is that possible to have a no war pact with india?
generally speaking possibilities always exist.
BTW don't read my reply in response to your query regarding the 'pact' .....

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
is that possible to have a no war pact with india?

In the underlined part above: one can include in the "mad and insane" elements that A.Q.Khan writes about elements like the ISIS/ISIL, Al-Qaeda,TTP , LET, JUD and the whole umbrella of Islamist Organisations in Pakistan that can suborn people in the Strategic Estt. of Pakistan and get their hands on the "trigger", so to speak.
That is also a real and present danger.
As I mentioned to all members across the border who harp on that tune: the probability of that happening is about the same as dolphins evolving wings and shooting laser beams from their heads. The paranoia that goes into the selection and mental screening/observation of personal in these organization is unmatched within the world.

All these equation is of no use. How many will die and how. If even a single Indian die because of nuclear attack than according to rule India will launch at least 50 nuclear weapons against Pakistan including hydrogen bombs, this has been mentioned by officials of GoI. So no nuke!!!
Also in piratical note. the first work of IAF will be taking out Pakistan's nuclear facilities.
In today's scenario there is no point in holding territory. The best possible escalation is Syria styled civil war, worst situation would be massive air interdiction, with ground defence and naval blockade.
that is the deal though if you read the article, To get nuetralize 1000 tanks, it will call for 100 15kt nukes... Imagine the response that would derive.There will not be a nuclear war in this region. 'NASR' missile would be enough to tackle Indian troops if war occurs.![]()
In India-Pakistan scenario both models are not applicable, we have the examples of military operations in swat valley & FATA which negates any Syrian model.
Even naval blockade would not be that much helpful 'in future' because of the following reasons:
- 100% gas and 60% of oil demands are meet from the local resources & industry is working to increase local production of oil.
- Pakistan is almost self-sufficient in food & nutrition.
- Gas pipeline from Iran though is in under big '?' for the time being, but it has its strategic value in the future, therefore it will surely be completed at suitable time, which will also open some other venues of opportunities.
- Though Gwadar and Chabahar ports appear as the alternative to each other, but at the same time both 'have a potential' to serve each other as complementary ports in any future situation.
- Pakistan is almost self sufficient in small arms and ammunition, for the heavier arms our import will be from the North not from the south.
highly unlikely to happen
indian leadership will not compromise its cities and population but if they think like u do they probably would
if pakistan uses the tactical nukes most of the fall out will be contained with pakistan india wont be affected
but by your logic india will retaliate with a massive nuclear strike then so will pakistan
both will be toast![]()
Yes. For a K-15 attack India will need a tug and pontoon as no Indian sub is yet ready for carrying Ballistic missiles.You are right.
But this is not my opinion.Shyam Saran already wrote about this extensively in 'The Hindu'.That is why we developed SSBN ,Each of ourcSSBN can carry 12 k15.Of course Pakistan will retaliate but our aim would be avoiding second chancecto our neighbour by massive non stop second strike.