What's new

"SCO is about to admit India and Pakistan as full members"

@roadrunner
Seeing that you said that my posts are "as the lies you quote on the UN resolutions (re. Resolution on Assurances )", I will take that as a compliment because they are infact not lies. Any good book on UN resolutions and the assurance provided to India by the UNCIP before the first resolution was passed would show so.

You can't even post a credible link to the "UN resolution of Assurances". That's because it's a fictitious load of nonsense.

All the UN resolutions are available to read on the UN website. There is not one called the "Resolution of Assurances" on Kashmir.

And while I will leave you to be happy in the knowledge that northern areas is not part of the disputed region of Jammu Kashmir, please note that the rest of the world does not think so. From Lord Mountbatten who defined the J&K territory as bordering the Soviet republic to Emma Nicholson, the baroness in EU parliament that looks after the Kashmir affairs issue who has defined Gilgit Baltistan region as under Jammu Kashmir sovereignty, to the all weather friend China, all agree on the disputed nature of the territory.

a) they're not the rest of the world

b) Louis Mountbatten did NOT consider the Northern Areas as part of Kashmir. He considered Nagar-Hunza as a princely state that had a right to choose India or Pakistan at partition. It was only Gilgit that was questionable and the people of Gilgit are in no way Kashmiri (by language of culture).

c) China refutes reports of sending troops to Pakistan . There's a reference to Gilgit Baltistan as part of Northern Pakistan by the Chinese (if you believe it to be a controlled media). That makes your China assertion incorrect.

however, nevermind what "the whole world" says. you find this fictional treaty that granted the Maharajah the territory of Gilgit. It doesn't exist and you won't be able to find it. Kashmir's territory is legally laid out in the Resolutions of Lahore and the Resolutions of Amritsar. Gilgit was invaded and forced into paying tribute to Hari Singh. That does not make Gilgit part of Kashmir. The people of Gilgit do not even speak the Kashmiri language.

It is already known that most of the Northern Areas acceded to Pakistan and were considered as princely states in 1947. If most of the Northern Areas were an independent princely state at the time of partition, how can they have been part of Kashmir? Indian logic only could make this possible.
 
@Pakshah

ARe you even reading my posts or do you just read roadrunner's post and become satisfied?

Which Pakistani think tank you say?I posted a an entire paragraph from their website here http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...dia-pakistan-full-members-12.html#post1860718




The Xinhua article called NORTHERN PAKISTAN first, and then under Indian pressure changed that.

@roadrunner
Seeing that you said that my posts are "as the lies you quote on the UN resolutions (re. Resolution on Assurances )", I will take that as a compliment because they are infact not lies. Any good book on UN resolutions and the assurance provided to India by the UNCIP before the first resolution was passed would show so.

And while I will leave you to be happy in the knowledge that northern areas is not part of the disputed region of Jammu Kashmir, please note that the rest of the world does not think so. From Lord Mountbatten who defined the J&K territory as bordering the Soviet republic to Emma Nicholson, the baroness in EU parliament that looks after the Kashmir affairs issue who has defined Gilgit Baltistan region as under Jammu Kashmir sovereignty, to the all weather friend China, all agree on the disputed nature of the territory.






The Xinhua accepts Gilgit-Baltistan as a PROVINCE of Pakistan.
In other words Xinhua/China considers Gilgit-Baltistan to be Northern Pakistan.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-08/20/c_13454430.htm

Not only is Gilgit-Baltistan Northern Pakistan, but China considers Gilgit-Baltistan to be a province of Pakistan. China does not use the terminology of "disputed territory." If China consider's Gilgit-Baltistan to be a province of Pakistan, then Gilgit-Baltistan is Northern Pakistan.

Xinhua used "north Pakistan's Gilgit-Baltistan province?"

Nice try about your "beating around the bush."

You call the Pakistani website a Think Tank?
The Pakistani government just said "Historically", it never said "LEGALLY", because mahrajah conquered Gilgit-Baltistan by force.
That is why the Pakistani government included Gilgit-Baltistan.
WE DID NOT RECEIVE A UN RESOLUCTION AGANIST PAKISTAN INTEGRATING GILGIT-BALTISTAN.
BUT THERE WAS A UN RESOLUTION AGANIST INDIA TRYING TO INTEGRATE INDIAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR.
ASK ANYONE, THIS IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE!
You've been debunked so many times.
I beilieve in RR's posts because they make sense, unlike yours which are full of half-truths and complete lies. I do not only read his, also read your foolish posts.

My conclusions:
China and the Xinhua did not use "Disputed territory" for Gilgit-Baltistan or "Pakistani Occupied Kashmir."
THIS IN FACT SUPPORTS me and RR in stating Gilgit-Baltistan is NOT DISPUTED TERRITORY.
Don't believe me, search the Xinhua and don't be a baby!

In this Chinese foreign ministry article uses Gilgit-Baltistan in the same sentence with Khyber-Paktunkwa, which shows China recognizes Gilgit-Baltistan as an integral part of Pakistan and NOT DISPUTED TERRITORY. AND THAT YOU HAVE TAKEN ME AND RR FOR A LONG RIDE.
Here is the foreign ministry website:
http://pk.china-embassy.org/eng/zbgx/t723977.htm

The Xinhua does not consider Gilgit-Baltistan to be disputed territory, this should worry you EjazR!


LOL, I forgot to read RR's previous post about Xinhua using "Northern Pakistan", he really got you on that one EjazR.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom