While looking at these names:
Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi
Abu Omar al-Baghdadi
Ibrahim Awad Al - Badri
One can expect the next Khalifa name to be:
Othman Ibn Affan al-Baghdadi
And after him will be Ali Ibn Abi Talib al-Baghdadi
Concentrate on the name al-Baghdadi.. because it has not been chosen in vain..
In fact it was deliberately chosen to complete the theatrical drama and the historical series to attract crowds and followers from the Atlantic ocean to the Persian Gulf..and specifically the name Al Baghdadi (From Baghdad) to attract all the people of Iraq..
The question becomes then:
Is Ibrahim Awad al - Badri (a.k.a Abu bakr al-Baghdadi) from Baghdad?
The answer is absolutely no..and there is no one named Ibrahim Awad al-Badri.. it is an intelligence coined name like "James Bond" or other names created by international intelligence agencies.. because we are in a media explosion era, in which we can find anything on any famous person by some people who know him for long and who write about him all the time _to get some fame too, or be paid for that_..
But, Suddenly, a fictitious name Omar al - Baghdadi and another time Bakr al - Baghdadi or another one yet Awad al - Badri appears.. And Iran innocents itself from him by issuing documented information on him through the media channels or associates depicting him as Jewish, Israeli, etc...
Al - Baghdadi Documentary
This raises too many questions:
For now let us analyse the sermon he delivered after he was approved as the Khalifa in the mosque!
1- He delivers the same sermons as Abu Jaafar al-Mansur
2- He wares the same dress as Abu Jaafar al-Mansour; turban, robe etc...
3- A Long beard
As if we were in a movie series talking about the Caliph Abu Jaafar al-Mansur and the director applied everything up to the sermon to be delivered to the public when he said you have chosen me and I am not from your best etc.. The same words and speeches as Abu Jaafar al-Mansur!
From an intelligence point of view, this shows that this personality has been prepared by a foreign intelligence director..
Noted during the sermon: There is a photographer and there is a producer etc...
And the director deliberately did not show the images of any of the guards who have forced the people to approve of al - Baghdadi in the mosque..
This means that we were like in a theatre watching a movie with actors in it, and the hero of the film is "Abu bakr al-Baghdadi"..
So, after we touched on the play in terms of choosing the names, the dress, the script and product etc...carefully.. We start with other aspects:
1) In most Muslim countries and in the West, when you have any sermons at any mosque you are being monitored by the intelligence services..
The answer is that it is monitored accurately and this is what happen in Iraq too; they are watching even the homes, so how he managed to address and announce the Khorouj and the creation of DAESH without the appearance of any Iraqi forces to besiege the site?
Or is not Iraq supported by Iran, the US, the Iraqi army, the popular militias,...etc?
So, is it reasonable to accept that there is no supervision of the largest mosque and there is no interference from the government?
No, it makes no sense at all..
2) He claims that he is a Sunni and that he is an emir of DAESH that preaches Sunni Islam and the whole world counts it on the Sunnis and not on the Shiites, so much so that Iran and al - Rufaidis attribute it to the Sunni states only and the Gulf states in particular..
So it is to be understood that its enemies are the Shiite Iran which are (supposedly) the enemy of the Sunnis..
But this statement raises so may questions:
1- Why, since his very first days, till Russia came out saying that he was killed, he did not he issue a single letter condemning or attacking Iran with words?
2- Why he did not execute any terrorist act in Iran? and Why all his speeches are directed to attack Saudi Arabia?
There is not one speech of him attacking Iran!
3- Why when Saudi Arabia started Assifat al A'zm in Yemen, it was attacked only by Iran, al-Baghdadi and the Hizbollah? Why would he attack Saudi Arabia just as Iran and the Hizbollah did?
4- Why not one speech of him was issued attacking Turkey or Israel?
5- Why his death was announced only by Russia?
The answer to the question is that Russia is linked to Iran. When Iran withdrew him, Russia announced his death..
6- Why DAESH blow up the Saudi mosques.. even the Prophet's Mosque and Masjid al-Haram did not escape from DAESH, and we have never seen a single bombing in Najaf or Karbala, for example?
The simplest answer is that the orders were coming from Iran.. but there is more to it..
7- Why was did he slaughter hundreds of thousands of Sunnis and slayed the Shiites very little?
8- Why are they fighting the free army with Bashar? And why Hizbollah and Bashar are not fighting DAESH?
9- Why all duties of DAESH in Syria are in areas liberated by the Free Army?
10- Why four hours after conquering Mosul they stopped before reaching Baghdad, especially when/since the largest army in Iraq fell easily before them?
11- Why did they kill the elders of the Sunnis tribes in Iraq, such as Jerba's Shaykh Shamar and Ibn Hilal's Sheikh Anza,.. etc..?
12- Why have they killed people 2000 from the tribe of Shu'aitat in one day?
13- Why did they expand in Syria and not in Iran?
14- A besieged organization under siege from Iran, Iraq and Turkey, and suddenly they showcase thousands of Jeeps loaded with weapons!?
15- Why the US sends/drops them arms and say that it was done by mistake?
16- Why the US rejected the Saudi decision to send troops to eliminate the organization?
17- A stalked and and wanted Organization has the devices of issuing car plates, passports, Identity cards, Internet, ...etc.?
18- We observed that even those who have been executed by them wore orange clothes with filming and directing,... etc.!
19- Why the leaders of this organization hide from the members of the organization?
But at the end it is important to explain the idea of establishing the DAESH organization in the first place.. For this idea is an American and British intelligence operation called " hornet's nest"..
This plan was exposed by one of the British intelligence operatives, who said that there is a plan agreed upon to create an Islamic organization to attract all the terrorists in the Arab world and the in the rest of the world in general, so they can be easily eliminated..
And obviously, Iran has prepared and paved the ground for them when it needed this strong presence..
why, how and what for, Iran needed the presence of DAESH?
The answer is that when the free army seemed to be winning against Bashar and taking city after the other and the whole world condemned Bashar and accused him of destroying his people. Iran's came to the rescue and wanted to prove to the world that these were terrorists and not from the Syrian people..
So, Iran tried make the Syrian people believe the illusion that these were not a free army, but terrorists shedding blood and thus DAESH was made to hit two birds with a single stone; first, to fight the free army through it, and second, to make the world believe that those who were fighting Bashar are terrorists..
Iran then made or helped make/create DAESH and was hence blessed by the West to implement his plan of the "hornet's nest"..
Iran has a history of making plans for the western armies when their interests diverge, like in Afghanistan or the invasion of Iraq or in this instance of creating Daesh (a.k,a ISIS)
PS: I apologise in advance if this essay offends anyone.. it was based on facts and only facts.. conclusions might be wrong due to the complexities of the espionage world and intelligence work, but they do have some truth to them based on the results that have appeared afterwards..