What's new

Rangs-Mahindra vehicle assembly plant starts its journey

BTW @madokafc , the simplest of searches reveals how dissonant certain members are with the reality.

Take for example:

"I have repeatedly said that Indian products never sold at all in Bangladesh"

Let's look at this paper from one of their leading (relatively speaking of course) institutions:

http://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10361/8332/10204021_BBA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Pages 18 - 20 especially should be quite telling how much emotion (rather than facts) this bufoon here is now desperately clinging to. Clearly shows how Mahindra is late entrant and is now growing its market share (in a small market to begin with).

I especially love this part:

(BD truck market roughly 3800 units a year)  It is dominated by Indian brands like Tata and Ashok Leyland  Of the total market share, Tata holds around 50 percent, followed by Ashok Leyland at 21 percent and Eicher 16 percent.

But noooo, they are on the verge of a boycott of Indian products (yet again! :rofl:) and India is somehow keeping away countries that would otherwise be lining up to give the full vertical integration/local sourcing to B'Desh :lol: (nothing to do with BD scrawny malnourished economy which lacks any auto part fabrication and know how at all).

Honestly the butthurt these people have regarding the reality materialising is hillarious. They think they can bargain for gold when they can only afford a cpl peanuts....and when the peanuts come instead of the gold, its all a big Indian chanakya conspiracy :cheesy:
 
Indians here are hyper-ventilating over the Baleno - a dull-design mini car that boasts a 1.2 liter engine, manual transmission and plastic seats (wait- you get a radio! :lol:). Such kanjoosi pieces-of-crap don't warrant even a third-rate consideration in the Bangladesh car market. Same for Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

But for what the car offers in (lack of) comfort and convenience - they still charge you like Sin. That micro car on the road will cost you north of 8 Lac rupees. Bouncing around over potholes on tiny auto-rickshaw wheels.

The minimum-size family car sold locally in Bangladesh is a Toyota Premio/Allion, with a 1.5 to 1.8 liter engine typically.

1024px-TOYOTA_PREMIO_T260_201606_03.jpeg


1280px-Toyota_Premio_2016%2CBangladesh.jpg
 
Such kanjoosi pieces-of-crap don't warrant even a third-rate consideration in the Bangladesh car market.

Ah yes because Bangladesh car market is so much more developed than the countries and regions Baleno is being exported to....like Japan, Western Europe :D What is the world knowledge (and subsequent perception if such knowledge exists) of super-developed Bangladesh compared to 4th world Japan and Western Europe?

Keep digging that hole loser....and posting what the 0.1% of the 20k clunker-based BD consumption is and thinking everyone believes extrapolating that lol (of course you won't post any actual studies on market composition -as malnourished as it is, because they all end up like the BRAC one....highly dissonant from your fantasy world if they even exist in the first place - who wants to honestly time and effort to researching something so small and insignificant and worse STAGNANT at these pitiful levels).

Just look at the videos of Dhaka streets....fact checked royally good and hard with next to no effort....there are literally "cars" falling apart (leaving bits and pieces all over because they are clunkers of clunkers of someone else's clunkers who made a quick buck over selling it for scrap) at intersections that look like they belong in the most ravaged parts of Syria, Libya and the Congo (just like the economist rated Dhaka liveability wise)

Good that you have 0 response to the BRAC study on mahindra and BD truck market composition...after all the hoohaahing earlier in the the thread. You give so much rope and then you hang yourself with it right on cue....you get off from the asphyxiation or something? :hang2:

@Aung Zaya @madokafc :D Enjoy the fun.
 
GDP measured how? Influenced only by what you trade or what everyone actually physically consumes?

Because if its the latter (way more important as seen by its use in HDI and other development/wealth metrics), you are doing far worse than Myanmar esp given you were ahead of them in early 2000's and now far behind:

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=44&pr.y=12&sy=2000&ey=2022&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=513,518&s=PPPPC&grp=0&a=

This is one of many particular topics 0 of your BD's know anything about and keep yabbering.

Dude, what matters is the value of the economy in international dollars.

End of the day, weapons will be imported in dollars and that will decide who is the more stronger militarily.

That is the context of BD having an economy 3.5x as large that it was mentioned in.

PS - Russian Prime Minister is visiting BD next month. Want to guess whether 8+4 SU-30SME jets will be signed for then as per the tender earlier this year? Just these 12 Sukhois will allow BAF to dominate the MAF's Mig-29s and soon to be coming JF-17s.
 
Dude, what matters is the value of the economy in international dollars.

End of the day, weapons will be imported in dollars and that will decide who is the more stronger militarily.

Basically you are in favour of even trading off actual consumption if it leads to higher nominal deployment (even if more people starve and cant afford essentials)....because "military". A good North Korean/Maoist like attitude....hope your country pursues it will full vigour (it wont, but here's to hoping for it)...essentially India will be the biggest victor in such policy in the end. Your country can actually push its nominal size quite easily in few short steps (points if you know any of them) bypassing its corrupt bureaucracy even to "militarize" (you being quite unable to understand what the opportunity cost of 0 multiplier effect in imported military goods is at such early malnourished investment and consumption of a LDC) ....but it wont...it fundamentally understands that will be the straw that breaks the camel's back (because it is comprised of many more people debating and formulating policy with real consequences on them than you sitting in the UK dreaming up scenarios)....leading to destruction (and worse long term depression) of BD quite shortly thereafter. Every nominal argument is "most important" is simply a scaled version of this at such low nominal and PPP per capita levels when the buffer and interplay between the two are still in infancy.

Thus you simply do not understand why nominal is trashed and irrelevant as far as genuine development (and long term sustainable growth) of a country goes when its below 10k or even 5k per capita....and no point trying to explain it to you....you have a big inferiority complex from lack of military goodies and capability (and even less willingness to use them) and SHW being who she is...combined with what just happened brazenly to BD in recent weeks :)

Get back to vehicle discussion on this thread thanks. BRAC paper on the issue should be quite illuminating to BD market scenario in the sector.
 
Basically you are in favour of even trading off actual consumption if it leads to higher nominal deployment (even if more people starve and cant afford essentials)....because "military". A good North Korean/Maoist like attitude....hope your country pursues it will full vigour (it wont, but here's to hoping for it)...essentially India will be the biggest victor in such policy in the end. Your country can actually push its nominal size quite easily in few short steps (points if you know any of them) bypassing its corrupt bureaucracy even to "militarize" (you being quite unable to understand what the opportunity cost of 0 multiplier effect in imported military goods is at such early malnourished investment and consumption of a LDC) ....but it wont...it fundamentally understands that will be the straw that breaks the camel's back (because it is comprised of many more people debating and formulating policy with real consequences on them than you sitting in the UK dreaming up scenarios)....leading to destruction (and worse long term depression) of BD quite shortly thereafter. Every nominal argument is "most important" is simply a scaled version of this at such low nominal and PPP per capita levels when the buffer and interplay between the two are still in infancy.

Thus you simply do not understand why nominal is trashed and irrelevant as far as genuine development (and long term sustainable growth) of a country goes when its below 10k or even 5k per capita....and no point trying to explain it to you....you have a big inferiority complex from lack of military goodies and capability (and even less willingness to use them) and SHW being who she is...combined with what just happened brazenly to BD in recent weeks :)

Get back to vehicle discussion on this thread thanks. BRAC paper on the issue should be quite illuminating to BD market scenario in the sector.

Why you wasted so much time writing this garbage? Lol
 
Why you wasted so much time writing this garbage? Lol

You will know as soon as you see his recent pictures of all-male vacation in Goa....must have been an experience.....filled with thrilling selfie-taking fun every five minutes. ;)

Cutting down on consumption of Laddoos would be advisable.

My only other question is - where do you buy these damn Langotees?

beach-cricket-in-calangute-picture-id148869085


69554-pvdzriesjo-1506533722.jpg
 
Last edited:
Expecting the locally assembled vehicles will cut the product deliver time and reduce import cost around 10 % to 15% Sohana said the plant has the capacity to produce more than 2,000 vehicles per year.
“We are also excited about the prospect of 500 job opportunities in the plant and the customers will get quality vehicles and efficient services from us in lower prices compared to others,” she added.
I really cannot understand the math of the two news quotations above. 500 workers will be assembling only 2000 units. It means, 5 units per worker per year. Is it not too low a production? I think it should be either 50 workers assembling 2,000 units or 500 workers producing 20,000 units.
 
I really cannot understand the math of the two news quotations above. 500 workers will be assembling only 2000 units. It means, 5 units per worker per year. Is it not too low a production? I think it should be either 50 workers assembling 2,000 units or 500 workers producing 20,000 units.

The 500 job opportunities will not all be assembly line workers.

In fact only 50 - 100 may be like you say for pure worker.

At this starting level, the rest of the plant will have higher % of building maintenance/security/cleaning/testing/misc folks (i.e accessory employment to the main production).....which %-wise only becomes much smaller as large assembly lines are put in (i.e facility expanded) and assembly workers become the dominant job in the factory unit.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom