What's new

The shifting qualities of 'Made in China'

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 30, 2014
27,843
70
98,200
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
The shifting qualities of 'Made in China'
June 26, 2015
001ec949c22b16f7050c05.jpg

Workers take photos of the robot welding production line in a plant owned by Sicher Elevator Co. Ltd., where 1.65 billion yuan (US$263 million) has been invested in replacing workers with robots. [Photo: Beijing Review]



The development of manufacturing industry has been a key contributor to China's economic transformation. This will be so in China's next stages of development too.

According to World Bank data, China's manufacturing industry now accounts for almost 20 percent of global manufacturing output. This production quantity is impressive, if not staggering, but the macroeconomic factors that led to China's comparative advantage are now rapidly eroding and giving way to a "new normal", which is characterized by rising labor and operating costs, persistent periods of sluggish international demand, and an increasingly sophisticated domestic consumer with rising quality standards and rapidly changing tastes. As a result, domestic manufacturing growth has been slowing at a more rapid rate than the broader economy.

If China's massive manufacturing base - deliberately developed over many years - to remain a major source of domestic employment and economic activity, it must rapidly transform and upgrade. To engineer this redirection in the industry, Premier Li Keqiang has put forward a concept dubbed "Made in China 2025", and the State Council, China's Cabinet, has set up a leading group for the ambitious plan. Led by vice-premier Ma Kai, the group will coordinate, deliberate and implement plans for becoming a world manufacturing power. This means the government is actively seeking to translate the qualities associated with "Made in China" from a past era of scale and replication to those that are identified with the creation of high value-added products.

To achieve this, China needs to encourage entrepreneurship, expand government incentives that target and enable small and medium-sized enterprises to develop, and support the further expansion of overseas mergers and acquisitions. Improved vocational training will also be critical to success.

China is actively supporting the development of a new wave of manufacturers that it hopes will transition the country away from lower-value production to a focus on higher-value, advanced-technological and specialized manufacturing. To do so, the government seeks to develop domestic innovative brands, products and intellectual property through a process it refers to as "mass entrepreneurship and innovation".

This commitment to innovation is evident today in the growth of research and development expenditures. In KPMG recent report on global manufacturing outlook, we identified shifting perspectives on research and innovation among China-based manufacturing executives. We asked executives about their manufacturing plans for China, and 93 percent of the respondents said they would spend at least 4 percent of their revenues on R&D for the next 24 months. Two years ago, only 65 percent of the executives asked the same question had said so. Globally, 74 percent of the executives, responding to the same question, said they planned to spend more than 4 percent of their revenues on R&D. This indicates a significant rise in the emphasis on R&D in China.

As global enterprises seek to innovate in China in order to strengthen and defend their relevance to the country's emerging middle class, Chinese companies are increasingly looking overseas to acquire the skills and technology to leapfrog competitors in their domestic development. This growing wave of outbound mergers and acquisitions are fueled, in our view, less by the desire to establish overseas representation and capture foreign market share than by the need to acquire the tools necessary to effectively compete in an increasingly innovation-driven domestic manufacturing industry.

China must transition from its role as an imitator and outsourcer for the developed world to become an innovator and creator of solutions that incorporate and advance best-in-class technologies. This will be the new brand of "Made in China".

David Frey is partner and head of Asia Pacific industrial manufacturing, KPMG China, and Luke Treloar is senior manager, markets strategy, KPMG China.
 
The shifting qualities of 'Made in China'
June 26, 2015
001ec949c22b16f7050c05.jpg

Workers take photos of the robot welding production line in a plant owned by Sicher Elevator Co. Ltd., where 1.65 billion yuan (US$263 million) has been invested in replacing workers with robots. [Photo: Beijing Review]



The development of manufacturing industry has been a key contributor to China's economic transformation. This will be so in China's next stages of development too.

According to World Bank data, China's manufacturing industry now accounts for almost 20 percent of global manufacturing output. This production quantity is impressive, if not staggering, but the macroeconomic factors that led to China's comparative advantage are now rapidly eroding and giving way to a "new normal", which is characterized by rising labor and operating costs, persistent periods of sluggish international demand, and an increasingly sophisticated domestic consumer with rising quality standards and rapidly changing tastes. As a result, domestic manufacturing growth has been slowing at a more rapid rate than the broader economy.

If China's massive manufacturing base - deliberately developed over many years - to remain a major source of domestic employment and economic activity, it must rapidly transform and upgrade. To engineer this redirection in the industry, Premier Li Keqiang has put forward a concept dubbed "Made in China 2025", and the State Council, China's Cabinet, has set up a leading group for the ambitious plan. Led by vice-premier Ma Kai, the group will coordinate, deliberate and implement plans for becoming a world manufacturing power. This means the government is actively seeking to translate the qualities associated with "Made in China" from a past era of scale and replication to those that are identified with the creation of high value-added products.

To achieve this, China needs to encourage entrepreneurship, expand government incentives that target and enable small and medium-sized enterprises to develop, and support the further expansion of overseas mergers and acquisitions. Improved vocational training will also be critical to success.

China is actively supporting the development of a new wave of manufacturers that it hopes will transition the country away from lower-value production to a focus on higher-value, advanced-technological and specialized manufacturing. To do so, the government seeks to develop domestic innovative brands, products and intellectual property through a process it refers to as "mass entrepreneurship and innovation".

This commitment to innovation is evident today in the growth of research and development expenditures. In KPMG recent report on global manufacturing outlook, we identified shifting perspectives on research and innovation among China-based manufacturing executives. We asked executives about their manufacturing plans for China, and 93 percent of the respondents said they would spend at least 4 percent of their revenues on R&D for the next 24 months. Two years ago, only 65 percent of the executives asked the same question had said so. Globally, 74 percent of the executives, responding to the same question, said they planned to spend more than 4 percent of their revenues on R&D. This indicates a significant rise in the emphasis on R&D in China.

As global enterprises seek to innovate in China in order to strengthen and defend their relevance to the country's emerging middle class, Chinese companies are increasingly looking overseas to acquire the skills and technology to leapfrog competitors in their domestic development. This growing wave of outbound mergers and acquisitions are fueled, in our view, less by the desire to establish overseas representation and capture foreign market share than by the need to acquire the tools necessary to effectively compete in an increasingly innovation-driven domestic manufacturing industry.

China must transition from its role as an imitator and outsourcer for the developed world to become an innovator and creator of solutions that incorporate and advance best-in-class technologies. This will be the new brand of "Made in China".

David Frey is partner and head of Asia Pacific industrial manufacturing, KPMG China, and Luke Treloar is senior manager, markets strategy, KPMG China.

I pick up my macbook, made in China, I look at my phone, made in China. I look at my car, made in China, instant heart attack LOL.
On a serious note Chinas tech industry is moving leaps and bounds, but Chinese cars I won't buy may be I am biased towards German perfection of BMW :D
 
I pick up my macbook, made in China, I look at my phone, made in China. I look at my car, made in China, instant heart attack LOL.
On a serious note Chinas tech industry is moving leaps and bounds, but Chinese cars I won't buy may be I am biased towards German perfection of BMW :D

Germans and Japanese are good. I would put my trust on these two over US made cars.

But China's auto industry still needs time and further consolidation. Market leaders (domestic) are emerging but the global outreach is still missing.

There are both SOEs and private companies in the sector.
 
Germans and Japanese are good. I would put my trust on these two over US made cars.

But China's auto industry still needs time and further consolidation. Market leaders (domestic) are emerging but the global outreach is still missing.

There are both SOEs and private companies in the sector.

I am not aware of any Chinese Automaker brands, but from what I have heard and seen there are manufacturers who just copy the design and start to produce the automobiles. Another thing China should act stingingly against such companies. Germans are a class of their own, Japanese cars are reliable but still the perfection of Germans is something at a whole different level.

US automakers are the worst offenders, not only their cars lack style and sophistication but at times feel engines were mounted on carts. US can't come even close to German, Japanese or Italians.
 
The shifting qualities of 'Made in China'
June 26, 2015
001ec949c22b16f7050c05.jpg

Workers take photos of the robot welding production line in a plant owned by Sicher Elevator Co. Ltd., where 1.65 billion yuan (US$263 million) has been invested in replacing workers with robots. [Photo: Beijing Review]



The development of manufacturing industry has been a key contributor to China's economic transformation. This will be so in China's next stages of development too.

According to World Bank data, China's manufacturing industry now accounts for almost 20 percent of global manufacturing output. This production quantity is impressive, if not staggering, but the macroeconomic factors that led to China's comparative advantage are now rapidly eroding and giving way to a "new normal", which is characterized by rising labor and operating costs, persistent periods of sluggish international demand, and an increasingly sophisticated domestic consumer with rising quality standards and rapidly changing tastes. As a result, domestic manufacturing growth has been slowing at a more rapid rate than the broader economy.

If China's massive manufacturing base - deliberately developed over many years - to remain a major source of domestic employment and economic activity, it must rapidly transform and upgrade. To engineer this redirection in the industry, Premier Li Keqiang has put forward a concept dubbed "Made in China 2025", and the State Council, China's Cabinet, has set up a leading group for the ambitious plan. Led by vice-premier Ma Kai, the group will coordinate, deliberate and implement plans for becoming a world manufacturing power. This means the government is actively seeking to translate the qualities associated with "Made in China" from a past era of scale and replication to those that are identified with the creation of high value-added products.

To achieve this, China needs to encourage entrepreneurship, expand government incentives that target and enable small and medium-sized enterprises to develop, and support the further expansion of overseas mergers and acquisitions. Improved vocational training will also be critical to success.

China is actively supporting the development of a new wave of manufacturers that it hopes will transition the country away from lower-value production to a focus on higher-value, advanced-technological and specialized manufacturing. To do so, the government seeks to develop domestic innovative brands, products and intellectual property through a process it refers to as "mass entrepreneurship and innovation".

This commitment to innovation is evident today in the growth of research and development expenditures. In KPMG recent report on global manufacturing outlook, we identified shifting perspectives on research and innovation among China-based manufacturing executives. We asked executives about their manufacturing plans for China, and 93 percent of the respondents said they would spend at least 4 percent of their revenues on R&D for the next 24 months. Two years ago, only 65 percent of the executives asked the same question had said so. Globally, 74 percent of the executives, responding to the same question, said they planned to spend more than 4 percent of their revenues on R&D. This indicates a significant rise in the emphasis on R&D in China.

As global enterprises seek to innovate in China in order to strengthen and defend their relevance to the country's emerging middle class, Chinese companies are increasingly looking overseas to acquire the skills and technology to leapfrog competitors in their domestic development. This growing wave of outbound mergers and acquisitions are fueled, in our view, less by the desire to establish overseas representation and capture foreign market share than by the need to acquire the tools necessary to effectively compete in an increasingly innovation-driven domestic manufacturing industry.

China must transition from its role as an imitator and outsourcer for the developed world to become an innovator and creator of solutions that incorporate and advance best-in-class technologies. This will be the new brand of "Made in China".

David Frey is partner and head of Asia Pacific industrial manufacturing, KPMG China, and Luke Treloar is senior manager, markets strategy, KPMG China.



Yes, especially in the area of high technology exports, the top seven countries is this regard are:
China, Germany, US, Singapore, South Korea, France & Japan.

High-technology exports (current US$)
High-technology exports are products with high R&D intensity, such as in aerospace, computers, pharmaceuticals, scientific instruments, and electrical machinery. Data are in current U.S. dollars.
United Nations, Comtrade database.


Untitled.png


High-technology exports (current US$) | Data | Table

P.S.: Thanks to @j20blackdragon for first providing the source link.
 


Haval is pretty big in China. It is a Great Wall Motors brand.

Then there is BYD with a full line of cars: 比亚迪汽车官方网站

Geely probably has the largest international exposure: < ?php echo (isset($sub_title)?$sub_title.' - ':'').(isset($site_title)?$site_title:'')?>

Haval is by far the best-selling SUV brand in China。:D

And BYD just nudged into the global No. 1 spot for clean-energy(HEV、PHEV and BEV)passenger car sales in May,displacing erstwhile leader Nissan。
 
Last edited:
I pick up my macbook, made in China, I look at my phone, made in China. I look at my car, made in China, instant heart attack LOL.
On a serious note Chinas tech industry is moving leaps and bounds, but Chinese cars I won't buy may be I am biased towards German perfection of BMW :D

not biased``its a fact, Europe makes the best cars```I am a huge fan of Mercedes, Porsche, Land Rover and Bentley````
 
I am not aware of any Chinese Automaker brands, but from what I have heard and seen there are manufacturers who just copy the design and start to produce the automobiles. Another thing China should act stingingly against such companies. Germans are a class of their own, Japanese cars are reliable but still the perfection of Germans is something at a whole different level.

US automakers are the worst offenders, not only their cars lack style and sophistication but at times feel engines were mounted on carts. US can't come even close to German, Japanese or Italians.
As if you make enough money to own/drive cars from all those makers to know which is better. :lol:

The best and final gauge is always the car that the average citizen -- of any country -- can buy and use on a DAILY basis. I have driven in the UK, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. The BMWs and Audis that are sold in luxury dealerships in the US would not be affordable for the average citizens of their countries of origins. The differences involved more than just style and sophistication, the qualities you alleged yourself to know, but of size of the vehicles, safety features such as glass and lighting, emission controls, and many more.

The Toyota heavy trucks are styled, designed, and manufactured in the US and they are not for Japanese consumers for reasons of price, size, and practicality in Japan. Same for Nissan with their heavy trucks. I have seen the expressions of local Japanese the first time they saw a US-spec Toyota Tundra V-8 owned by an American USAF sergeant who shipped his truck over to JPN. They were amazed that Toyota make trucks that huge. An American enlisted can afford it, but never a Japanese.

Porsche 911s are mostly for foreign sales as there are less Germans who can afford them than there are Americans who can.

Porsche - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 2008, Porsche reported selling a total of 98,652 cars, 13,524 (13.7%) as domestic German sales, and 85,128 (86.3%) internationally.
There are plenty of personal testimonies of Americans who lived in worked in various European countries and the reality of the average worker's car is nothing like the fanciful 'analysis' you are trying to pass off here. :lol:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom