What's new

Refugee issue in ancient India

700 years back a SINGLE MUSLIM was given refuge in Kashmir.
Now, the Hindus of Kashmir are refugees else where.

When you fail to learn from history - you are bound to go extinct like Kashmiri Hindus.
sorry you are welcome to be perennially afraid of muslims.. am not... and I cant blame the kashmir demography on that single muslim... most kashmir muslims are local converts am sure, not foreigners.
 
sorry you are welcome to be perennially afraid of muslims.. am not... and I cant blame the kashmir demography on that single muslim... most kashmir muslims are local converts am sure, not foreigners.

Was the first one a local muslim as well?
Do you think Kashmir is a isolated case?

Are u aware of percentage of Hindus in Pakistan & Bangladesh n 1947 and now?

At what point are we going to admit the truth to ourselves?
 
Was the first one a local muslim as well?
Do you think Kashmir is a isolated case?

Are u aware of percentage of Hindus in Pakistan & Bangladesh n 1947 and now?

At what point are we going to admit the truth to ourselves?
are you ignoring the partition which saw large scale displacement? what about percentage of buddists that rapidsly declined compared to hindus.
if the kashmiris converted to islam they still remain kashmiri, i fail to see how a foreigner took over kashmir after being allowed in.
 
interesting debate... thanks for sharing..
on rohingyas.. am not saying we should do it for tradition, we should do it for human rights. humanity has moves forward a lot since alexander's invasion, we are all have higher moral standards and we live in a much gentle time. Just to compare no govt in India will bring back chopping off hands(normal in Ashoka's time, whose moral values we admire)...
Govt of India won't bring back chopping off hands but ask Mullahs who are in aggressively demanding Rohingyas must be allowed to stay in India about their desire for Sharia law?
 
Govt of India won't bring back chopping off hands but ask Mullahs who are in aggressively demanding Rohingyas must be allowed to stay in India about their desire for Sharia law?
mullahs are immaterial to this debate.. we should judge the case based on its own merit not on what sanghis have nightmare of or mullah led show of strength in kolkata.
this is a human right issue, we got a fraction of refugees of what bd got... we can let them live till situation improves while putting political pressure on myanmar.
we are not accepting sharia law.. case closed.
 
mullahs are immaterial to this debate.. we should judge the case based on its own merit not on what sanghis have nightmare of or mullah led show of strength in kolkata.
we are not accepting sharia law.. case closed.
Nightmare of mullah led show? Such creatures shout loud while issuing threats and cry even louder once taken to task. We have enough of them and we don't need more. Case closed. You can join them in their collective breast beating over "humanity" no problem with it but do it in UK not here in India.
 
Let us not beat around the bush.

Throw out the rohingya because they are muslims.

Only a Fool will believe that those who were unable to live in peace with Buddhists in Burma will somehow live in peace with Hindus in India.

Do what we have to, but throw them OUT.
or, finish the job that our Buddhist brothers began in their country.

shame that'll never happen, just ship them off to somewhere in ummahland, maybe Germany or Sweden because those are suicidal societies.
 
Nightmare of mullah led show? Such creatures shout loud while issuing threats and cry even louder once taken to task. We have enough of them and we don't need more. Case closed. You can join them in their collective breast beating over "humanity" no problem with it but do it in UK not here in India.
I got nothing to do with them... :)
rohingya issue should not be judged on what mullah says or not... it immaterial...
i was pointing that sanghis have nightmare about 40k muslims taking over India... they have already imagined that these rohingyas will grow up to be terrorists. India has 160 million muslims and god knows how many bd illegals... the later never engaged in any terror incident... still sanghis have nightmare about terrorism and muslims.
as to mullahs threatening, barking dog sheldom bites...
 
I got nothing to do with them... :)
rohingya issue should not be judged on what mullah says or not... it immaterial...
i was pointing that sanghis have nightmare about 40k muslims taking over India... they have already imagined that these rohingyas will grow up to be terrorists. India has 160 million muslims and god knows how many bd illegals... the later never engaged in any terror incident... still sanghis have nightmare about terrorism and muslims.
as to mullahs threatening, barking dog sheldom bites...

If you have space in your home back in India kindly hide them there because no matter how much you cry about humanity GoI will tag them and deport them back.
 
If you have space in your home back in India kindly hide them there because no matter how much you cry about humanity GoI will tag them and deport them back.
we are arguing about what 'should' happen.. not what 'will' happen. i have no prediction about the outcome of the court case... my haunch is bjp govt will bow down to pressure from international community. wanna bet?
1 year sanyas from pdf whoever is wrong.... time period is next 6 month(something should happen in next 6 month).
 
we are arguing about what 'should' happen.. not what 'will' happen. i have no prediction about the outcome of the court case... my haunch is bjp govt will bow down to pressure from international community. wanna bet?
1 year sanyas from pdf whoever is wrong.... time period is next 6 month(something should happen in next 6 month).
Sure, you are on.
 
A video from Chanakya Serial about refugees

If that was the thought process, what changed when the Zoroastrian refugees landed in Gujarat?

Why were they allowed?

After all, no one then had the benefit of hindsight to know what the Parsis would do for India.

The Parsis could well have turned rogue.

Persia could have turned around.

Then you'd have had a resurgent Persia on your doorstep, with Persians in your midst.

It would be interesting to get some insight into Jadi Rana's council deliberations.

No mention of that in the Qissa-e-Sanjan ....

Cheers, Doc
 
If that was the thought process, what changed when the Zoroastrian refugees landed in Gujarat?

Why were they allowed?

After all, no one then had the benefit of hindsight to know what the Parsis would do for India.

The Parsis could well have turned rogue.

Persia could have turned around.

Then you'd have had a resurgent Persia on your doorstep, with Persians in your midst.

It would be interesting to get some insight into Jadi Rana's council deliberations.

No mention of that in the Qissa-e-Sanjan ....

Cheers, Doc
It was a debate where people gave their opinion, I don't believe they decided to refuse to take refugees.
 
If that was the thought process, what changed when the Zoroastrian refugees landed in Gujarat?

Why were they allowed?

After all, no one then had the benefit of hindsight to know what the Parsis would do for India.

The Parsis could well have turned rogue.

Persia could have turned around.

Then you'd have had a resurgent Persia on your doorstep, with Persians in your midst.

It would be interesting to get some insight into Jadi Rana's council deliberations.

No mention of that in the Qissa-e-Sanjan ....

Cheers, Doc

Zoroastrianism is not a proselytizing religion. Because they keep to themselves and do not accept converts, they are no threat to India. Islam is the exact opposite in this regard.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom