Old School
SENIOR MEMBER
State department is trying to turn a national defense tool such as F-16 into something like Adobe software with ridiculous EULA ! I am sure that Indians counted on this EULA and never expected PAF to get bold.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The first thing that needs to be addressed is how this 'US News' get a hold of a Diplomatic Document? Was it leaked?A TOP AMERICAN DIPLOMAT sent a written reprimand to the chiefs of the Pakistani air force in August accusing them of misusing U.S.-supplied F-16 fighter jets and jeopardizing their shared security, according to documents obtained by U.S. News.
So, this individual is basically a nobody now. And since it was drafted back in August, means its value no greater than Toilet Paper.A source who viewed the August letter, written by Andrea Thompson, then-undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs...
Thompson, who has since left government, warned the Pakistanis that their behavior risked allowing these weapons to fall into the hands of malign actors...
They themselves are confused about their own End-User Agreement. First they said that we couldn't use the Fighting Falcon for Strikes against another Nation and now the narrative appears that they can't be placed at other Bases. WTF!!!The State Department declined to respond to questions on the record. An official speaking on the condition of anonymity said the department as a matter of policy does not comment publicly "on the contents of bilateral agreements involving U.S. defense technologies, nor the communications we have about them."
Not to mention the release of Western Prisoners done through Islamabad.The agency in July – weeks before Thompson's letter – re-approved the terms for these monitors, known as Technical Security Teams, at a cost of $125 million.
I'm not sure if that's a compliment or insult."Given how volatile the situation was, it was important for both sides not to lose face in getting their plane shot down," says Karl Kaltenthaler, a professor at the University of Akron. "It makes sense that Pakistan would do that, but it was at the potential cost of getting called out by the U.S. for using the weapons platform that way. For the Pakistanis, this is how they operate."
Goota check it for fake news.Why are Pakistanis going nuts over bogus article quoting imaginary sources!!!
Look at the blogger's credentials for god sake! He is a self proclaimed security expert of some unkown website!


Any country which needs to depend on any other country for support, has scant chance of surviving. It is all about convergence of mutual interests. No one is a movie's villain nor a hero. We all have our own selfish interests at stake.Never depend upon Anericans.
Any Pakistani general or air marshal who advises to buy US weapons in future shud b shot for treason