What's new

Syrian rebels reportedly promised air cover

Falcon29

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 13, 2013
32,429
-10
22,767
Country
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Location
United States
South Syria rebels reportedly promised air cover



South Syria rebels reportedly
promised air cover

syriajetcrashin.jpg

BEIRUT – Free Syrian Army rebels in southern Syria have reportedly been promised “Arab air cover” as they ramp up their military campaign against the regime.

“Rebel factions in the area are preparing for large-scale military operations and have received promises of Arab air cover, or at least the provision of anti-aircraft rockets,” a source in the FSA told Alaraby Aljadeed in an article published Tuesday.

The source—an officer in the FSA’s Yarmouk Army who preferred to remain anonymous—said that the factions might not wait longer than a week to launch the new offensives, even if the promised air support was not provided by then.

The London-based daily also spoke with an official in the FSA-affiliated Southern Front coalition of rebels who echoed the claims of the Yarmouk Army officer.

“There have been serious signals that the Southern Front will receive Arab support within days,” Southern Front Military Command member Ayman Alaasmi told the paper.

The report comes days after former Lebanese Premier Saad Hariri, who is close to the Saudi royal family, told Arab reporters in a closed meeting in Washington that “air cover” for rebels in the southern and northern Syria was inevitable.

The Lebanese political leader stressed that “such action could come regardless of Washington’s position,” Al-Arabiya television reported.


.................
 

I agree but because of two reasons. Firstly, I don't believe Turkey will get involved, it's not the Turkish peoples conflict and the Turkish population doesn't want to get entangled into it. The major reason for me is that this was brought up but called off because Jordan and Egypt oppose the idea. Only Saudi Arabia wants to make this move. Jordan prefers Assad over Islamists in Syria, same with Israel and West. Jordan closed it's crossing completely after Nusra Front captured it from regime.

Saudi Arabia should do it, it will have all Arab Muslims behind it. If it occurs the West will panic.
 
I agree but because of two reasons. Firstly, I don't believe Turkey will get involved, it's not the Turkish peoples conflict and the Turkish population doesn't want to get entangled into it. The major reason for me is that this was brought up but called off because Jordan and Egypt oppose the idea. Only Saudi Arabia wants to make this move. Jordan prefers Assad over Islamists in Syria, same with Israel and West. Jordan closed it's crossing completely after Nusra Front captured it from regime.
Mate, i agree with your post, regarding the Turkey part. However article doesn't mention Turkey.
 
“There have been serious signals that the Southern Front will receive Arab support within days,” Southern Front Military Command member Ayman Alaasmi told the paper.

wow... these criminals even have formal titles, "southern front military command" and all. :lol:

and if these nato-puppet gcc monarchies send their airforces, i hope syria does to saudia what saddam did... i hope russia joins in.

Jordan prefers Assad over Islamists in Syria, same with Israel and West

:rofl:

@Syrian Lion
 
I agree but because of two reasons. Firstly, I don't believe Turkey will get involved, it's not the Turkish peoples conflict and the Turkish population doesn't want to get entangled into it. The major reason for me is that this was brought up but called off because Jordan and Egypt oppose the idea. Only Saudi Arabia wants to make this move. Jordan prefers Assad over Islamists in Syria, same with Israel and West. Jordan closed it's crossing completely after Nusra Front captured it from regime.

Saudi Arabia should do it, it will have all Arab Muslims behind it. If it occurs the West will panic.
Nusra didn't capture the crossing, FSA did. I know this isn't Turkey's conflict, but helping rebels out is within Turkey's interests because they will get a friendly government to the south that doesn't house and fund the PKK, and they won't have to fund the humanitarian crisis, which is already costing billions (albeit, Allah (swt) helped out Turkey with 40 billion in growth after they spent a few billion on us.)
 
Nusra didn't capture the crossing, FSA did. I know this isn't Turkey's conflict, but helping rebels out is within Turkey's interests because they will get a friendly government to the south that doesn't house and fund the PKK, and they won't have to fund the humanitarian crisis, which is already costing billions (albeit, Allah (swt) helped out Turkey with 40 billion in growth after they spent a few billion on us.)

I do hope Turkey and Saudi Arabia reconcilate in order to create benefit for Muslim world. They can turn the tide in Syria if they have political will to do so. The more tensions with Europe the more likely it will draw us closer. Also demonization of Muslims is ongoing around the world. You would think by now it would draw us closer together but still some elements in Muslim world are holding us back. Once we overcome this last obstacle than everything will become clear. Still very hard to achieve our goals but the threat then will be well understood and known by us. Right now there is confusion and complexity for most Muslims who can't connect pieces of puzzle. A rebel victory in Syria will enable them to do just that. And that's beginning of genuine change.
 
I do hope Turkey and Saudi Arabia reconcilate in order to create benefit for Muslim world. They can turn the tide in Syria if they have political will to do so. The more tensions with Europe the more likely it will draw us closer. Also demonization of Muslims is ongoing around the world. You would think by now it would draw us closer together but still some elements in Muslim world are holding us back. Once we overcome this last obstacle than everything will become clear. Still very hard to achieve our goals but the threat then will be well understood and known by us. Right now there is confusion and complexity for most Muslims who can't connect pieces of puzzle. A rebel victory in Syria will enable them to do just that. And that's beginning of genuine change.
The tide has already turned, the question is when the war will end. Elements holding us back in the "Muslim" world are mainly dictatorships & Iran and it's shiite army. If Hezbollah / Iran hadn't saved Bashar's *** in 2012 they would have been spared and Syria would be free by now. But it is good for us that they intervened, now we know that we won't be dealing with murderers, thiefs, and backstabbers in the future.
 
The tide has already turned, the question is when the war will end. Elements holding us back in the "Muslim" world are mainly dictatorships & Iran and it's shiite army. If Hezbollah / Iran hadn't saved Bashar's *** in 2012 they would have been spared and Syria would be free by now. But it is good for us that they intervened, now we know that we won't be dealing with murderers, thiefs, and backstabbers in the future.

I agree, it is Iran and allies holding us back. But also Arabs who share western mindset. Arabs that hope to bring us back to same political state we were in before Arab spring. That would mean all these lives went to waste. Now, once Arabs overcome Iranian obstacle. You are naive to believe West will allow for us free reign. The West threatens Arab nations against arming rebels with advanced weapons. They relay messages that they want war to prolong. Meaning they want the worst for us and oppose victory for us. Please begin to understand that, in other words it tide turns they will do everything diplomaticsly and politically to return it to stalemate. Howeverw, if they don't get what they want. You will see renewed hostility against us. Because they ultimaley oppose our self determination. Always was that way. And Russians and chineses also oppose our self determination. So you shouldn't sidestep or underestimate the real threat here. Iran is just the barrier that west uses to prevent what they fear most. So fall of Iran is actually bad thing for them and they know it. It's 'bad' because not being able to crush Muslim self determination efforts is considered bad thing to them. Because they're aggressors Christians and Jews and they will be dealt with in future, have no doubt. They took it way too far.
 
Elements holding us back in the "Muslim" world are mainly dictatorships

indeedy so... great was the rule of taliban, great is the rule of al-saud, great was the rule of zia ul haq, great is the rule of ikhwaan/qaeda in tripoli, great was the rule of khomenei, great was the rule of morsi, great is the rule of hamas.

oh, yea... off with the "dictator" and bring on the "democrat".
 
indeedy so... great was the rule of taliban, great is the rule of al-saud, great was the rule of zia ul haq, great is the rule of ikhwaan/qaeda in tripoli, great was the rule of khomenei, great was the rule of morsi, great is the rule of hamas.

oh, yea... off with the "dictator" and bring on the "democrat".

What about Ghadafi?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom