Rohingyas should be citizens or be given their own state: Mahathir

[Riyaz Syed]

If India wasn't able to impose it's will against Pakistan, you wouldn't have a country today.

You are a liar.
Bangladeshis freed themselves. Indian army came in just for paper signing ceremony.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

You are a liar.
Bangladeshis freed themselves. Indian army came in just for paper signing ceremony.

Those 90,000 didn't surrender to Bangladeshis. They surrendered to the Indian army.

 

[911]

Yep they used to be in Northern Arakhan before they were ethnically cleansed in 2017.

BD needs to annex the land.

If that ever happens then you take all Rohingyas?

 

[Riyaz Syed]

Those 90,000 didn't surrender to Bangladeshis. They surrendered to the Indian army.

That is false indian version. They surrendered to Bangladeshis and Indian army took the credit

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

That is false indian version. They surrendered to Bangladeshis and Indian army took the credit

Accha ji.

 

[UKBengali]

If that ever happens then you take all Rohingyas?

Yes ALL of them anywhere in the world will be absorbed by BD.
It is a very fair trade-off.

 

[fallstuff]

If India wasn't able to impose it's will against Pakistan, you wouldn't have a country today.

Certainly disagree on this one as West Pakistan was in no position to conduct sustained military operation 1000 miles away.

 

[zartosht]

whats the Rohingya situation now?? all accounts say they were wiped out of Myanmar and all are living in Bangladesh?

anybody know how many rohingyas approximately left in Myanmar?

Myanmar got away with a genocide. they seem to have gotten everything they wanted. ethnicly cleanse the Rohingya (who they consider Bangladeshi illegal migrants) back into Bangladesh. and weather the international criticism..

now just sit back and wait. each day that passes is another day where a Rohingya is not born in Myanmar, another day where a Rohingya is away from his former home, and another day for the Rohingya community to set roots in Bangladesh and make it their new homes..

if the Rohingya don't go back to their homes soon, the lands they occupied will probably get settled by buddists and be lost forever.

 

[El Sidd]

PDF should have flags of the Rakhine State as a gesture to honor Malaysian Prime Minister.

@Riyad can volunteer i safely assume

 

[Al-zakir]

Yep they used to be in Northern Arakhan before they were ethnically cleansed in 2017.

BD needs to annex the land.

Bd may become rich but it is going to be a nation of cowards if current trends continue. Write it down for future reference.

 

[dray / Rain Man]

Rohingyastan? Seems like internet hindus are fond of inventing mythical country name by mixing gao mutra with gobar ka halua in their brain very often.

All these we dump into the rivers flowing into Bangladesh for nourishment of the hapless people of that teeny weeny country.

 

[dray / Rain Man]

Dudette...

How is pushing more than 1.1 million of your Rohingya population into BD an "internal matter"?

BD will simply impose the settlement that is favourable to it on the savages in the end.

Tiny countries cannot wage war against a much larger country.

Myanmar will be totally destroyed if it does not accept BD annexation of Northern Arakhan.

Just because you Indians cannot impose your will against seven times smaller Pakistan does not mean that BD will also be failure like you against Myanmar.

I left the Bangladeshis as delusional bunch, came back after a year or two, and now they are a super delusional bunch!!

You are a liar.
Bangladeshis freed themselves. Indian army came in just for paper signing ceremony.

That is false indian version. They surrendered to Bangladeshis and Indian army took the credit

Are you trolling, a false-flagger Bangladeshi, or just got hold of a load of fine Yaba that Rohingyas supply to the Bangladeshis?

Certainly disagree on this one as West Pakistan was in no position to conduct sustained military operation 1000 miles away.

Unless blocked by India, West Pakistan was very much in position to crush any Bangladeshi resistance. And without India's role in building, training, funding, arming the Mukti Bahini, West Pakistan wouldn't even needed a sustained military operation. Your freedom is our gift, enjoy it.

 

[Nilgiri]

Are you trolling

Yup, he's trolling sarcastically. He really got into it with some BD members here about their stupid statements earlier

 

[fallstuff]

Unless blocked by India, West Pakistan was very much in position to crush any Bangladeshi resistance. And without India's role in building, training, funding, arming the Mukti Bahini, West Pakistan wouldn't even needed a sustained military operation. Your freedom is our gift, enjoy it.

India could not even fight LTTE which India funded, trained, and armed. IPKR had 70,000 soldiers in northern Sri-Lanka which is a much smaller geography then Bangladesh, yet it failed miserably.
Actually India trained mostly Mujib bahini, which almost never took part in actual warfare. This Mujib Bahini later became much hated "Rokhi Bahini" following independence.
India did provide small arms, some training, and shelter to a few million people.
The East Bengal Regiment put up fight especially in the Chittagong area with their own weapons starting from the early days. They lost 1,000s of their own, but they fought as they were trained to do. Most fighting were done by the these military folks and the young men from the rural areas.

Read this book, written by a freedom fighter. This man has a Ph.D and taught at University in USA.

 

[dray / Rain Man]

India could not even fight LTTE which India funded, trained, and armed. IPKR had 70,000 soldiers in northern Sri-Lanka which is a much smaller geography then Bangladesh, yet it failed miserably.
Actually India trained mostly Mujib bahini, which almost never took part in actual warfare. This Mujib Bahini later became much hated "Rokhi Bahini" following independence.
India did provide small arms, some training, and shelter to a few million people.
The East Bengal Regiment put up fight especially in the Chittagong area with their own weapons starting from the early days. They lost 1,000s of their own, but they fought as they were trained to do. Most fighting were done by the these military folks and the young men from the rural areas.

Read this book, written by a freedom fighter. This man has a Ph.D and taught at University in USA.

People with shallow knowledge end up making such ludicrous assumptions. It was not that "India couldn't fight LTTE", the fact is that India never wanted to fight LTTE, they are Tamil people! India sent a "Peace keeping force" there, which was a stupid step by Rajiv Gandhi, but their aim was not to fight the LTTE, only due to some wrong turn of events they ended up engaging in skirmishes with the LTTE, that resulted in huge protest back in India, and the peace keeping forces were withdrawn. If India wanted war on LTTE, then there would have been only one outcome.

About Bangladesh war, even after India completely cutting off West Pakistan's supplies and reinforcements from reaching Bangladesh for nine long months, and with all the training and support provided by India, the Mukti Bahini was proved to be inadequate to fight back the Pakistani army and Bangladeshi rajakars, not all Bangladeshis were looking for freedom from West Pakistan! India was compelled to intervene because Mukti Bahini was cornered in certain pockets and was running out of options. Those people fought bravely, this I give it to them, but it would be extremely ungrateful for the Bangladeshis to ignore or deny the huge contribution of India in creation of their country before, during, and after the war, no other country in the history of the world did so much for another country. But then, it seems that ungratefulness is in the nature of the Bangladeshi people, maybe Pakistani leadership was not quite off the mark with their assessment of Bangladeshi people, as it appears now.