Richard Hoolbroke himself said that he doesn't think India supports terrorism.India is involved however it is neither the only, nor the largest party involved in the Balochistan insurgency.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Richard Hoolbroke himself said that he doesn't think India supports terrorism.India is involved however it is neither the only, nor the largest party involved in the Balochistan insurgency.
We've been saying this for so many years. What's with the "right time" from Malik? If you have proof, show it. Or else, don't waste everyone's time in international arena.
The proof has already been shown, & if you listen to US Senate hearings, the MPs there have already admitted that India is involved in the destabilization of Balochistan through Afghanistan. I'll post you the video for it on this thread.
The proof has already been shown, & if you listen to US Senate hearings, the MPs there have already admitted that India is involved in the destabilization of Balochistan through Afghanistan. I'll post you the video for it on this thread.
Again, what proof do you have that those people you caught were Pakistanis?
Sirji it is not the problem of India that the evidence collecting is so complex. it is the problem of Pakistan. It has to brave them all and finally gives us the proof. Simply accusing us and then saying it is very difficult to collect evidnce due to so and so reasons is so awkward.
Benazir Bhutto, the PM of Pakistan, provided us the vital info on the movement of terrorists after initially supporting them and to this day many leaders of the BKI, KCF reside in Pakistan.
Intelligence reports that have been gathered by RAW,IB many of which were shared to Pakistan. Pakistan rejected those as usual. But the point is they were shared. But in this case even that is not the case. Not a shred of evidence has been presented till date to India.
You forget the tons and tons of dossiers sent ? Forgot David Headley, Forgot Ajmal Kasab ? C'mon.
Thats how it works, sure, but Pakistan is not working according to them.
1) If the Sikh fighters do reside in Pakistan then where is the proof ? It's not so easy being on the rough end is it ?
2) I have seen two of those dossiers, they have nothing but reference to daily use products found in the boat that were made in Pakistan, detergent, soap, toothpaste and of course those vague phone calls. If that's the best proof that RAW has been able to collect then I am not impressed, my aunt uses Indian ayurvedic medicine for her joint pains, so that means she is also sponsored by India ? Getting products of daily use is no big deal. Secondly, let's suppose Pakistan does not want to hand over the responsible, but the VoIP calls were being paid for from Italy, why can't RAW look that guy up and maybe he can spill the beans on ISI, i'm sure Italy will be more co-operative than us....
3) We never got to question Kassab, neither did we get to question Headley. And I don't know if you didn't
hear but I read it on this very forum from an Indian newspaper that Headley had retracted his statement and said that the ISI was not even aware of such an act..........
Shoving a link there doesn't make it incontrovertible PROOF of India's help to the Baluch. Period!Proofs of Indian involvement in Balochistan:
MPs told Russia, India and UAE involved in Baloch insurgency – The Express Tribune
Pasha said India has established nine training camps along the Afghan border, where they are training members of the Baloch Liberation Army. He also claimed “India and the UAE (reportedly due to opposition to construction of the Gwadar port) were funding and arming the Baloch. Pasha also claimed that the Russian government was directly involved in funding/training/supporting the insurgency.”


As I said the proof has been provided to Pakistan which rejected it as usual.. But in this case the first step of Providing proof to India " itself has not been done. Get the difference.
Google "Nawaz Sharif + Kasab + Geo", David Headley, etc. You just cant compare these two unless as I said, you catch red-handed an equivalent Amar Singh in Balochistan.
The phone intercepts of the terrorists and their handlers in Karachi has also been handed over to Pakistan.
That was way before. During the recent Chicago trials he just stopped short of indicting the whole ISI, though confessed the involvement of serving elements in the ISI (one Major Iqbal, Sajad Mir etc).
See all these cases are India providing the evidences to Pak which then Pak proceeded to reject. But Balochistan no one has sent eh proof except the watchful eyes of Rehman Malik.
As I said the proof has been provided to Pakistan which rejected it as usual.. But in this case the first step of Providing proof to India " itself has not been done. Get the difference.
Google "Nawaz Sharif + Kasab + Geo", David Headley, etc. You just cant compare these two unless as I said, you catch red-handed an equivalent Amar Singh in Balochistan.
See all these cases are India providing the evidences to Pak which then Pak proceeded to reject. But Balochistan no one has sent eh proof except the watchful eyes of Rehman Malik.