Saudi Foreign Ministry on Iran: We Don't Want War But Ready to Respond with Full Force

[WinterNights]

Saudi Arabia could declare full war and take action out of nowhere. targetting Iranian military installation within Iran

You camel jockeys can't fight your way out of a plastic bag. You're getting r@ped by the sandle wearing Houthis.
Iran would slaughter the saudis in a way that even Iranians would start feeling sorry for them. Even the Americans have practically admitted to this fact.

 

[War Historian]

Not only that the British threatened by dropping leaflets to bomb the Revza-I Mubarek in Medina if the Ottoman forces wouldn't leave the command to Sherif Hussein!!

On going regimes in gulf states are mostly grandsons of that time traitors, today's they are the Sheikhs, Emir and khalifas they feel their ancestors were more graceful and brave than the Gen.Fakhri Pasha.

 

[Numerous]

On going regimes in gulf states are mostly grandsons of that time traitors, today's they are the Sheikhs, Emir and khalifas they feel their ancestors were more graceful and brave than the Gen.Fakhri Pasha.

It was the Hashemites who sided with the British in the revolt. Then they were conquered by the saudis (who are the grandsons of that times people who conquered the traitors).

Not sure about the other royal houses.

But anyway what people's ancestor did does not pass the sin/crime unto the present day rulers. I mean it's been a 100 years.

 

[Malik Alpha]

The Saudis make for piss-poor soldiers, but excellent targets. Couldn't defeat a ragtag bunch of insurgents in Yemen, and now they speak of testing one of the most battle-tested armies in the ME. What a joke masquerading itself as a country, can't wait to see Makkah and Madinah liberated from these freaks.

Liberated by whom? These Rafidhi rats who dont even make 1 percent of the total Muslim population?

 

[War Historian]

It was the Hashemites who sided with the British in the revolt. Then they were conquered by the saudis (who are the grandsons of that times people who conquered the traitors).

Not sure about the other royal houses.

But anyway what people's ancestor did does not pass the sin/crime unto the present day rulers. I mean it's been a 100 years.

1. Grand father of MBS king abdul aziz who was ottoman traitor in najad who rise with the british help,then he killed thousands of sunni muslim in Makkah and Madina.the muslim who have only one crime they love islam and turks were killed brutally.Jannat ul Baqi and Jannat ul maula cemetery destroyed by them.
2. Hashimite kingdom of Jordan. king abdullah's grand father was also part of that traitor group who sided with British forces.
3. Emir Kuwait Al Sabah family follow the british instructions against turks.
Emirates different colonies Sheikhs who later gather a formed UAE.
All others arab states of ME are same vessel states of west from last 100 years.

 

[Numerous]

1. Grand father of MBS king abdul aziz who was ottoman traitor in najad who rise with the british help,then he killed thousands of sunni muslim in Makkah and Madina.the muslim who have only one crime they love islam and turks were killed brutally.Jannat ul Baqi and Jannat ul maula cemetery destroyed by them.
2. Hashimite kingdom of Jordan. king abdullah's grand father was also part of that traitor group who sided with British forces.
3. Emir Kuwait Al Sabah family follow the british instructions against turks.
Emirates different colonies Sheikhs who later gather a formed UAE.
All others arab states of ME are same vessel states of west from last 100 years.

I don't like MBS but was MBS involved in killing thousands around 90 years ago? He wasn't, so why does it matter?

The ottomans themselves killed 10,000s of Muslims in their initial conquest of Egypt from the mameluk. Muslim history is stained with blood shed.

Don't get me wrong, I like the ottomans and I like many of the Turks on this forum, they were once our shield and sword in the west. But being stuck in the past is ignoring what is going on in the present.

For example, just in the past 8 years, the Iranian regime has helped cause the deaths of 100,000s of Muslims. Doesn't this matter more bro?

 

[War Historian]

Sir, i already said in my first post in this thread.that iranian mullah gone mad.but on other side saud are also posing similar.iranian want to made shia al middle east and want to make everyone their vessel state.same goes to MBS.
If you remember every thing was fine under late King Abdullah govt.but suddenly king salman take overand MBS got the power and every thing shattered.

I don't like MBS but was MBS involved in killing thousands around 90 years ago? He wasn't, so why does it matter?

The ottomans themselves killed 10,000s of Muslims in their initial conquest of Egypt from the mameluk. Muslim history is stained with blood shed.

Don't get me wrong, I like the ottomans and I like many of the Turks on this forum, they were once our shield and sword in the west. But being stuck in the past is ignoring what is going on in the present.

For example, just in the past 8 years, the Iranian regime has helped cause the deaths of 100,000s of Muslims. Doesn't this matter more bro?

 

[Numerous]

Sir, i already said in my first post in this thread.that iranian mullah gone mad.but on other side saud are also posing similar.iranian want to made shia al middle east and want to make everyone their vessel state.same goes to MBS.
If you remember every thing was fine under late King Abdullah govt.but suddenly king salman take overand MBS got the power and every thing shattered.

Fair enough brother. You seem like a good guy.

 

[War Historian]

Fair enough brother. You seem like a good guy.

Thank you brother.Allah bless you with his favours

 

[-=virus=-]

ready to respond to a false flag event ?

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

It was the Hashemites who sided with the British in the revolt. Then they were conquered by the saudis (who are the grandsons of that times people who conquered the traitors).

Not sure about the other royal houses.

But anyway what people's ancestor did does not pass the sin/crime unto the present day rulers. I mean it's been a 100 years.

This is an old technique!! Get the job done by the B team, and then put forth your A team!! El Sauds were under the British intelligence office in Bombay...

On going regimes in gulf states are mostly grandsons of that time traitors, today's they are the Sheikhs, Emir and khalifas they feel their ancestors were more graceful and brave than the Gen.Fakhri Pasha.

Sherif Hussein could gather 400 to 500 criminal type Bedouin folks from the deserts and understood that it’d be a blunder to put them in charge!! So, he requested Fahrettin Pasha to provide security; otherwise, it’ll be a total plunder and mayhem. That the Arab folks revolted en masses against the Ottomans is a myth!!! Only few numbers of backward tribes could be bought off by the British!!

And, when ultimately they took over the wholesale massacre and looting that occurred is beyond description!! Those Jahil folks were told to burn all books except the Kuran-I Kerim!!! Those illiterate savages burnt the Kuran-I Kerim too for they couldn’t differentiate....

 

[War Historian]

This is an old technique!! Get the job done by the B team, and then put forth your A team!! El Sauds were under the British intelligence office in Bombay...


Sherif Hussein could gather 400 to 500 criminal type Bedouin folks from the deserts and understood that it’d be a blunder to put them in charge!! So, he requested Fahrettin Pasha to provide security; otherwise, it’ll be a total plunder and mayhem. That the Arab folks revolted en masses against the Ottomans is a myth!!! Only few numbers of backward tribes could be bought off by the British!!

And, when ultimately they took over the wholesale massacre and looting that occurred is beyond description!! Those Jahil folks were told to burn all books except the Kuran-I Kerim!!! Those illiterate savages burnt the Kuran-I Kerim too for they couldn’t differentiate....

Those al e saud even destroyed the Rouza e Ottman ghani, Fatima tul Zahra,and all cemetery of Sahaba e Rasool in madina and rouza e hazrat Khadija and many others in Makkah. They would never forgiven by the nature for their sins.
On the other hand Gen. Fakharudin Pasha resist 3 years against the traitors and British invaders in madina.
Arabs attack on the hijaz railway and killed thousands of pilgrims just because their camel convey business was disturb because of hijaz railway and they were no more able to looting and kidnapping the pilgrims.very shameful history of these arab state rulers.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Those al e saud even destroyed the Rouza e Ottman ghani, Fatima tul Zahra,and all cemetery of Sahaba e Rasool in madina and rouza e hazrat Khadija and many others in Makkah. They would never forgiven by the nature for their sins.
On the other hand Gen. Fakharudin Pasha resist 3 years against the traitors and British invaders in madina.
Arabs attack on the hijaz railway and killed thousands of pilgrims just because their camel convey business was disturb because of hijaz railway and they were no more able to looting and kidnapping the pilgrims.very shameful history of these arab state rulers.

Among them El Sani family from the current Katar were little more loyal and Sadik to the Ottomans. It is still reflected in their behavior...

 

[War Historian]

Yes Sir, and this Qatar ruling family still on the hit list of other arab states, because of their past and present behavior with Turks.

Among them El Sani family from the current Katar were little more loyal and Sadik to the Ottomans. It is still reflected in their behavior...

 

[B.K.N]

100 years ago their ancestors also put cannons near the Ka'ba( to destroy the Jabl e Umar fort of the ottomans in Makkah arab sets the british invaders cannon near Ka'ba to avoid the turkish retaliation,and turks never answer because of Ka'ba) . and after 100 years still muslims of the region having blood bath. Who is the responsible?? Sharif e Makkah hussain bin Ali, or Al e Saud, or some one else. We never learned, again repeating the power politics in Holy Land. this time player are Iranians against the sauds.
These iranian mullahs and Al e saud both are the curse for ummah.

What is wrong in revolting against foriegn occupiers with the help of some other country

The fought for their freedom