BelligerentPacifist
SENIOR MEMBER
I want freedom of murder. People are going to die anyway, better have some fun while dispatching them to their deaths. I want cannibalism to be approved by the constitution too. I shall therefore be moving to India.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Even if we Revoke the Blasphemy Law, its wont bring any change except for more target killing of our politicians ( IMO one of the reason they are not revoking the Laws)
Bring all the forces and people together and finish all talibans, that's the only solution
The matter of fact is that Blasphemy law is protecting People. People are trailed in the court and proper justice is provided by the free judiciary.
Before this law , people (having allegations) were killed at the spot.
*
Secondly , this law was introduced by Z A Bhutto.
Mr. Zia only injected the law into the constitution.
Thanks
I want freedom of murder. People are going to die anyway, better have some fun while dispatching them to their deaths. I want cannibalism to be approved by the constitution too. I shall therefore be moving to India.

Secondly , this law was introduced by Z A Bhutto.
Mr. Zia only injected the law into the constitution.
Thanks
The law enacted by the British was general in nature, prescribing punishments for intentionally destroying or defiling a place or an object of worship or disturbing a religious assembly. They also make it unlawful to trespass on burial grounds or insult religious beliefs through the spoken or written word or by innuendo or visible representation. The maximum punishment under these laws ranges from one year to 10 years in jail, with or without fine.
The blasphemy laws were created and expanded in several instalments. In 1980, a clause was added to the law, making derogatory remarks against Islamic personages an offence, carrying a maximum punishment of three years in jail. In 1982, another clause prescribed life imprisonment for "wilful" desecration of the Koran, the Muslim holy book. In 1986, a separate clause was inserted to punish blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad and the penalty recommended was "death, or imprisonment for life", in that order.
A large majority of Pakistani people support the idea that blasphemers should be punished, but there is little understanding of what the religious scripture says as opposed to how the modern-day law is codified. The response to recent events suggests that they largely believe the law, as codified by the military regime of General Zia-ul Haq back in the 1980s, is in fact straight out of the Koran and therefore is not man-made. The organised religious groups are promoting this view and have been able to mobilise mass support in their favour. Their highest point came when the assassin of Governor Salman Taseer was hailed as a hero by a large section of people across the country.
The matter of fact is that Blasphemy law is protecting People. People are trailed in the court and proper justice is provided by the free judiciary.[/B]
Before this law , people (having allegations) were killed at the spot.
is in fact straight out of the Koran and therefore is not man-made.
In the end, when all is said and done and it's time for action - either they are Muslims or we are, either they have a monopoly on coercion or we do -- See, friends the politicians and the state, the judiciary, these are all useless - because they have no way to confront the Islamicans - while these will sit on their thumbs, the Islamicans will go from strength to strength and the people will be exhausted (they are just people, just flesh and blood)
It's only when the one way traffic of violence is reveresed that the Pakistani nation will have any chance of saving itself.
You guys can keep whining and debating as much and long as you want, But the blasphemy law itsn't going anywhere.