What's new

Stretched Afghan army seeks help from militias to defend Kunduz

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 28, 2010
22,931
45
29,058
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Stretched Afghan army seeks help from militias to defend Kunduz
REUTERS — UPDATED about 3 hours ago

555f464848ab0.jpg

“So far we have killed dozens of Taliban, and this is continuing,” said Mahbubullah, who like many Afghans uses only one name. ─ AFP/File
KUNDUZ: The Afghan government has enlisted hundreds of militia fighters controlled by local commanders to battle Taliban militants near the northern city of Kunduz, officials said, underlining how the armed forces are struggling to tackle the insurgency alone.

The recruitment of unofficial armed groups in Kunduz is on a larger scale than previous attempts by the government and Nato forces to recruit militias in the fight against the Taliban.

It may also signal a compromise of sorts for President Ashraf Ghani's administration, which had been trying to curb the influence of so-called “mujahideen” strongmen who held key positions in former President Hamid Karzai's government.

Ghani's spokesman, Ajmal Abidy, denied that the Kunduz recruitment amounted to re-arming mujahideen militias.

“What is being considered is selective voluntary citizens' participation in the defence of the country against terrorists,” he said in a statement.

The Taliban's weeks-long siege of Kunduz has involved thousands of militants and brought the insurgents closer to capturing a major city than at any time in years.

The scale of the assault and the inability of Afghan forces to repel it is particularly worrying, because it comes just a few months after Nato ended its combat mission in Afghanistan.

Western governments have spent more than $60 billion on getting Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) ready to secure the country once Nato troops withdrew.

Kunduz Governor Mohammad Omar Safi said that, as of this week, Taliban militants held positions on the city's outskirts and there were skirmishes daily. An operation to drive the insurgents out has been pending for two weeks.

Turning for help to so-called “mujahideen”, a loose term for fighters who resisted the Soviet occupation in the 1980s and the Taliban's hard-line regime the following decade, is an obvious solution for many in the government.

“ANSF are capable of providing security, but these people know the area better and they are more useful,” said Safi.

He told Reuters that about 1,000 fighters led by dozens of ex-mujahideen commanders had been recruited and given ammunition and money in recent weeks. Another 1,000 militiamen were on standby, he added.

The militias are backing an army and police presence that was as high as 12,000 in recent weeks, although it may be less now, according to military officials.

Read more: Nato, Afghanistan agree on future military-civilian mission

Risk of lawlessness
While calling on the support of former mujahideen groups may make sense in Kunduz, experts said it could backfire by entrenching militia commanders, some of whom have been accused of human rights abuses over recent decades.

Critics said historic rivalries between groups could also reignite, leading to more violence and lawlessness in Afghanistan.

“They (militia fighters) really answer to strongmen in the area and not to a standard, disciplined chain of command,” said Patti Gossman, an Afghanistan analyst for Human Rights Watch.

Afghanistan is led by a unity government headed by Ghani that came together after months of squabbling over election fraud.

Many mujahideen supported Ghani's election rival Abdullah Abdullah, who is now his chief executive, and during the political crisis some prominent commanders threatened to revolt against Kabul if their candidate was not named president.

Creating new layers of forces beyond the ANSF, which is made up of the army and national and local police, could mean more instability, said Thomas Ruttig of Afghanistan Analysts Network.

“At the moment, these militia commanders might support the government. But we don't know what they will do next week.”

Afghanistan's private militias were supposed to have been disbanded in the years after United States-backed military action toppled the Taliban in 2001, but many ex-mujahideen commanders retained arms and fighters.

In addition to mujahideen groups, both the US-led military coalition and Afghanistan's intelligence agency have fostered independent, localised “uprising” village defence units in areas plagued by the Taliban.

Human rights groups have documented abuses both by “uprising” units and mujahideen militias.

Read more: Bomb outside Afghan justice ministry kills five, wounds dozens

Seeking help
Kunduz governor Safi, though, said he was sure the government could keep fighters loyal, and that by recruiting militias, Kabul might in fact be able to control them better.

“A large number of them (mujahideen militias) were unhappy with the government, so we tried to bring them into an organized framework,” Safi said.

For militia fighters in Kunduz, the call to arms feels overdue; prominent mujahideen commanders have felt sidelined by Ghani's government.

“We have waited for a long time for the government to push back the insurgents, but it didn't happen,” said Masood Chardara, a former mujahideen commander who says he is leading 100 gunmen on the front lines in Talawka district on the city's outskirts.

“The government came forward and asked us to help them to root them (the Taliban) out. We had some old weapons, and the government gave us some new ones.” Another local ex-mujahideen, Mahbubullah, said his fighting force of several dozen men was proving effective in Kunduz.

“So far we have killed dozens of Taliban, and this is continuing,” said Mahbubullah, who like many Afghans uses only one name.
 
Indians have yet to do anything substantial for their friends in afghanistan , they have been left on their own and left to rely on militias
 
More militarization isn't the solution. The interests of these smaller armed groups may not align with the state in the long run. Taliban, ISIS, etc. formed under a similar short-sighted policy. In the long run, this is a recipe for balkanization.
 
Here we go again, producing another generation of militias because their army is not capable of defending the country.

Afghans you want to blame ISI for this too you idiots.

How long till the border is sealed? The spill over needs to stop.
 
Why not just increase the recruitment level of the ALP?
They are ALP.

The situation in Kunduz was different, prior to the Taliban attack there were local militias ( remnants of NA), bunch of thugs, supposedly pro-government that were at times doing more doming more harm to the security of the city then the Taliban. So basically the Afghan government delayed their response to the taliban attacks in order for these militias to be uprooted. Once these militias were removed the ANA took on the Taliban and destroyed them in a matter of 2 days.

In other words, the militias weakned by the Taliban, and then later the Taliban were destroyed by the ANSF. Enemy of my enemy is my friend!

Currently only those militias are armed which the government feels it has control over them and bring them under the ALP umbrella.
 
Even Pakistan army used tribal militias for assistance in the military operations in FATA.......but unlike Afghanistan, Pakistan army didnt rely on them or needed them that badly, some times they were thrown on front lines just to measure enemy's strength and used as shield for their own soldiers. Some times they were unleashed on Taliban when there was no military operation going on, to keep the enemy busy. They were disbanded when used, as in most cases they were organized by Political administration through FCR. Other than these fodder militias, there were/are pro-government aman Lashkars of tribes for defense of their own local area, approved by government. For example Mullagori tribe of Khyber, of entirely Bareilwi sect, has a tribal militia of more than 500 fighters to protect their area from Taliban.

Pakistan army employed 150,000 soldiers in small FATA, while ANA with slightly larger force is very stretched over area which is 20 times larger than FATA. So ANA has to rely on tribal militias whenever need arise.
 
O my.
More Militias to control militias :mad:
This is a BAD idea. Never worked for us. Infact back fired pretty badly.
Also i believe not working pretty well for Delhi as well. Read some reports about indian Government arming local population to fight againat Nexal rebels and it worsened the law and ordee situation. Indian Human Right Activists were getting berserk on the government to arm and train locals. I am missing the name of the female author here.
Any ways point is militia is a bad bad thing. It never works
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom