What's new

Saudi TV presenter who was fired for not being pretty enough, sues channel

faisal6309

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 27, 2012
3,861
8
4,236
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Saudi TV presenter who was fired for not being pretty enough, sues channel

When she reported for work at the station office, her boss told her that she could not appear on TV because her looks were not good enough. ILLUSTRATION: JAMAL KHURSHID

RIYADH: A female Saudi television presenter has sued an Arab satellite channel for what she claims was discrimination and breach of contract after being fired on the first day of her job for not being deemed pretty enough to appear on screen, the Gulf News reported.

With a court in Riyadh due to hear the case, the woman claims that when she reported for work at the station, her boss told her that she could not appear on TV because her looks were not good enough.

The yet-to-be-identified presenter claims she had been contracted by the Arab satellite channel in Riyadh.

The presenter further alleged that the director had been rude to her, abused her verbally and categorically refused to allow her on screen.

She was, however, offered off-screen positions including work as a secretary or assistant to the news team, but the presenter refused them. The director then sacked her.

The presenter claimed that her contract did not stipulate a probationary period which would allow for her dismissal.

Last month, it was reported that female television presenters in Saudi Arabia had been told to cover up by wearing the traditional black abaya cloak, adds the Daily Mail.

Noora Al Adwan, a female member of the Shura Council, had demanded that a dress code be implemented for all Saudi women working in private television stations backed by Saudi Arabia.

She had proposed fines of up to SR10 million (£1.7m) for those who violate the code.

While the proposal was initially endorsed it was later withdrawn on because it had failed to define the national dress.

Saudi TV presenter who was fired for not being pretty enough, sues channel – The Express Tribune
 
At first place , why did they hire her ?? Their offering her secretary post after recruiting her as TV presenter is unethical and would have caused poor lady a lot of mental agony . I hope channel's director is lashed 100 times in full public view.
 
what hypocrisy is this?


lol, when did that happen?

Women in Saudi Arabia don't have to cover their faces. The wearing of niqab is more a social rule than a state imposed one. As with many rules, there are no rules set in place for the Islamic stuff like covering their face etc. as the state says this is a "social issue" meaning if the society tomorrow decides it is okay if women don't even wear a hijab then that's fine, that's what the society wants.

TV news presenters don't wear niqab. And anyone who doesn't want to Simply just won't to and no one can say a thing about it.

This is why there are no clear state laws on what constitutes an Islamic dress code. The religious police however try to impose whatever they want. Of course those days are long past of them roaming around like gods and now people simply depose the sight of those hell hounds.

What wtf ??

Isn't lashing minimum punishment in KSA ??

Lashing is not minimum punishment in Saudi Arabia, there is no clear guidelines to punishment because or law system is all over the place. One judge would sentence a man to 1 year for stealing the other will sentence the same man for the same crime 10 years and another will rule to cut off his hand. There are no guidelines and religious zealots like it that way.

The modernization of the law system with the new more secular courts coming into play made possible that law suits such as this one can pass and they gradually have drained the power from the religious courts. This is why King Salman sacked the minister of justice since he was part of the liberalization project that was allied with the Tuawijri . It's complicated .
 
Women in Saudi Arabia don't have to cover their faces. The wearing of niqab is more a social rule than a state imposed one. As with many rules, there are no rules set in place for the Islamic stuff like covering their face etc. as the state says this is a "social issue" meaning if the society tomorrow decides it is okay if women don't even wear a hijab then that's fine, that's what the society wants.

TV news presenters don't wear niqab. And anyone who doesn't want to Simply just won't to and no one can say a thing about it.

This is why there are no clear state laws on what constitutes an Islamic dress code. The religious police however try to impose whatever they want. Of course those days are long past of them roaming around like gods and now people simply depose the sight of those hell hounds.

That's what I was thinking. Behind a Niqaab with your face covered it wont matter whether you look like a supermodel or a hideous witch. So firing her for not being pretty was surprising.

However I have a doubt. there was an upraor a few days ago against a Saudi woman who showed her face in UAE television and some muftis said that since she is Saudi citizen it is not allowed or something. Please clarify that.
Saudi Cleric's Wife Shows Face on TV, Sparking Uproar
 
Women in Saudi Arabia don't have to cover their faces. The wearing of niqab is more a social rule than a state imposed one. As with many rules, there are no rules set in place for the Islamic stuff like covering their face etc. as the state says this is a "social issue" meaning if the society tomorrow decides it is okay if women don't even wear a hijab then that's fine, that's what the society wants.

TV news presenters don't wear niqab. And anyone who doesn't want to Simply just won't to and no one can say a thing about it.

This is why there are no clear state laws on what constitutes an Islamic dress code. The religious police however try to impose whatever they want. Of course those days are long past of them roaming around like gods and now people simply depose the sight of those hell hounds.
so the religious police are idiots?

Ok , then I guess either she be reinstated or be compensated with the amount she is asking.
better
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom