It's called, "locking the barn doors after the horse has escaped."I believe this is just a temporary show of force to reassure British people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's called, "locking the barn doors after the horse has escaped."I believe this is just a temporary show of force to reassure British people.
Lol yes, you can also call it like that.It's called, "locking the barn doors after the horse has escaped."
soldiers can't be used to fight isolated line wolf terrorists. Makes no sense. . Focus should be on better tracking them before they strike. Soldiers are of no use in this situationI agree. It is sad day to see this. I think it is way over the top and can't help but think May has done this with a eye on the elections where she wants to come acoss as tough on terrorism.I think it's an overreaction though.
i think its to show re assurance to the public that the "big guns" are out honestly it makes no sense as theres already armed police. and what cant the armed police do that army can?
has someone been reading the daily mail again?
Especially when I can find good pictures of events on the dailymail. Their articles are generous when it comes to pictures.True, I wonder why some European countries do this every time there's an attack. Soldiers can't take in police duties. Especially regarding such isolated lone wolf terrorist acts. It's not like we are in Syria or Iraq fighting against the caliphate state and it's soldiers(Raqaa, Mosul etc).I agree. It is sad day to see this. I think it is way over the top and can't help but think May has done this with a eye on the elections where she wants to come acoss as tough on terrorism.


more like bringing in the army because theres not enough armed police? if thats the case and word got out, its mr corbyn moving into number 10A bigger presence to help secure events and key sites or even freeing up police ressources to somewhere else. I suppose.
Spot on,again.Especially when I can find good pictures of events on the dailymail. Their articles are generous when it comes to pictures.

are you reading the daily mail or looking at the images of skimpy women in bikinis?![]()

hehe..lol, i dont need the images when you have the luxury of getting the real thing.Don't assume other people do what you are doing yourself.
No seriously,I never click on them,but they are devils with their clickbait titles and images.
What monitoring,kick them out,send them away.better monitoring of terror suspects and their radical Islamic hate preachers,
I agree. It is sad day to see this. I think it is way over the top and can't help but think May has done this with a eye on the elections where she wants to come acoss as tough on terrorism.
We are a democracy bro. Have to respect the rule of Law, despite its shortcomings.What monitoring,kick them out,send them away.
Children were killed,no mercy.
The UK is to soft to these radicals.
Even without the cuts , soldiers would still have been deployed. It's a political decision. France, Belgium did the same. Not sure if it was also because of cuts.@Blue Marlin @mike2000 is back
Police Federation: We wouldn’t need soldiers on the streets if the Government stopped police cuts
https://politicalscrapbook.net/2017...he-streets-if-government-stopped-police-cuts/

Well,i respect that but killing children is my red line,i have seen the picture of the eight year old girl who was killed,my niece is 7,you cant imagine what i would do if something like this would have happened to her.We are a democracy bro. Have to respect the rule of Law, despite its shortcomings.
Will never happen.wait until Corbyn becomes prime minister