roadrunner
SENIOR MEMBER
@roadrunner
Seeing that you said that my posts are "as the lies you quote on the UN resolutions (re. Resolution on Assurances )", I will take that as a compliment because they are infact not lies. Any good book on UN resolutions and the assurance provided to India by the UNCIP before the first resolution was passed would show so.
You can't even post a credible link to the "UN resolution of Assurances". That's because it's a fictitious load of nonsense.
All the UN resolutions are available to read on the UN website. There is not one called the "Resolution of Assurances" on Kashmir.
And while I will leave you to be happy in the knowledge that northern areas is not part of the disputed region of Jammu Kashmir, please note that the rest of the world does not think so. From Lord Mountbatten who defined the J&K territory as bordering the Soviet republic to Emma Nicholson, the baroness in EU parliament that looks after the Kashmir affairs issue who has defined Gilgit Baltistan region as under Jammu Kashmir sovereignty, to the all weather friend China, all agree on the disputed nature of the territory.
a) they're not the rest of the world
b) Louis Mountbatten did NOT consider the Northern Areas as part of Kashmir. He considered Nagar-Hunza as a princely state that had a right to choose India or Pakistan at partition. It was only Gilgit that was questionable and the people of Gilgit are in no way Kashmiri (by language of culture).
c) China refutes reports of sending troops to Pakistan . There's a reference to Gilgit Baltistan as part of Northern Pakistan by the Chinese (if you believe it to be a controlled media). That makes your China assertion incorrect.
however, nevermind what "the whole world" says. you find this fictional treaty that granted the Maharajah the territory of Gilgit. It doesn't exist and you won't be able to find it. Kashmir's territory is legally laid out in the Resolutions of Lahore and the Resolutions of Amritsar. Gilgit was invaded and forced into paying tribute to Hari Singh. That does not make Gilgit part of Kashmir. The people of Gilgit do not even speak the Kashmiri language.
It is already known that most of the Northern Areas acceded to Pakistan and were considered as princely states in 1947. If most of the Northern Areas were an independent princely state at the time of partition, how can they have been part of Kashmir? Indian logic only could make this possible.