What's new

The Generals of Mubarak have not Yet Learned to Respect the Will of Egypt

T-Rex

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 7, 2008
9,989
-11
7,444
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Egypt's generals defy Tahrir protests over elections


Jack Shenker and Martin Chulov in Cairo
The Guardian, Friday 25 November 2011


Egypt's ruling generals have defied their critics and declared that national elections will begin as planned in three days' time, even as violent unrest continued to sweep the country and preparations began for a huge rally against the junta.

In a move that seemed certain to escalate tensions between the military government and demonstrators calling for its removal, members of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces declared that to step down now would be a "betrayal" of the people's trust, and insisted that they would not be dislodged by a "slogan-chanting crowd".

Former prime minister Kamal al-Ganzouri accepted an offer from the head of military council, Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, to form a new government. It follows the resignation of prime minister Essam Sharaf and his cabinet earlier in the week.

The appointment of Ganzouri, who served under deposed president Hosni Mubarak, came as revolutionary groups called for a major protest in Tahrir Square, which has been occupied by protesters for almost a week. Deadly clashes between pro-change Egyptians and security forces have left nearly 40 dead and more than 2,000 injured, transforming parts of central Cairo and other major cities into a warzone.

Egypt's outgoing interior minister said that in the current climate he could not guarantee the security of the forthcoming parliamentary vote and raised the prospect of a postponement, giving heart to many protesters who believe that the ballot will have no credibility as long it is conducted under military rule.

But at a later press conference army generals announced elections would begin as scheduled on Monday, fuelling anger in Tahrir Square, which has once again become the centre of revolutionary struggle, after the uprising this year.

"There is a general feeling to call off the elections completely," said Nasser Abdul Mohsena, an opponent of the junta who has been demonstrating in the capital. "The military rulers have used these past months to build up a regime, not build a state."

A deserting army captain, Omar Matwali, denounced the detention of Ahmed Shoman – another army captain who attempted to join the protests this week, raising the possibility of splits emerging within the army under the military council's rule. Speaking in Tahrir Square on Thursday night, he said several officers were supporting Magdy Hetata, a retired senior general and former chief of staff of Egypt's armed forces, in an apparent bid to lead a new "council of elders" that would replace the junta and oversee the transition to democracy.

This week evidence emerged of live ammunition being used against demonstrators, with autopsy records indicating that at least 22 civilians have been gunned down by live rounds. Reporters Without Borders, an international press freedom body, condemned what it said was a growing number of detentions and beatings of journalists by security forces, including the arrest of an American documentary film-maker and her cameraman and the alleged incarceration of and sexual assault against Mona Eltahaway, a prominent Egyptian-American columnist. "The chaos prevailing in Cairo and the resulting grave human rights violations are as bad as in the darkest hours of the revolution's earlier phase," claimed the organisation. "Journalists are now the unwanted witnesses of the army's desperate attempts to hold on to power and Reporters Without Borders fears that the abuses against media personnel could worsen."

In Cairo's Mohamed Mahmoud street, site of the most intense fighting in recent days, an uneasy truce held for most of Thursday after soldiers moved in to separate armed police and protesters. A barbed wire barricade now stands between the interior ministry and Tahrir Square, though many demonstrators said they would maintain a presence in the strategically important thoroughfare to block security forces from making any surprise attacks.

"We won't leave here, because if we hadn't blocked the street for the last few days the central security forces would have entered the square," Sayed Salah, a revolutionary activist, told Egyptian news outlet Al-Masry Al-Youm. "We don't trust the military; they let us get beaten up yesterday."

In a bid to calm tensions, the military council used its official Facebook page to apologise for protester deaths and offered to set up a military field hospital in Tahrir to help tend to the wounded. "The Scaf is extremely sorry for the fallen martyrs of the children of Egypt in the latest incidents in Tahrir Square," read a statement on the website. "The Scaf offers its condolences to the families of martyrs throughout Egypt."

The support of the Muslim Brotherhood, which has been heavily criticised in some quarters for not officially taking part in the ongoing protests, will be essential for any new prime minister wishing to build consensus across the political spectrum. On Thursday the organisation defended its decision to press ahead with the upcoming elections and not join Tahrir Square, saying its presence could have exacerbated tensions. But reports in the Egyptian media suggested that the Brotherhood's stance was sparking internal division, with one prominent leader reportedly threatening to quit the movement.
 
Muslim Brotherhood is not really caring about the protests
They play the double card smartly: they didn't participate in the protest really but they are not against it
The goal of this has well be explained there:
Al-Ahram Hebdo, Evnement | La charte honnie des principes constitutionnels
sorry it is in French but i can resume what is said is they hope a new charte could be accepted that is as described here:

Ladite charte restreint les prérogatives du Parlement élu en ce qui a trait à la composition de la commission constituante chargée d’élaborer la Constitution. Selon la charte, l’Assemblée du peuple sera représentée par 20 membres seulement, ceci dans une commission de 100 membres. Alors que les 80 restants sont censés être des personnalités de la société civile, des syndicalistes et des personnalités issues d’institutions religieuses comme Al-Azhar et l’Eglise. Les islamistes refusent toute restriction des prérogatives du Parlement en ce qui a trait à la composition de cette commission, d’autant plus que tous les pronostics affirment qu’ils rafleront un grand nombre de sièges et qu’ils domineront le Parlement. Si les choses vont dans ce sens, ils seront en mesure de rédiger une Constitution qui répond à leur désir, celui de bâtir un Etat appliquant la charia.
Charte says assembly of people will have only 20 persons inside a commission of 100 members. 80 other will be thre representative of civil /society , union, religious .. from them of course the Al-Azhar . Islamists refuse any restriction of the power of parliament on this issue .. and since they will win majority of seats , it means then they will decide of the constitution. including sharia in the constitution as is their goal.
 
Muslim Brotherhood is not really caring about the protests
They play the double card smartly: they didn't participate in the protest really but they are not against it
The goal of this has well be explained there:
Al-Ahram Hebdo, Evnement | La charte honnie des principes constitutionnels
sorry it is in French but i can resume what is said is they hope a new charte could be accepted that is as described here:


Charte says assembly of people will have only 20 persons inside a commission of 100 members. 80 other will be thre representative of civil /society , union, religious .. from them of course the Al-Azhar . Islamists refuse any restriction of the power of parliament on this issue .. and since they will win majority of seats , it means then they will decide of the constitution. including sharia in the constitution as is their goal.
The problem is not the Muslim Brotherhood really. I am not a big fan of them, but they are considered Liberal if you compare them to the Salafis"Wahabis" who are a very closed minded.
 
Muslim Brotherhood is not really caring about the protests
They play the double card smartly: they didn't participate in the protest really but they are not against it
The goal of this has well be explained there:
Al-Ahram Hebdo, Evnement | La charte honnie des principes constitutionnels
sorry it is in French but i can resume what is said is they hope a new charte could be accepted that is as described here:


Charte says assembly of people will have only 20 persons inside a commission of 100 members. 80 other will be thre representative of civil /society , union, religious .. from them of course the Al-Azhar . Islamists refuse any restriction of the power of parliament on this issue .. and since they will win majority of seats , it means then they will decide of the constitution. including sharia in the constitution as is their goal.

The contemporary Islamic political parties in the Muslim World have miserably failed to counter the conspiracy and the propaganda war that has been going on for the last hundred years. At crucial moments they make monumental mistakes and the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt is making one right now by not clearly supporting the revolutionaries. What these young people did in months these incompetent Islamists could not do in a century. The Islamists clearly need competent leaders if they are to make any difference in the Muslim World.
 
Netanyahu warning on uprisings: Islamic, anti-Western and anti-Israel
Harriet Sherwood
November 26, 2011


JERUSALEM: Benjamin Netanyahu has launched a scathing attack on the uprisings in the Middle East, saying Arab countries are ''moving not forward, but backward'' and support from the US and European countries was naive.

The Prime Minister, addressing the Israeli parliament, gave a strikingly pessimistic survey of the tumultuous events in the Arab world.

He said the Arab Spring was becoming an ''Islamic, anti-western, anti-liberal, anti-Israeli, undemocratic wave''.
Advertisement: Story continues below

Speaking to the parliament amid renewed protests and violence in Egypt, Mr Netanyahu said concessions to the Palestinians were unwise in a period of instability in the region.

''In February, when millions of Egyptians thronged to the streets in Cairo, commentators and quite a few Israeli members of the opposition said that we're facing a new era of liberalism and progress … They said I was trying to scare the public and was on the wrong side of history and don't see where things are heading.'' But, he told the Knesset, events had proved him correct.

When he cautioned Barack Obama and other Western leaders against backing the revolt against Hosni Mubarak's regime, he was told he failed to understand reality. ''I ask today, who here didn't understand reality? Who here didn't understand history?''

Those calling for a swift resolution of Israel's conflict with the Palestinians in the context of regional upheavals were misguided, he said.

''Israel is facing a period of instability and uncertainty in the region. This is certainly not the time to listen to those who say follow your heart … I remember many of you urged me to seize the opportunity to make hasty concessions, to rush to an agreement.

''We can't know who will end up with any piece of territory we give up. Reality is changing all the time, and if you don't see it, your head is buried in the sand.''

The foundations of stability and security were essential for any peace deal with the Palestinians, he said.

Israel has been monitoring confrontations between protesters and security forces in Cairo and other Egyptian cities, and has concerns about the outcome of elections next week.

It fears Islamist parties will be a pivotal bloc in the next parliament, will strengthen ties with Hamas in Gaza and may seek to renegotiate parts of the 1979 peace treaty between Israel and Egypt.

''It's expected that the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist parties will dominate the government, and we are concerned that their success will encourage other Islamic radical parties in the Middle East to act more openly to achieve their goals,'' said Eli Shaked, a former Israeli ambassador to Egypt.

Diplomats have failed to persuade Israel and the Palestinians to return to talks. Israel refuses to negotiate with a Palestinian unity government which includes Hamas, which is possible should reconciliation talks between the two factions make progress.

The Palestinians say they will not return to talks while Israel continues to build and expand settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom