What's new

The Shape of Things to Come

VCheng

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 29, 2010
48,423
57
40,737
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
This is an important article, for it portends yet another great revolution in manfacturing, with the potential of rich rewards, including economic dominance, for its leaders:


from: 3D printing: The shape of things to come | The Economist


3D printing
The shape of things to come
When products are printed, they often look like nature intended

Dec 10th 2011 | FRANKFURT | from the print edition

EUROMOLD, a big manufacturing trade fair held in Frankfurt from November 29th to December 2nd, was—as might be expected—full of machines and robots demonstrating their ability to cut, bend, weld and bash all sorts of objects into shape. But in one of the halls the scene was very different. It was here that 300 or so exhibitors working in three-dimensional printing (or “additive manufacturing” as they prefer to call it) were gathered. Some of their 3D printers were the size of cars; others were desktop models. All worked, though, by building products up layer by layer from powered metal, droplets of plastic or whatever was the appropriate material.

The range of those products was as unusual as the way they were made: an exhaust manifold; an artificial leg; an aircraft door-hinge; dozens of shoes; even entire dresses can be fashioned this way. Many of these printed items look strikingly different from their conventional counterparts. They are more elegant, less clunky and have flowing lines. The result, shown off on plinths and in display cases, was more like an art gallery than an industrial exhibition.

Additive manufacturing, then, is changing not only how things are made, but what is made. In particular, many of the objects on display had an organic look to them. That is no accident. In some cases, designers have deliberately copied nature. In others, they have started from first principles, drawn conclusions (usually aided by clever software), and found that nature got there first. And in some, the decisions have been aesthetic—presumably reflecting an evolved preference in the human psyche for objects that look natural.

Growing goods

An excellent example of deliberately copying nature is an artificial hip made by Materialise, a Belgian firm. Not only do real bones have curves that mass production would find it impossible to reproduce, they are also slightly different from one individual to another. Additive manufacturing has no difficulty with such bespoke products. Each hip can be crafted precisely for the intended patient. All that is required is a slight tweak of the software that controls the printer. Even better, the technique can do something that not even a human craftsman could manage: it can copy in the titanium of which the implant is made, the fine, lattice-like internal structure of natural bone. This makes the implant lighter, without loss of strength. It also lets it integrate easily with the patient’s actual bone.

Similarly, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, led by Neri Oxman, have found that you cannot beat the basic design of a plant stem—a bundle of vertical filaments of different densities—when it comes to making a structure that is both light and able to support a heavy load. They have used that insight to print a load-bearing column constructed from filaments of concrete.

That an artificial hip looks like a natural one, and that a concrete “tree” behaves like a real one, is, of course the whole point of the exercise. Other additive manufacturers, though, have found that they are copying nature by accident—natural selection having arrived at a similar way of solving the problem first.

A British firm called Within Technologies, for example, makes heat exchangers. These need to pack a large surface area into a small space—an ideal task for additive manufacturing. Freed from the need to worry about how to make what they design, the company’s engineers have found that the optimum shape resembles a fish gill. Exchanging heat is a similar process to exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide.

The nervous systems of animals, too, turn out to be similar to things made possible by additive manufacturing. Lionel Dean, the head of a firm called FutureFactories, has designed a car mirror that includes channels which carry the electrical signals that operate its adjustment and folding mechanisms. The result resembles the nerves in an arm, which are also carried in channels (the joints in the mirror behave like the arm itself). At the moment, Mr Dean cannot find suitable conductive materials with which to print his new mirror. The rate of progress in the field suggests, though, that he will not have to wait long.

The flow of hydraulic fluid in a gearbox also turns out to be surprisingly biological. Ian Halliday, the boss of 3T RPD, a British engineering firm, says that by making a gearbox’s hydraulics using additive manufacturing, its weight can be reduced by 30%. These days, that is par for the additive-manufacturing course. What is novel is that the box will also change gear faster, because the pathways through which the fluid flows can be made smoother. Like blood, hydraulic fluid flows better through smooth arteries than ones filled with obstructions and sharp corners.

Some designs even resemble sub-cellular structures. At Southampton University in Britain, researchers have printed an unmanned aircraft from laser-sintered nylon (sintering is a way of making objects by heating powders). This drone, which has a wingspan of 1.2 metres, incorporates a geodetic structure—a lattice-like frame developed in the 1930s by Barnes Wallis, a British aeronautical engineer. Though Wallis could not have known this at the time, his geodetic approach is similar in concept to the “cytoskeleton” of fibrous proteins that holds a cell in shape. While notably strong and light, geodetic structures are slow and costly to make by traditional methods—but not by 3D printing.

The hole is greater than the parts

That ability to create light, strong structures which have complex internal shapes may well turn out to be additive manufacturing’s killer app. The layering of powders or droplets that are then sintered into solidity, or cured with heat or ultraviolet light, allows spaces to be left inside the product. And if such a space would otherwise collapse, it can be filled with a powder that remains intact during curing and is then washed out or blown away. Even moving parts, like clock mechanisms, have thus been made in one go in a 3D printer.

3D printing can even mix materials that could not be compounded with traditional methods. According to David Leigh, the president of Harvest Technologies, a Texan firm that uses additive manufacturing, it is now possible to produce things that are rubberlike at one end and stiff at the other. A camera body, for instance, could be made in one piece but be soft where it is gripped and hard where the lens and the operating mechanism are installed.

All of which is very useful and practical. But additive manufacturing can also be fun. Ping Fu, the boss of Geomagic, an American firm that specialises in 3D design software, prints her own shoes. Their elegant, twisting shapes make them look intriguingly plantlike. A BlackBerry case which Mr Dean has made looks as if it has been constructed from linguini. His lamps, chairs and jewellery borrow heavily from natural history. And Iris van Herpen, a Dutch fashion designer, has (see picture) taken 3D printing to the catwalks, with striking clothing collections that reflect natural shapes and yet seem to come from a future age.
 
The Article is based upon a technology that is currently in use on a small scale but is projected to become large scale.

The Technological predictions of this article may or may not come true but one prediction which would definitely not come true is that the technology to "Paint a stradivarius" would make Economies of scale redundant.

The reason for this is that the setting up of printer big enough or having ability to create everything that a person may require would be enormous.It would need to have capacity to store large amount and varied kind of raw materials and would need to have probably billions of accurately moving parts to place every molecule of raw material at the desired position.Also there would be a problem that if a person uses a printer for printing something say a car,then he would use the metals stored in printed and exhaust that portion while wood would remain intact and raw material costs big money and it is not like a computer printer.Materials could change their properties only via a nuclear reaction.

Thus it would always be economical to set factories dedicated to produce single item on large scale.This technology if successful is destined to become another process in manufacturing technology.Even if every prediction made by author comes true it would only be able to replace one factory with another as powerloom replaced handloom.

Also this tech is feasible only with material who can be melted and remoulded.It is impossible to use this tech on material like wood or bakelite.

An Area where this technique could take off is the one where customisation is required but for rest its impact is doubtful.

This article appeared in economist print edition a year ago explaining this tech in detail.Some portion of that article are missing in web edition.

http://www.economist.com/node/18114327
 
Of course this new technology will not replace previously developed technologies; but over a period of time, it can give an important boost to those economies that are at the forefront of applying it to where it delivers the maximum advantages.
 
Of course this new technology will not replace previously developed technologies; but over a period of time, it can give an important boost to those economies that are at the forefront of applying it to where it delivers the maximum advantages.

china is so far ahead in the amount of engineers its currently producing its not even funny. The new tech of the future will come from there

China produces more engineering graduates than India, US: Study - Times Of India

The rise of engineers in China is leaving the US behind - Jul. 29, 2010 :china:
 
china is so far ahead in the amount of engineers its currently producing its not even funny. The new tech of the future will come from there.....................:

Such as? Some tangible examples would be informative.
 
why dont you read the articles you prat there are examples in the second article

Resorting to name calling still does not illustrate how graduating more engineers who can copy but cannot create helps China at the leading edge of technology, Sir.
 
Interesting article!

You might find this interesting VCheng

The debate starts from 16. I didn't find the monologue before that but very interesting debate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Resorting to name calling still does not illustrate how graduating more engineers who can copy but cannot create helps China at the leading edge of technology, Sir.

called you a prat cos we read what you put up before we comment. You clearly dont and waste our time. Here so you dont have to lick on the link:

FORTUNE -- Applied Materials had to fly in 100 interviewers just to screen all the job applicants for its new Solar Technology Center in Xi'an, China, last year. The company wanted to fill 260 high-tech jobs. It got 26,000 resumes. A fraction of those applicants were invited to interview. The final selectees, board member Andy Karsner tells me, "were top-of-their-class, English-speaking engineers. They're the best of the best."

Now some of the most advanced research in this high-value, fast-growing field is being done in China -- instead of in the U.S. with American engineers. Why should we care? Because it's graduation season, when we see how starkly the direction of the American educational system differs from the way that faster-growing economies are headed.

99Email Print CommentThose Chinese solar researchers are the cream of an engineering crop that included an estimated 10,000 Ph.D. graduates last year. This spring the U.S. will graduate about 8,000 Ph.D. engineers, an estimated two-thirds of whom are not U.S. citizens. About 150,000 students who majored in engineering, computer science, information technology, and math will collect bachelor's degrees. The Chinese government claims that in recent years the number in China has been well north of 500,000 and rising fast; even if overstated, as some believe, the real number is much larger than America's, and the quality of those graduates is improving.

Americans should be alarmed, not because we have to beat the Chinese on every statistic, but because those facts threaten the heart of our great economic story. Until the past decade most Americans lived a little better every year. From the nation's beginnings, the engine of that improvement has been technology that makes millions of workers more productive. That's why you learned about Whitney's cotton gin and the McCormick reaper in elementary school. A stagnant living standard has terrible consequences, one of which is that the country eventually stops attracting and keeping the world's best and brightest, triggering a downward spiral that grows ever harder to break.

The spiral may be well under way. Instead of staying in the U.S., our non-U.S. Ph.D. graduates increasingly judge home to be a more attractive option. Anand Pillai, a top talent executive at India's giant HCL Technologies, says that his best young recruits used to insist on being sent to the U.S. for a time, but now many of them resist going: "They see such great opportunities at home."


0:00 /4:35Mickelson tees off better teaching
Its next turn could be the worst. As math and science talent accumulates abroad, companies do more of their hiring there, reducing demand in the U.S. That's partly why undergraduate engineering majors are a shrinking proportion of the total, down from 6.8% to about 4.5% over the past 20 years. Employers then claim they can't find engineers in the U.S. -- so they have to hire abroad.

The fastest-growing college majors in America as of 2007, says the U.S. Education Department, were parks, recreation, leisure, and fitness studies, as well as security and protective services. That's not a great omen for technology breakthroughs. If the next great technological advances in energy, the environment, medicine, and information are made elsewhere, American workers will have a much tougher time earning good pay in those key industries.

When the National Academies (experts in the sciences, engineering, medicine, and research) raised this alarm in a landmark 2005 report, a chorus of quibblers sidetracked the discussion by arguing that China's engineering graduates weren't up to the same standard as America's, so the statistical comparisons weren't valid. Five years later it's clear that the National Academies were prophetic. For America's great economic story to continue, we need to reverse the downward spiral now, before it picks up speed. That means changing our culture -- hard but doable. As our graduates collect their diplomas this spring, we should send the next classes a message: that as an economy we want more science and math majors, and as a society we prize them.
 
In the same video, you'll find some very interesting comments about how immigrants contribute to the US economy particularly the Indians and Chinese.

This is another reason the US will continue to prosper because it still attracts the best minds from everywhere in the world!

(this is a short version)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
................Now some of the most advanced research in this high-value, fast-growing field is being done in China -- instead of in the U.S. with American engineers. Why should we care? Because it's graduation season, when we see how starkly the direction of the American educational system differs from the way that faster-growing economies are headed.....................

So all you can give as an example is a company interviewing fresh graduates for solar technology for a plant in China? What does the plant make? What will the fresh hirees actually do?

You need to see what is behind all these headlines that make you giddy with delusions Sir.

(Oh, and I do read a LOT. You'd be surprised. ;) )
 
So all you can give as an example is a company interviewing fresh graduates for solar technology for a plant in China? What does the plant make? What will the fresh hirees actually do?

You need to see what is behind all these headlines that make you giddy with delusions Sir.

(Oh, and I do read a LOT. You'd be surprised. ;) )

simply reading is not enough. you need to understand what you are reading. your posts show that you dont read and or understand but thats a matter for you until you try to propagate your nonesense
 
simply reading is not enough. you need to understand what you are reading. your posts show that you dont read and or understand but thats a matter for you until you try to propagate your nonesense

Yeah right. My comprehension and analysis are even more impressive than my reading. ;)

Now can you please answer my previous post?

How does hiring fresh grad as production engineers to make solar panels based on western technology put China at the cutting edge of future technology?
 
@ AryanB: You still havent answered VCheng's question of how mass producing engineers helps in the innovation index. Copying is NOT innovation. And as for getting a high number of resumes for a limited number of jobs, well, thats the case with all developing and high population countries.

Btw, if you understood what you read, you wouldnt be posting inane stuff.
 
@ AryanB: You still havent answered VCheng's question of how mass producing engineers helps in the innovation index. Copying is NOT innovation. And as for getting a high number of resumes for a limited number of jobs, well, thats the case with all developing and high population countries.

Btw, if you understood what you read, you wouldnt be posting inane stuff.

yeh youre right - if only he understood he wouldnt post inane stuff :enjoy:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom