What's new

PPP says 'no' to second extension in tenure of military courts

Dubious

RETIRED MOD
Jul 22, 2012
37,717
80
72,150
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Dawn.com
Updated January 18, 2019

5c42162e7de2b.png

PPP leader and former senator Farhatullah Babar speaks at a press conference in Karachi on Friday. — DawnNewsTV

The PPP on Friday said it was firmly sticking to its stance of opposing a second extension in the tenure of military courts, which were set up in 2015 to try civilians on charges of terrorism.

"NO to the military courts," declared senior PPP leader Farhatullah Babar at a press conference in Karachi. He along with other party leaders was briefing the media after a meeting of PPP's central office-bearers and senior leaders held at the Bilawal House.

In December, PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari had unequivocally said that his party would not support another extension to the military courts, whose current two-year term is set to expire in March.

Stating the reasons behind the party's stance on the issue, Babar said incidents of terrorism in Pakistan had witnessed a decline and therefore there was "no justification for military courts".

Even if terrorism incidents had not declined, he said, "then the military courts cannot do in 40 years [what] they haven't been able to do in four years".

Secondly, Babar said when "extraordinary laws" implemented under "extraordinary circumstances" are extended, then after some time certain "vested interests" are created to protect such legislation; he cited the example of the Hudood Ordinances and others laws from Gen Ziaul Haq's era in this regard.

He said the PPP was opposing the military tribunals "lest it happens that Pakistan's judiciary is militarised and the military becomes judicialised", adding that such a situation would be very dangerous for the country.

The former senator alleged that a "dangerous" nexus existed between military courts and missing persons in the country, adding that the tribunals had allegedly been used to "justify" enforced disappearances on the pretext that cases against such (missing) persons were being heard by military courts.

"This is something which the PPP and its human rights agenda will never accept," Babar said. "If an extension was given once [to the military courts], that was one time too much."

The military courts were allowed to try civilians accused of terrorism in January 2015, soon after a terrorist attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar in December 2014. In the attack, 144 people — mostly children — were killed by the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan.

The courts were given a two-year constitutional cover after both houses of the parliament passed the 21st constitutional amendment, despite fears among lawmakers that the tribunals they were authorising would not be able to ensure due process to the suspects and might undermine democracy. The amendment included a sunset clause under which the courts' tenure would expire in two years.

The military courts remained dysfunctional from January 7, 2017 till March 2017 (due to expiry of the two-year constitutional cover), after which they were extended for another two years by the parliament.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1458331
 
When 9/11 happened FBI didnt hesitate to pick up and question anyone "suspected" even 10 yrs later they had: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

In Australia:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

In UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art09.shtml

When you are fighting within your country...These military courts are more useful to find and give swift punishment!

Wonder what PPP is hiding!
 
PPP leadership feeling the pinch of accountability has decided to retaliate against the establishment in its own way but am afraid these blackmailing tactics will not work this time
 
Military courts are the need of the hour, says the ISPR director-general
January 19, 2019

Samaa Digital

Asif-Ghafoor-640x480.jpg


Military courts are not a wish but the need of the hour.

This was stated by ISPR Director-General Major-General Asif Ghafoor on Friday.

The tenure of military courts, which were established after the 2014 attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar, is set to expire in March.

“A decrease in terrorism has been witnessed [in the country] because of military courts,” said the ISPR director-general.

During a course of four years, 717 cases were filed in military courts, he said, adding that 646 of these cases were decided.

As many as 345 convicts were awarded death sentences during this time out of whom 56 were executed, he said.

He said the decision to give an extension to military courts rests with the Parliament.

Meanwhile, PPP leader Farhatullah Babar opposed a second extension in the tenure of military courts while speaking to the media after a party meeting at the Bilawal House in Karachi.

He asked what the need for an extension was when terrorism had decreased in the country.

The PPP leader said when “extraordinary laws” implemented under “extraordinary circumstances” are extended, vested interests are created eventually to protect such legislation.

The military courts were allowed to try civilians accused of terrorism in January 2015, soon after a terrorist attack on the APS in Peshawar in December 2014. In the attack, 144 people, mostly students, were killed by the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan.

https://www.samaa.tv/news/2019/01/m...d-of-the-hour-says-the-ispr-director-general/

345 convicts were awarded death sentences during this time out of whom 56 were executed,
Only 56 were executed and the West were screaming like we executed all 345?! What happened to the rest?
 
When 9/11 happened FBI didnt hesitate to pick up and question anyone "suspected" even 10 yrs later they had: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

In Australia:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

In UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art09.shtml

When you are fighting within your country...These military courts are more useful to find and give swift punishment!

Wonder what PPP is hiding!

They know they will be finally exposed. Apart from the corruption, PPP like MQM has some backing from foreign agency. If one of their members is picked during army operation, they will spill the beans on the higher ups. They fear this more, since they can't buy off the military courts.

Money laundering is not just one way street. Without a doubt, elements foreign agency knew about the money laundering, and they allowed it in return for "scratch my back, and i will scratch yours"
 
This is second point of opposition great Alliance in order to divert attentions from Fake account case/mega money laundering case and trying to get some relief or NRO.

Points which I mentioned here.
Shehbaz presides moot of opposition parties in Islamabad

We have already observed that right now PMLN playing cards for PPP and PPP playing cards for PMLN. For example it was PPP who started conspiracy against awarding the contract of muhmand dam despite the fact that contract was awarded on merit. and now Shahbaz Sharif is also opposing the contract of muhmand Dam.

SC handover the case of fake Accounts and mega money laundering to NAB and wants detailed inquiry/investigation on behalf of JIT report within two months, so it is a third point of opposition Alliance to effect NAB investigations for example "Members of opposition refuse to meet Chairman NAB in his office, requested him to come to Parliament for meeting", Now this move of opposition will surely effect the NAB investigation of fake accounts and there will be weak references by the NAB on behalf of JIT report. And SC verdicts can be in favour of PPP due to weak references and this objective can only be achieved to divert attentions either by accusing military courts or make Dams controversial (Which is basically a agenda of enemy).

This is dirty politics by Opposition to target, pressurise the institutions including Govt in order to get safe passage.

So you need to understand the pseudo intellectual's (PPP-PMLN) strategies.
 
Last edited:
When 9/11 happened FBI didnt hesitate to pick up and question anyone "suspected" even 10 yrs later they had: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

In Australia:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

In UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art09.shtml

When you are fighting within your country...These military courts are more useful to find and give swift punishment!

Wonder what PPP is hiding!
One of the people's party's prominent "liberal" leader Dr Asim was charged with providing medical care to terrorists in his private hospital not so long ago
 
"NO to the military courts,"

That is the correct stance. The better way is to bolster the regular courts and not continue to destroy the civilian institutions by steady erosion of their constitutionally mandated authorities.
 
Last edited:
During PPP era , Interior minister said that all judges and related staff feel under threat due to terrorism related cases in there court. Because in some cases these terrorist kidnap judges children...Many time arrested terrorist admit there crime and challenge the judges guts for punishment. Where majority of cases judges let go there terrorist. A living example, when ex CJ Iftikhar Chaudry let go 1700 terrorist arrested by PA and rangers.
I think Zaradari is opposing , because few of his cases are registered or will be registered in military courts. Where justice is fast and absolute ...

That is the correct stance. The better way is to bolster the regular courts and not continue to destroy the civilian institutions by steady erosion of their constitutionally mandated authorities.
We have 3000 judges and local magistrates, do you think they have capacity to deal 19 lack cases. Plus, if they deal terrorism related cases then they need extra security. Judges on all levels refused to take such type of cases where there own life and family under threat. First govt need to release fund to hire more judges and para legal staff. Then provide constitutional security .

Dawn.com
Updated January 18, 2019

5c42162e7de2b.png

PPP leader and former senator Farhatullah Babar speaks at a press conference in Karachi on Friday. — DawnNewsTV

The PPP on Friday said it was firmly sticking to its stance of opposing a second extension in the tenure of military courts, which were set up in 2015 to try civilians on charges of terrorism.

"NO to the military courts," declared senior PPP leader Farhatullah Babar at a press conference in Karachi. He along with other party leaders was briefing the media after a meeting of PPP's central office-bearers and senior leaders held at the Bilawal House.

In December, PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari had unequivocally said that his party would not support another extension to the military courts, whose current two-year term is set to expire in March.

Stating the reasons behind the party's stance on the issue, Babar said incidents of terrorism in Pakistan had witnessed a decline and therefore there was "no justification for military courts".

Even if terrorism incidents had not declined, he said, "then the military courts cannot do in 40 years [what] they haven't been able to do in four years".

Secondly, Babar said when "extraordinary laws" implemented under "extraordinary circumstances" are extended, then after some time certain "vested interests" are created to protect such legislation; he cited the example of the Hudood Ordinances and others laws from Gen Ziaul Haq's era in this regard.

He said the PPP was opposing the military tribunals "lest it happens that Pakistan's judiciary is militarised and the military becomes judicialised", adding that such a situation would be very dangerous for the country.

The former senator alleged that a "dangerous" nexus existed between military courts and missing persons in the country, adding that the tribunals had allegedly been used to "justify" enforced disappearances on the pretext that cases against such (missing) persons were being heard by military courts.

"This is something which the PPP and its human rights agenda will never accept," Babar said. "If an extension was given once [to the military courts], that was one time too much."

The military courts were allowed to try civilians accused of terrorism in January 2015, soon after a terrorist attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar in December 2014. In the attack, 144 people — mostly children — were killed by the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan.

The courts were given a two-year constitutional cover after both houses of the parliament passed the 21st constitutional amendment, despite fears among lawmakers that the tribunals they were authorising would not be able to ensure due process to the suspects and might undermine democracy. The amendment included a sunset clause under which the courts' tenure would expire in two years.

The military courts remained dysfunctional from January 7, 2017 till March 2017 (due to expiry of the two-year constitutional cover), after which they were extended for another two years by the parliament.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1458331
I thought Benazir killed in terrorist attack .... obviously Zardari sell Bhutto to open Omani group for personal benefits ... forming a kingdom to rule Sindhi slaves.
 
We have 3000 judges and local magistrates, do you think they have capacity to deal 19 lack cases. Plus, if they deal terrorism related cases then they need extra security. They refused to take such type of cases where there own life and family under threat. First govt need to release fund to hire more judges and para legal staff. Then provide constitutional security .

The entire judicial system needs a total makeover, top to bottom, no doubt. However, efforts should be made in that direction rather than bypassing them, as you mention.
 
The entire judicial system needs a total makeover, top to bottom, no doubt. However, efforts should be made in that direction rather than bypassing them, as you mention.
Well, you forget we have extremely corrupt bureaucracy . Which is afraid of " change" . Even they know change is contagious ...They live like royals
 
Well, you forget we have extremely corrupt bureaucracy . Which is afraid of " change" . Even they know change is contagious ...They live like royals

Well, you forget that corruption in Pakistan is widespread top to bottom, across the entire board. Hence, we can see what happens in a country like that.
 
Well, you forget that corruption in Pakistan is widespread top to bottom, across the entire board. Hence, we can see what happens in a country like that.
But, politicians comes of 5 years and these bureaucracy remain there and show them the path of heaven ...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom