What's new

Russsia not interested in taking Kashmir to UNSC

Minho

BANNED
Aug 2, 2019
601
-1
371
Country
India
Location
India

interview of Russian Ambassador to India. Position on Kashmir clarified around 0:30
 

interview of Russian Ambassador to India. Position on Kashmir clarified around 0:30
I thought they would say Kashmir is an internal issue India and Pakistan should not meddle in India's matters... So, does this mean its not India's internal matter that even India's closest ally is not standing with Union of India's position?
 
I thought they would say Kashmir is an internal issue India and Pakistan should not meddle in India's matters... So, does this mean its not India's internal matter that even India's closest ally is not standing with Union of India's position?
Russia has been consistent in saying Kashmir is an issue between India and Pakistan not involve UNSC.
Also they said removal of Art 370 is India's internal matter. Confused??

What do you expect "indian ambassador" from Russia to say instead?
Do you know what's the job of state ambassadors?
Ambassadors represent their country. Russian ambassador's job is not to explain India's foreign policy. Besides if that's India's opinion, why don't you ask Russian ambassador to Pakistan to make a different statement?
 
So Russia does not support India's position that Kashmir is India's internal issue by calling it a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan?
an issue between India and Pakistan not involve UNSC.
Also they said removal of Art 370 is India's internal matter. Confused??
I am just trying to know how many India's allies stand with India's narrative?
 
So Russia does not support India's position that Kashmir is India's internal issue by calling it a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan?
I don't think repeating what you said before would be helpful. Even India says Kashmir is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.

I am just trying to know how many India's allies stand with India's narrative?
All of them. What changed?
 
Ambassadors represent their country. Russian ambassador's job is not to explain India's foreign policy. Besides if that's India's opinion, why don't you ask Russian ambassador to Pakistan to make a different statement?

The ambassador to India is responsible for keeping his ties with India fine while catering to the local media.
Just like American presidents in the past have gone to India and said what pleases India and then come to Pakistan and said what pleases Pakistan.

I don't think repeating what you said before would be helpful. Even India says Kashmir is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.


lol you might to ask Modi and Amit shah and refer to their speeches and media thingies from the last year.
 
The ambassador to India is responsible for keeping his ties with India fine while catering to the local media.
Just like American presidents in the past have gone to India and said what pleases India and then come to Pakistan and said what pleases Pakistan.
Like I said, Russian ambassador represents Russia in India. Russian has always maintained Kashmir is a bilateral issue. Why are you uneasy now? Don't you remember when art 370 was removed, an emergency closed door meeting convened and Russian rep to UN made the same comment. So did the French.

lol you might to ask Modi and Amit shah and refer to their speeches and media thingies from the last year.
lol yourself. Where did Modi and Shah said dispute with Pakistan is internal issue? They have only maintained the art 370 issue is strictly internal.
 
I don't think repeating what you said before would be helpful. Even India says Kashmir is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.


[

Kashmir is a dispute between India and Pakistan, where India is illegitimate occupier holding the region at gun point, the situation is worse when there is a Hindutva terrorist holding top positions in artificial republic of India, some positions to include, prime Minister, army chief, defence minister, etc.

The United nations was created to solve world wide humanitarian and territorial disputes to minimize the risk of war. So with what logic Russia, India or any other retard says it is not a matter for UNSC?

The UN must be disbanded then. If it continuously avoid and shies away from the responsibilities given to it. Both world's longest disputes such as Kashmir and Palestine are black dot on the face of United nations.
 
Kashmir is a dispute between India and Pakistan, where India is illegitimate occupier holding the region at gun point, the situation is worse when there is a Hindutva terrorist holding top positions in artificial republic of India, some positions to include, prime Minister, army chief, defence minister, etc.

The United nations was created to solve world wide humanitarian and territorial disputes to minimize the risk of war. So with what logic Russia, India or any other retard says it is not a matter for UNSC?

The UN must be disbanded then. If it continuously avoid and shies away from the responsibilities given to it. Both world's longest disputes such as Kashmir and Palestine are black dot on the face of United nations.
UN doesn't run to fulfill Pakistan's bucket list.
 
So Russia does not support India's position that Kashmir is India's internal issue by calling it a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan?

I am just trying to know how many India's allies stand with India's narrative?
In a previous interview, He has said that article 370 is an internal matter pertaining to India's constitution.


So Russia does not support India's position that Kashmir is India's internal issue by calling it a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan?

I am just trying to know how many India's allies stand with India's narrative?
The ambassador to India is responsible for keeping his ties with India fine while catering to the local media.
Just like American presidents in the past have gone to India and said what pleases India and then come to Pakistan and said what pleases Pakistan.




lol you might to ask Modi and Amit shah and refer to their speeches and media thingies from the last year.
If that's the case why hasn't the Chinese Ambassador said Kashmir is an internal matter of India? Because China actually needs to improve ties with India more then ever because of the pressure it is under due to the trade war. Russia has also been consistent in saying it doesn't think Kashmir should be discussed at the UNSC. BTW India is fine with solving the dispute under Shimla and Lahore, it is Pakistan that said the Article 370 revocation nullified those documents. Pakistan has also been saying Kashmir is not a bilateral dispute between two countries but an international dispute necessitating UN intervention like Syria or Rohingyas. So even statements saying Kashmir is a bilateral dispute(which most countries have said) goes against Pakistan's claims.

I am just trying to know how many India's allies stand with India's narrative?

Only three countries have openly condemned India for Article 370. Those are Turkey, Malaysia, and China. Most countries have been neutral on the Kashmir issue, which is good enough for India. The countries that have said Article 370 and/or Kashmir in general include:

Russia
Sri Lanka
Maldives
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Serbia
UAE

The US has also said it considers Article 370 an internal matter, but the US is divided between the federal government which supports India and the Democratic-controlled Congress which opposes India. In general the US has supported India on Kashmir. The Undersecretary of State for South Asia even said the US supports India's objectives behind repealing Articel 370.
 
So even statements saying Kashmir is a bilateral dispute(which most countries have said) goes against Pakistan's claims.
Bilateral or international is fine. We can justifiably nuke you either way. India wants it to be an "internal" matter only. Nobody has consistently supported this position. Nobody. Not even Russia.

Why does India tolerate it being described as "bilateral" at all? Are you not embarrassed by this diplomatic failure?

Is Balochistan ever described as a bilateral matter between Pakistan and anyone?

Pakistan owns nearly half on Indian claimed Kashmir and apparently has confirmed bilateral interest in the remaining part of Kashmir.

How do you keep a straight face over that?
 
We have sort lived memories. Don't forget that it was Russia who overtly armed India to the teeth since 1947, facilitated the break up of Pakistan through military and diplomatic means in 1971 and created the Afghanistan problem. The list is too long to be placed in this forum.
Russians are godless wild wolves who can never be trusted.
 
Bilateral or international is fine. We can justifiably nuke you either way. India wants it to be an "internal" matter only. Nobody has consistently supported this position. Nobody. Not even Russia.

Why does India tolerate it being described as "bilateral" at all? Are you not embarrassed by this diplomatic failure?

Is Balochistan ever described as a bilateral matter between Pakistan and anyone?

Pakistan owns nearly half on Indian claimed Kashmir and apparently has confirmed bilateral interest in the remaining part of Kashmir.

How do you keep a straight face over that?
And despite that diplomatic failure, the UNSC has ignored Pakistan's begging to take action, and no country other than the Holy Trinity(China Turkey, and Malaysia) has condemned India. If that is a failure, I would hate to see what a victory looks like.

Pakistan owns nearly half on Indian claimed Kashmir and apparently has confirmed bilateral interest in the remaining part of Kashmir.
Do you even read what you type? By that logic, India also has interests in Pakistani Kashmir.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom