hong Kong.

SEOUL CALM

Pyongyang said the firing was in reaction to military drills conducted by South Korea in the area at the time but Seoul said it had not been firing at the North.

Seoul, a city of over 10 million, was bustling as normal on Wednesday, a sunny autumn day, although developments were being closely watched by office workers on TV and in newspapers. Editorials stepped up pressure on President Lee Myung-bak to respond more toughly than he has to past provocations by the North and two small groups held anti-North Korea protests.

President Barack Obama, woken up in the early hours to be told of the artillery strike, said he was outraged and pressed the North to stop its provocative actions.

Although U.S. officials said the joint exercise was scheduled before the attack by North Korea, it was reminiscent of a crisis in 1996 when then President Bill Clinton sent an aircraft carrier group through the Taiwan Strait after Beijing test-fired missiles into the channel between the mainland and Taiwan.

"My house was burned to the ground," said Cho Soon-ae, 47, who was among 170 or so evacuated from Yeonpyeong on Wednesday.

"We've lost everything. I don't even have extra underwear," she said weeping, holding on to her sixth-grade daughter, as she landed at Incheon.

CALM THINGS DOWN

Despite the rhetoric, regional powers made clear they were looking for a diplomatic way to calm things down.

South Korea, its armed forces technically superior though about half the size of the North's one-million-plus army, warned of "massive retaliation" if its neighbor attacked again.

But it was careful to avoid any immediate threat of retaliation which might spark an escalation of fighting across the Cold War's last frontier.

China has long propped up the Pyongyang leadership, worried that a collapse of the North could bring instability to its own borders and also wary of a unified Korea that would be dominated by the United States, the key ally of the South.

Beijing said it had agreed with the United States to try to restart talks among regional powers over North Korea's nuclear weapons program.

A number of analysts suspect that Tuesday's attack may have been an attempt by North Korean leader Kim jong-il to raise his bargaining position ahead of disarmament talks which he has used in the past to win concessions and aid from the outside world, in particular the United States.


http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL3E6MN0SQ20101124
 
Like it or not, the US military roles around the world also have a positive side too! :D

Yeah i'm yet waiting to see something happening like that on Korean peninsula.Till now it seems they have been pressing one side against the other.Isn't it?:blink:
 
Yeah i'm yet waiting to see something happening like that on Korean peninsula.Till now it seems they have been pressing one side against the other.Isn't it?:blink:

If you look at the history of wars between Japan, China and Korea, and the atrocities perpetrated by all sides, then the role of maintaining peace after WW2 is a success story for the US military presence in the region.

Turning Japan into a democracy and freeing it of the burdensome costs of protecting itself were two important factors in truning it into an industrial powerhouse, from which thw whole world benefited.

Just two quick examples for now! :D
 
Last edited:
Like it or not, the US military roles around the world also have a positive side too! :D

May be it s positive because you are sitting in US!? I suggest you to look deeply into the US military involvment all over the world & where it brings peace. !
 
May be it s positive because you are sitting in US!? I suggest you to look deeply into the US military involvment all over the world & where it brings peace. !

You would be surprised how deeply I look at ALL the evidence WITHOUT prejudice before making my statements. :D
 
If you look at the history of wars between Japan, China and Korea, and the atrociteis perpetrated by all sides, then the role of maintaining peace after WW2 is a success story for the US military presence in the region.

Turning Japan into a democracy and freeing it of the burdensome costs of protecting itself were two important factors in truning it into an industrial powerhouse, from which thw whole world benefited.

Just two quick examples for now! :D

Than i want to give you three examples of instability of whole three regions because of US military presence like Middle east (Iraq), South Asia (Afghanistan) & South America (Columbia).
 
Than i want to give you three examples of instability of whole three regions because of US military presence like Middle east (Iraq), South Asia (Afghanistan) & South America (Columbia).

I could discuss this further, but this thread is about the present situation in Korea and a US Carrier Group heading there.
 
I could discuss this further, but this thread is about the present situation in Korea and a US Carrier Group heading there.

Yesterday someone in another thread was talking of Japan helping R.O.K. in any sort of military operation or full fledged war against D.P.R.K.
Now to boost R.O.K's confidence US Carrier Strike Group will be deployed right at the doorstep of China.And the purpose is said to show the D.P.R.K. that aggression will not be tolerated.
My view is should the hostility break out between R.O.K. and D.P.R.K.(as a result of either rerponse or aggression) the condition can become pretty uncomfortable for China.They won't like US to be in the action alone.:partay::P

I was of the opinion that condition will settle with in a week or so,till media reported that US carrier group is moving in the state of affairs just to show her muscle:D

But now it's becoming interesting.:oops:
Considering Japan,R.O.K, USA on one side.
How can China still remain neutral?

So, repeating my words, R.O.K. and Japan has lot to lose here.Same is with China and US and the condition will settle if allowed to.....
 
@SURB
It would not just be affecting nk sk japan us nd china but would mean disaster to the whole world which is getting back (or atleast trying to)from a huge recession.
OT : Even if it was a planned exercise seeing the chances of escalation US could have delayed its exersise with korea.
one cant stop thinking that US is obsessed with wars and it cant live without one.
 
People will see that this event will die it's own death.I'm not supporting any party ,and being neutral i think those who consider than that there will a strong retaliation and Japan and R.O.K. will collaborate to end North Korea miseries.:D
Will see that even US carrier support won't even let it happen.Putting a carrier there means entering right between two nuclear powers(talking of D.P.R.K. and China).
And you need to be an idiot to suppose that a full fledged war will start there.Untill USA herself takes the initiative to attack directly or indirectly via South Korea.Which is highly unlikely considering their position there as i mentioned above.:) and that South korea is no position to handle it ,but to wait and go nuclear first to equate the power balance.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom