Satellite Imagery of SU-30s and SAMs Deployed In Srinagar and front line bases.

[Fawadqasim1]

if war breaks, Pakistan must destroy whole Srinagar Base through Army Strategic command actions. (cruise missiles or short range ballistic missiles)

Result:
* A huge loss of Enemy Su-30's
* Push back of enemy from Srinagar region.
* Loss of Enemy Air defense and newly equipped R-77-1 missiles
* Pakistan will be all Ready and ckear to attack Srinagar.

Why should we waste our precious limited cruise missiles inventory so early in a possibly long drawn war on tactical and replaceable targets?

 

[BVR]

MAR-1 is anti radiation missile used on JF-17 against any ground unit.
it's radar cant be jammed by enemy any how. and we have nearly hundred of them

 

[khansaheeb]

Before you guys rip me a new one for being an Indian, hear me out, many jingoistic posters here propose radical solutions without any thought about the real life consequences, I understand venting here online can be a healthy outlet, however toxic it can be but why do you underestimate your opponent to such an extent as to consider him to be a pushover ?

Please understand, after any major military action there will be a counter, case in point would be 26-27th Feb. This is a 70+ year perverse game of tit for tat, I'm under no illusion that there won't be a reaction from GoP, not these hare brained schemes though, but a well thought out response.

Because of thousand years of history? "why do you underestimate your opponent to such an extent as to consider him to be a pushover ?"

 

[Yaseen1]

if we not destroy them then they will attack our military installments and will cause damage to our assets

Yeh, as long you are happy to sacrifice your family when the war starts.

 

[BVR]

Why should we waste our precious limited cruise missiles inventory so early in a possible long drawn war on tactical and replaceable targets?

cruise missile costs less than one jf-17 and is more destructive, than taking risk of whole jf-17 squadron fighting in air against many enemy long bvr capable su 30s

 

[Fawadqasim1]

cruise missile costs less than one jf-17 and is more destructive, than taking risk of whole jf-17 squadron fighting in air against many enemy long bvr capable su 30s

Why should we risk a jft for such mission.

 

[BVR]

range of sd-10 is 80-100km
while r-77-1 is upto 120km

 

[Krptonite]

Because of thousand years of history? "why do you underestimate your opponent to such an extent as to consider him to be a pushover ?"

I have no doubt we have a rich shared history on this continent, but surely you must consider, in the face of ever changing scenarios and fast shifting world, historical events the further they are, the less they matter (practically)on present events.

 

[BVR]

Why should we risk a jft for such mission.

plz understand and read my post once more. im saying the samething.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

range of sd-10 is 80-100km
while r-77-1 is upto 120km

on paper yes in practice non of su30s could track either f 16 or jft from even 80 kms

 

[BVR]

better to take out the plant from roots at once than to start cutting it from top

on paper yes in practice non of su30s could track either f 16 or jft from even 80 kms

Because of clouds

 

[Fawadqasim1]

plz understand and read my post once more. im saying the samething.

There is even a cheaper and easily replaceable option available read my post No 26 of this thread.

 

[BVR]

There is even a cheaper and easily replaceable option available read my post No 26 of this thread.

nice

What about sending small china toy drones and waste their sam batteries,
like the idiots did to destroy our 7000rs drone with spyder missile in feburary

 

[Fawadqasim1]

nice

What about sending small china toy drones and waste their sam batteries,
like the idiots did to destroy our 7000rs drone with spyder missile in feburary

Those are all futuristic concepts used in Syria against Russians with very little to no success.

 

[BVR]

This could be a better option (toy f-16 with horrible speed) about 70$ or more only