Provide proof or you are a liar.
Would that apply to the accusers against
@Champion_Usmani without concrete evidence to back with as well?
Are Imranistan liar by that stance?
I witnessed you hurling family abuse in the past. Those abusive posts are filtered as the result to keep the forum family friendly. Even if i prove, it won't change anything since the whole debate has been about
@Champion_Usmani being accused of spreading misinformation without evidence to back with clears the confusion thanks to you confirming that those Imranistan along with Moderators are indeed 100% liar since they cannot prove anything just like i cannot prove you hurled family abuse in this forum in the past that resulted of temporary banned to be unbanned in no time.
Admittedly, i don't mind being called liar
[in regards to allegation against you even though i witnessed you hurling family abuse firsthand] if that is what it takes to prove that
@Champion_Usmani is innocent who has been wrongly accused and banned based on the lies. Ironically, i have been accused of being liar, jewish, anti-Arab, Anti-pathan, anti-Islam, and many more in the past by the Imranistan and they-alike but so might as well earn
it [the allegation of being liar in this case].
The whole debate started with you saying that this article proved that he was right, when infact the article doesn't have anything in it except that first line, so obviously didn't even read it, nor did you read what i wrote
Clearly, reading comprehension is your issue. That article doesn't contradict to the premise that
@Champion_Usmani has created for discussion. That article doesn't need to shout 'AGREE' since it is in line with the premise of
@Champion_Usmani. Otherwise, there would be contradiction that would beg to differ.
Can you underline the contradiction that discredits the premise of
@Champion_Usmani? After all, it is you guys who accused him, not the other way around.