What's new

South Korea Expects FTA With China By November

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 30, 2014
27,843
70
98,200
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
South Korea Expects FTA With China By November
by Mary Swire, Tax-News.com, Hong Kong


South Korea's Trade Minister Yoon Sang-jick has confirmed that the conclusion of a bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) with China can be expected this year, and, possibly, even before the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit due to begin on November 10 in Beijing, despite little progress on tariffs having been made in recent negotiating rounds.

He indicated that significant progress will be made in the FTA talks in the foreseeable future, as South Korea is willing to proceed quickly in wrapping up the terms of an agreement. Pressure for its conclusion is being seen following the meeting in July between South Korean President Park Geun-hye and her Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, who agreed in Seoul that their two countries would conclude an FTA by the end of 2014.

FTA negotiations started in May 2012, and the two countries have already decided to eliminate tariffs on 90 percent of all goods, and 85 percent of imports by value. Duties on non-sensitive products will be canceled either immediately or within ten years, and those on sensitive products will be abolished within 10-20 years after the FTA becomes effective.

However, the two sides have had little joy, so far, in trying to narrow their differences on ultra-sensitive items, for which longer-term tariffs of more than 20 years will have to be allowed, and there has been, as yet, no indication of the basis on which a final agreement can be reached.

There remain particular concerns in China regarding opening its manufacturing sector to South Korean imports, and in South Korea on the effect of Chinese imports on its agricultural markets. The South Korean Government has already had to reiterate that any deal would need to protect its food producers.

The 13th round of FTA talks is to be held before the end of this month, and it will be seen then whether the two Presidents' political pressure will provide the necessary impetus to motivate their trade ministers to deliver positive results.

According to Chinese Ministry of Commerce figures, total trade between South Korea and China reached over USD270bn in 2013, and the two leaders have set a USD300bn target for 2015. China is already South Korea's primary trading partner.

It is also still hoped that a final agreement could provide an added impetus to the talks on the proposed tripartite FTA between South Korea, China and Japan, and to the conclusion of the Chinese-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which is planned to bring the Association of Southeast Asian Nations' existing FTAs with China, South Korea, Japan, India, Australia, and New Zealand into a single improved agreement by the end of 2015.
 
This may have serious impact on taiwan.

Indeed. I guess the only remedy left for Taiwan is to sign the Trade in Services Agreement immediately. This is one area Taiwan still enjoys certain upper-hand.

Otherwise, Koreans will push out most of the traditional Taiwanese electronics.

Of course, if Taiwan unifies de jure with China, then, all the headache is gone and the sky is the limit.
 
I'd like to hear what South Koreans' opinion on this. Strange there aren't seem many SK members on this forum, none at all?
 
This FTA shows our government's confidence in the country's manufacturing sector, esp. in high-end electronics. 10 years ago, the government would never dare sign this deal, because domestic firms would get slaughtered by SK chaebols. Nowadays, Lenovo, Huawei, ZTE, etc, are all ready to slug it out and confident at staying on top.
 
Why should China sign FTA with Korea ? Korean market is too small, what can we gain from FTA ?
 
Why should China sign FTA with Korea ? Korean market is too small, what can we gain from FTA ?

An FTA is not wholly about economics. It is also about politics, thus, political economy. Greater integration means China has a solid regional basis. It does not really matter who sells more and who sells less to the other side so long as a healthy competition exists. Like Raphael says very sharply above, China is able to compete with Korean electronics and learn more from Korean auto makers.

Looking forward to hearing good news from CJK FTA.
 
An FTA is not wholly about economics. It is also about politics, thus, political economy. Greater integration means China has a solid regional basis. It does not really matter who sells more and who sells less to the other side so long as a healthy competition exists. Like Raphael says very sharply above, China is able to compete with Korean electronics and learn more from Korean auto makers.

Looking forward to hearing good news from CJK FTA.


You and I both know that's a lie.

China is Japan's top trading partner, but that doesn't seems to have positive effect on political relations.

And Korean firms are notorious in China, as I'm sure you are aware. Most of them are cons, they bribe local officals to get bank loan and free use of land, after that they will just run away and leave huge debts/unpaid wages behind. Just look at DaLian STX shipyards case.

China should alert korea's subtle infiltration.
 
You and I both know that's a lie.

China is Japan's top trading partner, but that doesn't seems to have positive effect on political relations.

And Korean firms are notorious in China, as I'm sure you are aware. Most of them are cons, they bribe local officals to get bank loan and free use of land, after that they will just run away and leave huge debts/unpaid wages behind. Just look at DaLian STX shipyards case.

China should alert korea's subtle infiltration.

I guess a well-structured FTA will address all those irregularities and improper behavior. It is often through the loopholes that profit-oriented companies misuses public trust. In one way or another, China has to do trade. Although I suspect an FTA craze with the West reminiscent of the TPP but, for the sake of regional integration and peace, I favor China to create its own economic sphere of influence.
 
You and I both know that's a lie.

China is Japan's top trading partner, but that doesn't seems to have positive effect on political relations.

And Korean firms are notorious in China, as I'm sure you are aware. Most of them are cons, they bribe local officals to get bank loan and free use of land, after that they will just run away and leave huge debts/unpaid wages behind. Just look at DaLian STX shipyards case.

China should alert korea's subtle infiltration.


Good points @tonyget . I like to see things at another angle, "Despite Japan and China's territorial issues, we are able to maintain the region's largest bilateral trade -- amounting at over $300 Billion per year, and growing."
 
@Nihonjin1051

I have heard that Japanese rank-and-file complaint about rising CPI and stagnant wages

Of course ! Standard of living, cost of living is ridiculously expensive in Japan!

I live in USA now and I can say without a reasonable doubt its way cheaper for me to live in USA than in Japan.

The only way I'll go back to Japan is if they offer me a good salary (higher than what they pay me here in USA).
 
Of course ! Standard of living, cost of living is ridiculously expensive in Japan!

I live in USA now and I can say without a reasonable doubt its way cheaper for me to live in USA than in Japan.

The only way I'll go back to Japan is if they offer me a good salary (higher than what they pay me here in USA).

I thought you said you can earn a lot with your degree in Japan, shouldn't be a problem then. I wonder how the average person can live in Japan when the cost of living is so high.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom