What's new

Russsia not interested in taking Kashmir to UNSC

And despite that diplomatic failure, the UNSC has ignored Pakistan's begging to take action, and no country other than the Holy Trinity(China Turkey, and Malaysia) has condemned India. If that is a failure, I would hate to see what a victory looks like.


Do you even read what you type? By that logic, India also has interests in Pakistani Kashmir.
Is your village missing its idiot?

Do I deny that India has interests in Pakistani held territory? That's the whole point of India's worthless existence, to weasel every inch of mother Bharat from Pakistan it thinks it can. Of course India holds great interest in Pakistani held land. We love your obsessions with our tearaway Islamic Republic.

We hope India never changes its dreams and aspirations.

Now as for Pakistan being recognised as a legitimate stakeholder in the fate of Indian sovereign territory by numerous nations around the world including Indian "allies", to the point that Trump and others have repeatedly said BOTH India and Pakistan should sit down and sort it out, that must bug you in your little "internal matter" echo chamber.

Remember how annoyed your UN attache got at the mere suggestion that Kashmir isn't India's unilateral internal matter for jurisdiction.


This clown's chaddis are still burning.

Man, Pakistan is very happy at "bilateral" status as that means we

hold a stake. Nothing's changed.
 
Is your village missing its idiot?

Do I deny that India has interests in Pakistani held territory? That's the whole point of India's worthless existence, to weasel every inch of mother Bharat from Pakistan it thinks it can. Of course India holds great interest in Pakistani held land. We love your obsessions with our tearaway Islamic Republic.

We hope India never changes its dreams and aspirations.

Now as for Pakistan being recognised as a legitimate stakeholder in the fate of Indian sovereign territory by numerous nations around the world including Indian "allies", to the point that Trump and others have repeatedly said BOTH India and Pakistan should sit down and sort it out, that must bug you in your little "internal matter" echo chamber.

Remember how annoyed your UN attache got at the mere suggestion that Kashmir isn't India's unilateral internal matter for jurisdiction.


This clown's chaddis are still burning.

Man, Pakistan is very happy at "bilateral" status as that means we

hold a stake. Nothing's changed.
Well, I am glad you are happy. But your Prime Minister and Foreign Minister definitely don't seem happy. Every other day they complain about how the world is ignoring Kashmir due to their interests in India. Pakistani media outlets constantly post op-eds and editorials about how India is conducting human rights atrocities in Kashmir with the world's support. So it doesn't look like you are happy.

BTW, how did that latest UNSC meeting on Kashmir in December go for you?

And please tell me which countries condemned India for article 370 revocation and/or human rights violations? As i said before, neutrality benefits India. And most of the world has either been neutral or supported India.

Oh, in case you forgot, the last thing Trump said about Kashmir is that Modi has everything under control. And on that, it looks like Trump was right yet again.
 
Well, I am glad you are happy. But your Prime Minister and Foreign Minister definitely don't seem happy. Every other day they complain about how the world is ignoring Kashmir due to their interests in India. Pakistani media outlets constantly post op-eds and editorials about how India is conducting human rights atrocities in Kashmir with the world's support. So it doesn't look like you are happy.

BTW, how did that latest UNSC meeting on Kashmir in December go for you?

And please tell me which countries condemned India for article 370 revocation and/or human rights violations? As i said before, neutrality benefits India. And most of the world has either been neutral or supported India.

Oh, in case you forgot, the last thing Trump said about Kashmir is that Modi has everything under control. And on that, it looks like Trump was right yet again.

Mods please take a look at this illiterate clown, probably got deported from some airport in Europe or NA recently for faking proficiency in an English test.

Here is the full excerpt of Trump's commentary, including the follow-up statements.

"Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the G7 summit in France, Trump said: “We spoke last night about Kashmir. The Prime Minister [Modi] really feels he has it [Kashmir] under control.”

Trump said that he shares good relations with leaders of Pakistan and India.

“I am here... I have very good relationship with both of them but I think they can do it themselves,” the U.S. president said.

“They [India] speak with Pakistan and they will be able to do something [about Kashmir] that will be very good,” Trump added."

Now you half assed tea farming illiterate piece of yak excrement, where is Pakistan excluded in this full statement?

"I think they can do it themselves"

"...they will be able to do something..."

Wow - some severe endorsement of India's unilateral rights to have jurisdiction over its own sovereign territory there. Why the fk is it Imran Khan's business what you do in Kashmir? Why does Trump even mention that Khan should be party to sorting it out??

Face it k-pop boy, Hindustan cannot remove Pakistan from its Vedic equations unless it goes nuclear.

You change Muslim names to Vedic ones, you erase Mughal history from school texts, you break mosques and you eliminate Muslims, yet pakiland and its occupation of Indian territory and its desires on further Indian territory just won't ever go away - not in Pakistani minds or Trump's or Russia's minds...

You pathetic skinnies will need to muster up the courage to come over the border and silence us. We look forward to that day. Please send the lower castes and subservient tribal types like you first so we can get warmed up on you nepali and assamese cannon fodder - I mean, you don't actually have to ask Delhi for this favour - look at who has been getting blown up from Pulwama to the LOC duels - it's always you dumb fkers who enjoy returning home in multiple small body bags! I mean, why the subservience to the gujji brigade? Don't you teach these gujjis how your lot bravely resisted 4 or maybe even 5 fierce Mughal attacks before they gave up and left you to your little paddy fields? I thought gujjis knew how valuable your lot were throughout the heroic history of Hindu resistance to the Mughal invaders. Please remind me - was it 4 or was it 5 attacks repulsed?

Wow. What a glorious history. No need to erase Mughal history - just put the numbers up (4 or 5) next to the Mughal numbers and let the reader draw his conclusions.

If you insist on being a good little north easterner and servicing Delhi and the gujjis to the best of your abilities, then please, in future, post complete transcripts instead of edited or misinterpreted extracts. I cannot sit here all day correcting your misinformation.

"Oh, in case you forgot, the last thing Trump said about Kashmir is that Modi has everything under control. "

Trump ACTUALLY said "The Prime Minister [Modi] really feels he has it [Kashmir] under control.”

He didn't say Modi has it under control. He said Modi feels he has it under control.

Big difference, hence my questioning of your English proficiency.

Your erroneous and misleading statement infers that Trump relayed Trump's own opinion regarding the "control of the Kashmir situation". However the true statement infers that Trump relayed second hand information, something that was someone else's (I.e. Modi's) opinion.

Let me know if you're still struggling with this basic grammar.

And please don't misrepresent folks here with your poor interpretations of the English language.
 
Mods please take a look at this illiterate clown, probably got deported from some airport in Europe or NA recently for faking proficiency in an English test.

Here is the full excerpt of Trump's commentary, including the follow-up statements.

"Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the G7 summit in France, Trump said: “We spoke last night about Kashmir. The Prime Minister [Modi] really feels he has it [Kashmir] under control.”

Trump said that he shares good relations with leaders of Pakistan and India.

“I am here... I have very good relationship with both of them but I think they can do it themselves,” the U.S. president said.

“They [India] speak with Pakistan and they will be able to do something [about Kashmir] that will be very good,” Trump added.". The
Now you half assed tea farming illiterate piece of yak excrement, where is Pakistan excluded in this full statement?

"I think they can do it themselves"

"...they will be able to do something..."

Wow - some severe endorsement of India's unilateral rights to have jurisdiction over its own sovereign territory there. Why the fk is it Imran Khan's business what you do in Kashmir? Why does Trump even mention that Khan should be party to sorting it out??

Face it k-pop boy, Hindustan cannot remove Pakistan from its Vedic equations unless it goes nuclear.

You change Muslim names to Vedic ones, you erase Mughal history from school texts, you break mosques and you eliminate Muslims, yet pakiland and its occupation of Indian territory and its desires on further Indian territory just won't ever go away - not in Pakistani minds or Trump's or Russia's minds...

You pathetic skinnies will need to muster up the courage to come over the border and silence us. We look forward to that day. Please send the lower castes and subservient tribal types like you first so we can get warmed up on you nepali and assamese cannon fodder - I mean, you don't actually have to ask Delhi for this favour - look at who has been getting blown up from Pulwama to the LOC duels - it's always you dumb fkers who enjoy returning home in multiple small body bags! I mean, why the subservience to the gujji brigade? Don't you teach these gujjis how your lot bravely resisted 4 or maybe even 5 fierce Mughal attacks before they gave up and left you to your little paddy fields? I thought gujjis knew how valuable your lot were throughout the heroic history of Hindu resistance to the Mughal invaders. Please remind me - was it 4 or was it 5 attacks repulsed?

Wow. What a glorious history. No need to erase Mughal history - just put the numbers up (4 or 5) next to the Mughal numbers and let the reader draw his conclusions.

If you insist on being a good little north easterner and servicing Delhi and the gujjis to the best of your abilities, then please, in future, post complete transcripts instead of edited or misinterpreted extracts. I cannot sit here all day correcting your misinformation.
Since Pulwama, only 24 security personnel have been killed in Kashmir due to millitant attacks. That is less then the casualties Pakistan has suffered in Balochistan and KP, for the sake of comparison. As a whole, the number of casualties India has sufferd from terrorism has fallen in 2019, and is much lower than the casualties Pakistan suffered.
https://satp.org/datasheet-terrorist-attack/fatalities/india

And since you care so much about the northeast, you should know the Mughals were never able to cross the Brahmaputra due to the Ahom Empire. And we all know how when the British came to India, the Mughals were nothing but a puppet kingdom limited to Delhi, while the Marathas and Sikhs ruled most of the subcontinent..
 
Since Pulwama, only 24 security personnel have been killed in Kashmir due to millitant attacks. That is less then the casualties Pakistan has suffered in Balochistan and KP, for the sake of comparison. As a whole, the number of casualties India has sufferd from terrorism has fallen in 2019, and is much lower than the casualties Pakistan suffered.
https://satp.org/datasheet-terrorist-attack/fatalities/india

And since you care so much about the northeast, you should know the Mughals were never able to cross the Brahmaputra due to the Ahom Empire. And we all know how when the British came to India, the Mughals were nothing but a puppet kingdom limited to Delhi, while the Marathas and Sikhs ruled most of the subcontinent..
You should personally lead the charge Mr brave ahom. This would give the new mughals the excuse to counter attack the north east of India and liberate several paddy fields and an ox or two.

No fkin wonder nobody ever wasted any time up there.

" As a whole, the number of casualties India has sufferd from terrorism has fallen in 2019"

Shall we correlate this with all the mysterious "accidental" deaths that conveniently occur within a couple of days of Pakistani artillery fire? Might give us a truer figure don't you think?

I mean wow. Seriously. India fakes figures left, right and centre....and here you are trying to convince me?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-accused-of-overstating-its-growth-statistics

Maybe YOU should question your government. Then again, if anyone questions Bhaktistan, they get labelled as traitors. Whadda sham of a country you represent.
 
You should personally lead the charge Mr brave ahom. This would give the new mughals the excuse to counter attack the north east of India and liberate several paddy fields and an ox or two.

No fkin wonder nobody ever wasted any time up there.

" As a whole, the number of casualties India has sufferd from terrorism has fallen in 2019"

Shall we correlate this with all the mysterious "accidental" deaths that conveniently occur within a couple of days of Pakistani artillery fire? Might give us a truer figure don't you think?

The Mughals did make several attempts to cross the Brahmaputra, which were all eventually repulsed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahom–Mughal_conflicts
 
Fair play. Credit where due. You should build a monument for each Mughal assault repulsed.

Won't take too long.
There are several monuments of Ahom kings who repulsed the Mughals. For examaple, this is a statue of Lachit Barphukan in Jorhat

220px-Lachit_Barphukan%27s_maidam2.JPG
 
Russia has been consistent in saying Kashmir is an issue between India and Pakistan not involve UNSC.
Also they said removal of Art 370 is India's internal matter. Confused??


Ambassadors represent their country. Russian ambassador's job is not to explain India's foreign policy. Besides if that's India's opinion, why don't you ask Russian ambassador to Pakistan to make a different statement?
Even if Kashmir is a "dispute" it doesn't mean anything if the UNSC doesn't get involved. So by preventing Kashmir from going to the UNSC, Russia is openly supporting India while sounding neutral. A smart move overall.
 
Including some countries which pak considers as it's allies
Even China doesn't really care. the recent talks on between Wang Yi and Ajit Doval on the boundary issue is proof. Once India and China finally settle the border, China will have no reason to support Pakistan on Kashmir.
 
the UNSC was formed to deal with what the UNSC considers important. And obviously, the UNSC doesn't consider Kashmir as important as Pakistan does, given the fact it refused to meet on Kashmir last month.

That is exactly what happens when you are zombie of your terrorist army and propaganda media.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom