What's new

Trump commits to $750 billion defense budget in 2020

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 19, 2014
17,112
3
21,676
Country
United States
Location
United States
CNN) — President Donald Trump has agreed to a request from Defense Secretary James Mattis to propose a defense budget of $750 billion for the coming year, marking a reversal from plans to shrink defense spending, an administration official confirmed to CNN.

Last week, Trump appeared to call the Defense Department budget of $716 billion "crazy" in a tweet. The next day Mattis and key Republican lawmakers who oppose any defense budget cuts met with the President for lunch to discuss military funding.
The agreement on the $750 billion budget came out of the meeting last Tuesday, which was attended by Trump, Mattis and the chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services committees, Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, and Sen. James Inhofe, R-Oklahoma.

"The President fully supports the National Defense Strategy and continuing to rebuild the military," the official said. "With the help of Sen. Inhofe and Chairman Thornberry, President Trump agreed to $750 billion topline."

Politico first reported the decision to increase the budget proposal.

The larger number tracks with what some experts, including a congressionally appointed panel, have said should be a yearly 3 to 5% increase to the defense budget, which includes money for the military as well as the nuclear weapons elements of the Department of Energy.

The meeting last week came as the Trump administration floated a 5% cut to the Defense Department, reducing the defense budget from $716 billion allocated in 2019 to $700 billion in 2020 as part of a federal government-wide effort to reduce the deficit. Defense officials were planning on a $733 billion budget for 2020 prior to the proposed cuts.

The Department is committed to ensuring our military remains the most lethal force in the world. We are working with OMB (Office of Management and Budget) to determine the department's topline number," Lt. Col. Mike Andrews, a Defense Department spokesman, told CNN.

Defense officials had said anything under $733 billion would increase risk.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/09/po...se-spending/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/
 
Too little. 1500 billion would be more like it. They need more than 3 Zumwalt and 178 F-22. BUT, Dems control House in January. Dems would never approve. They want welfare, not military.
 
Too little. 1500 billion would be more like it. They need more than 3 Zumwalt and 178 F-22. BUT, Dems control House in January. Dems would never approve. They want welfare, not military.
USA doesnt has money, health sectoris at brink of collapse, social security has over spent the savings already
DeBT to GDP ratio is going sharply high..at some time this trend will have to be reveresed

in 10-20 years when most infrasture becomes older, usa will need 100-200b dollars to inject in that too..only solution is rising taxes..but the demand for universal health is going up too..
 
USA doesnt has money, health sectoris at brink of collapse, social security has over spent the savings already
DeBT to GDP ratio is going sharply high..at some time this trend will have to be reveresed

in 10-20 years when most infrasture becomes older, usa will need 100-200b dollars to inject in that too..only solution is rising taxes..but the demand for universal health is going up too..

doctors are overpaid. cut the doctor salaries. things will be fine in health care sector

infrastructure needs to be rebuilt. it will cost a trillion plus dollars. we can print money and build it.
 
Too little. 1500 billion would be more like it. They need more than 3 Zumwalt and 178 F-22. BUT, Dems control House in January. Dems would never approve. They want welfare, not military.
With homeless on almost every main street, foreclosures more than houses for sale , USA has problems and the trade war isn't going to help.
 
@doorstar its waste of time talking to that clueless troll undertaker. It just spams same thing over and over....it is incapable of critical thought and actual conversation.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom